The use of the term "most" noted. :-)

The point here is that "most" simply accepts that "some" may do so, and
they will be the instances someone will them find gives them a problem.
Thus - perhaps - asking for advice. Even "a few" when many thousands were
made can mean some will.

But - as per my first posting - the stats indicate that an antenna or
downlead degraded by water, birds, etc is more likely. Followed by some
other change in reception conditions - change in multipath, or a new TX in
the same tuned RF band, etc.

Jim


In article , Brian Gaff
wrote:
I'd not say the drift is the cause. Most receivers of the vintage noted
are pretty good. As its changed over time far more likely to be aerial
related. Brian

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_pa...o/electron.htm
biog http://jcgl.orpheusweb.co.uk/history/ups_and_downs.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html