Michael, The US population in 1850 was around 22 million, it is now 280
million. This is a greater percentage then what you were proposing for
China. Look at the following graph http://www.npg.org/historypop.html

APR.

"Michael Conzo" wrote in message
...
"Patric" wrote:

I'm sure a reasonable person such as yourself can see that almost 2
million people could quite easily reach 22 million in approximately
160 years since the Famine emigration began.

A demographer you're not.

The population of China in 1850 was about 450,000,000. By your analysis,
China (also until recently with extremely large families) should have a
population of almost 5 billion now.

Your statistics are dodgy by a factor of at least four.

APR wrote:

Michael, The US population in 1850 was around 22 million, it is now 280
million. This is a greater percentage then what you were proposing for
China. Look at the following graph http://www.npg.org/historypop.html


Actually, our governmetn undercounts at least 15 million-20 million
illegal immigrants. The actual population in the U.S. currently
ia roughly 320 million, with about 25 million of that not on the
official government tally.

On Sat, 07 May 2005 22:05:45 GMT, Joseph Oberlander
wrote:useless garbage and then
spammed it

HEY DICKHEAD DO US ALL A FAVOUR AND POST TO A RELEVANT GROUP. AND
STOP CROSSPOSTING TO NEWSGROUPS THAT DON'T GIVE A RATS ARSE ABOUT
THIS TOPIC.

On Sat, 7 May 2005 17:50:04 +1000, "APR"
wrote:

Michael, The US population in 1850 was around 22 million, it is now 280
million. This is a greater percentage then what you were proposing for
China. Look at the following graph http://www.npg.org/historypop.html

APR.


THE POPULATION MIGHT BE LESS IN YOUR COUNTRY IF I KNEW WHERE ALL THESE
CROSSPOSTING IDIOTS LIVED!!

HEY DICKHEAD DO US ALL A FAVOUR AND POST TO A RELEVANT GROUP. AND
STOP CROSSPOSTING TO NEWSGROUPS THAT DON'T GIVE A RATS ARSE ABOUT
THIS TOPIC.