Audio Banter

Audio Banter (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/)
-   -   Re Valve amps (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/2103-valve-amps.html)

StaffBull August 3rd 04 08:31 PM

Re Valve amps
 
Thanks for the helpful comments below - another question I have is if I
would leave a valve amp on all the time or switch it off and have to wait
for it to warm up every time I need it?
cheers



Dave Plowman (News) August 3rd 04 09:49 PM

Re Valve amps
 
In article ,
StaffBull wrote:
Thanks for the helpful comments below - another question I have is if I
would leave a valve amp on all the time or switch it off and have to wait
for it to warm up every time I need it?


Valves - unlike transistors - have a finite life. And according to some,
modern valves have a shorter life than once was the case.

I'd personally not trust many valve amps to be left on unattended - I've
seen too many go up in smoke. And certainly not a 'budget' valve amp.

--
*Hard work has a future payoff. Laziness pays off NOW.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Andy Evans August 3rd 04 10:33 PM

Re Valve amps
 
I'd personally not trust many valve amps to be left on unattended - I've seen
too many go up in smoke. And certainly not a 'budget' valve amp.

Can't say it's ever happened to me, but the potential is there I suppose. Mind,
these days there should be fuses in strategic places. I tend to turn my amp on
in the morning and turn it off at night. With valve rectifiers there's a nice
slow warm up, so not much harm is done turning the amp off and on if you prefer
to do it more frequently. Valves for the most part are not too expensive -
cheaper probably than the batteries a household uses up in the same time span.
So far they have kept their value so spares can even be something of an
investment if you choose wisely and buy at cheap prices.

=== Andy Evans ===
Visit our Website:- http://www.artsandmedia.com
Audio, music and health pages and interesting links.

Trevor Wilson August 4th 04 01:39 AM

Re Valve amps
 

"StaffBull" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the helpful comments below - another question I have is if I
would leave a valve amp on all the time or switch it off and have to wait
for it to warm up every time I need it?


**ALL power amps should be switched off, until they are required for use.
There are several reasons for this:
* Leaving an amp switched on, accelerates wear and tear on several parts. In
SS amps, this means electrolytic caps. In valve amps, this means valves and
electrolytic caps.
* Leaving the amp switched on, leaves the amp open to line surges and
spikes, which may damage equipment.
* Leaving the amp switched on is not environmentally sensitive.

Tell me again why you would buy an amp, without first listening to it?
Tell my why you think this is a good idea?


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au



Stewart Pinkerton August 4th 04 05:40 AM

Re Valve amps
 
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 01:39:29 GMT, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:


"StaffBull" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the helpful comments below - another question I have is if I
would leave a valve amp on all the time or switch it off and have to wait
for it to warm up every time I need it?


**ALL power amps should be switched off, until they are required for use.


Hooey.

There are several reasons for this:
* Leaving an amp switched on, accelerates wear and tear on several parts. In
SS amps, this means electrolytic caps. In valve amps, this means valves and
electrolytic caps.


Hooey. If it's not a class A amp, or otherwise warm inside, it puts
less strain on the caps to leave them switched on. Start-up surges are
a major cause of cap failure.

My Audiolab 8000P has been switched on for about eight years, and
works just fine. I don't leave the Krell switched on, because it's a
true class A design, and pulls 300 watts from the wall at idle!

* Leaving the amp switched on, leaves the amp open to line surges and
spikes, which may damage equipment.


Only badly designed equipment, and not everywhere has such crappy
mains that this is an issue.

* Leaving the amp switched on is not environmentally sensitive.


Neither is farting, but I doubt it's a major issue.

Tell me again why you would buy an amp, without first listening to it?
Tell my why you think this is a good idea?


Seems like a bad idea - much like attempting to drive any decent
speaker with a cheap valve amp, when the same money would buy you a
sonically transparent SS amp.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Jim Lesurf August 4th 04 08:34 AM

Re Valve amps
 
In article , Trevor Wilson
wrote:

"StaffBull" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the helpful comments below - another question I have is if
I would leave a valve amp on all the time or switch it off and have to
wait for it to warm up every time I need it?


**ALL power amps should be switched off, until they are required for
use. There are several reasons for this: * Leaving an amp switched on,
accelerates wear and tear on several parts. In SS amps, this means
electrolytic caps.


I would quibble a bit with this. :-)

IIUC Electrolytic caps also deteriorate if *not* used for prolonged
periods. Provided they are used well within their ratings, being charged up
means they should have a 'self healing' tendency for minor electronic
leakages. Hence, left unused they may show a fall in capacity and rise in
leakage current. This should recover with use, though.

Above said, the 'goop' that is inside them does deteriorate with age, use,
and temperature. Hence using them does wear them out. Should be quite a
slow process if they are well built and cautiously rated, though.

FWIW I just turn on the amps before use, and turn them off afterwards. Mind
you, I am happy with SS amps, and don't normally notice any signs of
'warming up' over a long period. With a valve amp, I'd probably be inclined
to switch them on 10 mins before use, and off after use. Dislike leaving
things like this powered up unattended due to the risk of failures. Small
risk probability, but the 'cost' of a house fire can be quite large! Prefer
peace of mind.

Slainte,

Jim

--
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html
Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html
Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html

Keith G August 4th 04 01:12 PM

Re Valve amps
 

"Trevor Wilson" wrote

**ALL power amps should be switched off, until they are required for use.
There are several reasons



snipped but agreed with entirely


Tell me again why you would buy an amp, without first listening to it?
Tell my why you think this is a good idea?



OK, Trevor, you're not getting a nibble so I'll respond:

Firstly, as the OP is in N Wales I think you should be a little less
sheepish, ram your point home a bit harder and qualify your question thus:
'Tell my why ewe think this is a good idea, if ewe don't hear the amp first
ewe could get the wool pulled over your eyes and someone will fleece ewe...'

(Shear common sense for an Ozzie, I would'a thought...??)

:-)

Secondly, it is not easy to get an audition of valve gear in the UK without
going to an 'audio boutique' which are few and far between and where the
prices are sky-high in any case. Hence a lot of people, looking to get into
valves are 'taking a flyer' and buying from eBay, the Net, mail order and
secondhand. This is the reason a lot of valvies (me included) have been
willing to invite people in and hear our own valve gear where they can get a
good listen without any obligation to spend money.

This has been very successful for me and I have had a number of visits that
have all been very pleasant and have actually ended up with one or two
people buying valve gear. At any rate, no-one has told me yet that they
didn't like valves!! (I have only had one instance where someone appears to
have been a bit two-faced/indiscrete and that wasn't even a 'valve
auditioner'!)

However, having said all that, I for one am a becoming a bit reluctant to
recommend valves to all and sundry as:

1) The prices will go up as valves become more popular (as they have with
secondhand vinyl, which is now about 10 times more expensive in charity
shops in the UK than it was a couple of years ago....), NOS valves will
disappear more quickly and the increasing popularity will encourage more
crap onto the market. (Offsetting this, of course, is that the same
popularity will ensure better continuity of supply generally....)

2) Valves take a lot more 'work' than ss gear - normally beyond the scope of
'box openers' if anything goes wrong. OK if a support structure establishes
itself - I already know one UK valve amp builder who is doing nicely out of
fettling cheap, new foreign amps or, as in the case of our own Fleetie, you
are able to get the spanners out if anything goes tits-up which, of course,
it can/probably will at some point.....

3) There is also the possibility that the greater danger of valves (heat,
voltages and even the greater weight of valve amps) will result in some
divot getting badly hurt and a great raft of legislation swinging into place
to control everything that will sweep away the good guys with the bad guys
like it's doing with everything else these days!

The current influx of cheap Chinky amps is both a good and bad thing (for
various reasons mentioned above) but I gotta say finally that I have yet to
hear a valve amp that didn't comprehensively **** all over most ss amps I've
heard in terms of 'listenability' - ie where the 'music' counts more than
the 'sound quality'......

(My 2p only....)





Keith G August 4th 04 01:49 PM

Re Valve amps
 

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 01:39:29 GMT, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:


"StaffBull" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the helpful comments below - another question I have is if

I
would leave a valve amp on all the time or switch it off and have to

wait
for it to warm up every time I need it?


**ALL power amps should be switched off, until they are required for use.


Hooey.



Not hooey - all electrical items (without a built in timer needing stanby
current) should be switched off if not in use, including amplifiers. (Ask
your insurers.....)



My Audiolab 8000P has been switched on for about eight years, and
works just fine. I don't leave the Krell switched on, because it's a
true class A design, and pulls 300 watts from the wall at idle!



Presumably the Krell doesn't suffer from being switched off then? Or does it
take that bit longer to strike an arc.....???

;-)






Mike Gilmour August 4th 04 01:51 PM

Re Valve amps
 

"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 01:39:29 GMT, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:


"StaffBull" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the helpful comments below - another question I have is

if
I
would leave a valve amp on all the time or switch it off and have to

wait
for it to warm up every time I need it?

**ALL power amps should be switched off, until they are required for

use.

Hooey.



Not hooey - all electrical items (without a built in timer needing stanby
current) should be switched off if not in use, including amplifiers. (Ask
your insurers.....)



My Audiolab 8000P has been switched on for about eight years, and
works just fine. I don't leave the Krell switched on, because it's a
true class A design, and pulls 300 watts from the wall at idle!



Presumably the Krell doesn't suffer from being switched off then? Or does

it
take that bit longer to strike an arc.....???

;-)


...with carbon rods.... for home cinema. ;-)



Andy Evans August 4th 04 02:01 PM

Re Valve amps
 
Hello Keith - I'm not sure about some of what you write he
1) The prices will go up as valves become more popular
Prices for new production Russian, Czech and Chinese valves are pretty static,
and there is a mountain of common valves out there (viz. guitar amp and hifi
models like ECC***, 6L6GT, EL34 etc). Several mountains of less common valves,
to the point that dealers just junk a lot of types to save rental on keeping
them.
(as they have with secondhand vinyl, which is now about 10 times more
expensive in charity shops in the UK than it was a couple of years ago....)
?????? all my information is that common vinyl, e.g. classical orchestral, is
rock bottom. Jazz and pop is different, since this is now 'collectors' rather
than consumer. Just try and sell a collection of 1,000 classical LPs (I have
such a collection to sell - please give me 10 times what they were worth a
couple of years ago!)
NOS valves will disappear more quickly
Remember that vast quantities are being hoarded by valve users. And anyway, new
production (EH, JJ, EI, Svetlana etc) is getting better and better and new
types are being manufactured every year. This year sees, for instance, the 7591
and 7868 from Eh and JJ, plus new and greatly improved Chinese 845s.
and the increasing popularity will encourage more crap onto the market
Well, so far, more good stuff has come onto the market including some very fine
new valves as above.
(Offsetting this, of course, is that the same popularity will ensure better
continuity of supply generally....) Agreed

2) Valves take a lot more 'work' than ss gear Agreed
OK if a support structure establishes
itself There is a good support structure - less than before but maybe
something like Leica owners or classic car builders.

3) There is also the possibility that the greater danger of valves will result
in a great raft of legislation swinging into place
Why wouldn't this have happened already in the century or so of valve use? Why
would a government even bother with such a small issue these days?

I think we bottleheads are ultimately going to become rarities, but the sound
of valves lives on - musicians love them and use them, and a number of musical
listeners, as you say, find they come closest to the sound they find represents
the "musical experience". I think digital amps are coming up fast and I'd see
the future there rather than in analogue SS. Some digital amps sound rather
fine. But valves will live on simply because of the investment people have made
in them. I'd bet that when valve equipment becomes rare there will still be a
mountain of unused valves out there. Andy


=== Andy Evans ===
Visit our Website:- http://www.artsandmedia.com
Audio, music and health pages and interesting links.

Mike Gilmour August 4th 04 02:15 PM

Re Valve amps
 

"Keith G" wrote in message
...
Clipped wooly bit ;-)

Secondly, it is not easy to get an audition of valve gear in the UK

without
going to an 'audio boutique' which are few and far between and where the
prices are sky-high in any case. Hence a lot of people, looking to get

into
valves are 'taking a flyer' and buying from eBay, the Net, mail order and
secondhand. This is the reason a lot of valvies (me included) have been
willing to invite people in and hear our own valve gear where they can get

a
good listen without any obligation to spend money.


Buying without audition is happening more and more in this neck of the woods
(Highlands) as its so easy to move it on via ebay if its not what you wanted
and maybe also make a bit of profit on it too if you're lucky.


This has been very successful for me and I have had a number of visits

that
have all been very pleasant and have actually ended up with one or two
people buying valve gear. At any rate, no-one has told me yet that they
didn't like valves!! (I have only had one instance where someone appears

to
have been a bit two-faced/indiscrete and that wasn't even a 'valve
auditioner'!)


Same here, I've had a few folk who've also taken up valves after listening
here.


However, having said all that, I for one am a becoming a bit reluctant to
recommend valves to all and sundry as:

1) The prices will go up as valves become more popular (as they have with
secondhand vinyl, which is now about 10 times more expensive in charity
shops in the UK than it was a couple of years ago....), NOS valves will
disappear more quickly and the increasing popularity will encourage more
crap onto the market. (Offsetting this, of course, is that the same
popularity will ensure better continuity of supply generally....)


It could go the other way i.e. the manufacture of even better more reliable
valves - surely with modern technology the NOS valves could be copied and
improved upon?


2) Valves take a lot more 'work' than ss gear - normally beyond the scope

of
'box openers' if anything goes wrong. OK if a support structure

establishes
itself - I already know one UK valve amp builder who is doing nicely out

of
fettling cheap, new foreign amps or, as in the case of our own Fleetie,

you
are able to get the spanners out if anything goes tits-up which, of

course,
it can/probably will at some point.....

3) There is also the possibility that the greater danger of valves (heat,
voltages and even the greater weight of valve amps) will result in some
divot getting badly hurt and a great raft of legislation swinging into

place
to control everything that will sweep away the good guys with the bad guys
like it's doing with everything else these days!


Many tube amps are weighty but don't forget SS amplifiers are also very
heavy, the big Krells, ML's etc. My own SS amp weighs in at 125 lbs.

The current influx of cheap Chinky amps is both a good and bad thing (for
various reasons mentioned above) but I gotta say finally that I have yet

to
hear a valve amp that didn't comprehensively **** all over most ss amps

I've
heard in terms of 'listenability' - ie where the 'music' counts more than
the 'sound quality'......

(My 2p only....)


Make that 4p Mike







Stewart Pinkerton August 4th 04 03:48 PM

Re Valve amps
 
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 14:49:18 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:


"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 01:39:29 GMT, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:


"StaffBull" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the helpful comments below - another question I have is if

I
would leave a valve amp on all the time or switch it off and have to

wait
for it to warm up every time I need it?

**ALL power amps should be switched off, until they are required for use.


Hooey.


Not hooey - all electrical items (without a built in timer needing stanby
current) should be switched off if not in use, including amplifiers. (Ask
your insurers.....)


Insurers are concerned with fire risk, not capacitor failure. This is
a vexed question among audiophiles, for some mysterious reason, but
out in the real world of industrial electronics, most equipment is
kept permanently powered up. Anything with a valve in it (including
CRTs) shouldn't be permanently powered up, but that's virtually no
real-world equipment nowadays, aside from some radio transmitters.

So, the original poster should switch off his valve amp, but we
sensible folk can leave our class AB SS amps permanently switched on.


My Audiolab 8000P has been switched on for about eight years, and
works just fine. I don't leave the Krell switched on, because it's a
true class A design, and pulls 300 watts from the wall at idle!


Presumably the Krell doesn't suffer from being switched off then? Or does it
take that bit longer to strike an arc.....???


It's been working happily for about fifteen years, but it pretty much
*defines* overengineering! For instance, it's only rated at 50 watts
into 8 ohms, but it delivers 195 watts continuous into 4 ohms, both
channels driven. Basically, I'm just too mean to pay the bill for a
constant 300 watt drain! Naturally, the excess heat isn't a problem in
the UK.....................
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Stewart Pinkerton August 4th 04 03:49 PM

Re Valve amps
 
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 14:51:57 +0100, "Mike Gilmour"
wrote:


"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...


My Audiolab 8000P has been switched on for about eight years, and
works just fine. I don't leave the Krell switched on, because it's a
true class A design, and pulls 300 watts from the wall at idle!


Presumably the Krell doesn't suffer from being switched off then? Or does it
take that bit longer to strike an arc.....???

;-)

...with carbon rods.... for home cinema. ;-)


I wouldn't recommend Krell AV gear to anyone - overpriced and from a
company that now has a truly **** reputation for customer care. :-(
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Keith G August 4th 04 06:31 PM

Re Valve amps
 

"Andy Evans" wrote in message
...
Hello Keith - I'm not sure about some of what you write he



OK, a quick reply - I'm on my way out. (In more ways than one! :-)


1) The prices will go up as valves become more popular
Prices for new production Russian, Czech and Chinese valves are pretty

static,
and there is a mountain of common valves out there (viz. guitar amp and

hifi
models like ECC***, 6L6GT, EL34 etc). Several mountains of less common

valves,
to the point that dealers just junk a lot of types to save rental on

keeping
them.



Facter life - as demand increases, so does prices. Jim Fish of Wilson Valves
said (all 'anecdotal' this - check me out by all means, but don't hold me to
it) that he doesn't handle KT88s any more as the prices has gone through the
roof and he does/didn't want to get involved.....


(as they have with secondhand vinyl, which is now about 10 times more
expensive in charity shops in the UK than it was a couple of years

ago....)
?????? all my information is that common vinyl, e.g. classical orchestral,

is
rock bottom. Jazz and pop is different, since this is now 'collectors'

rather
than consumer. Just try and sell a collection of 1,000 classical LPs (I

have
such a collection to sell - please give me 10 times what they were worth a
couple of years ago!)



2 days ago, vinyl prices in Sue Ryder, Camden - Max Freakin' Bygraves was
£6.50 (that's actually a 100 times more than it used to be), Frank Sinatra
was/is £7.50 and a few Heavy Metal at these prices. A few Classical at
£1.98 - most Classical here were 3 or 4 for a quid a while back!

Local prices? - No idea, I stopped looking a year ago! (I get 98% of my
vinyl from eBay - you can't beat it!)


NOS valves will disappear more quickly
Remember that vast quantities are being hoarded by valve users. And

anyway, new
production (EH, JJ, EI, Svetlana etc) is getting better and better and new
types are being manufactured every year.



Yes, but I've been told 'when these xxx (Mullards, usually) are gone, I
doubt if I'll be able to get any more....' on numerous occasions! (Don't get
me wrong - I'll take a 12AX7EH in lieu of a Mullard any day!)


This year sees, for instance, the 7591
and 7868 from Eh and JJ, plus new and greatly improved Chinese 845s.
and the increasing popularity will encourage more crap onto the market
Well, so far, more good stuff has come onto the market including some very

fine
new valves as above.



Oh aye, it's not all bad news by a long chalk!


(Offsetting this, of course, is that the same popularity will ensure

better
continuity of supply generally....) Agreed

2) Valves take a lot more 'work' than ss gear Agreed
OK if a support structure establishes
itself There is a good support structure - less than before but maybe
something like Leica owners or classic car builders.



OK, but I mean in the context that it's no good getting a 'VFM/budget' valve
amp if you are going to get seen off having it fixed. (Also the cost of
getting them shipped about is not insignificant....)


3) There is also the possibility that the greater danger of valves will

result
in a great raft of legislation swinging into place
Why wouldn't this have happened already in the century or so of valve use?

Why
would a government even bother with such a small issue these days?



Chatting with Len Gregory (The Cartridge Man) a year or two back, he was
having a bit of a rant about VAT/Maggie Thatcher and some legislation that
says (or will say?) that any appliance with a mains lead must be capable of
being lifted by that lead. He said 'not likely with a valve amp. is it?' I
said that's easy - just use kettle leads! (Placated him a bit ;-) Btw, I
asked him if he used valve amps - he said 'yes, of course, nothing else!'
like I was daft for asking..... :-)


I think we bottleheads are ultimately going to become rarities,



That's the point, done right we don't have to be. Plenty of people believe
the valve (OK, triode then... ;-) to be the ultimate 'audio amplifier'
(analogue OR digital) so why should it ever disappear? (What beats a pair of
scissors for cutting stuff, eh??)


but the sound
of valves lives on - musicians love them and use them, and a number of

musical
listeners, as you say, find they come closest to the sound they find

represents
the "musical experience".



Yep.


I think digital amps are coming up fast and I'd see
the future there rather than in analogue SS. Some digital amps sound

rather
fine. But valves will live on simply because of the investment people have

made
in them. I'd bet that when valve equipment becomes rare there will still

be a
mountain of unused valves out there. Andy



Not as big as the pile of obsolete PCBs.......

;-)






Keith G August 4th 04 06:47 PM

Re Valve amps
 

"Mike Gilmour" wrote


OK, a lightning response here also:


Buying without audition is happening more and more in this neck of the

woods
(Highlands) as its so easy to move it on via ebay if its not what you

wanted
and maybe also make a bit of profit on it too if you're lucky.



*Exactamento*



Same here, I've had a few folk who've also taken up valves after listening
here.



I've a very nice chap (Iraqi/Turkish descent living in Brussels) ask me a
string questions about valves atm - Jeez, if you think *we're* hard done by
for valve gear and retail outlets!!!



It could go the other way i.e. the manufacture of even better more

reliable
valves - surely with modern technology the NOS valves could be copied and
improved upon?



Absolutely, but of little interest to the *real* Classic Valve Boys!! ;-)


Many tube amps are weighty but don't forget SS amplifiers are also very
heavy, the big Krells, ML's etc. My own SS amp weighs in at 125 lbs.



I'd bet that most people being tempted by 'budget' valve amps aren't coming
from ss behemoths (some of which are real amps and can sound damn near as
good as valves anyway) but from the ****e little 'flyaway' slices of brushed
aluminium....



The current influx of cheap Chinky amps is both a good and bad thing

(for
various reasons mentioned above) but I gotta say finally that I have yet

to
hear a valve amp that didn't comprehensively **** all over most ss amps

I've
heard in terms of 'listenability' - ie where the 'music' counts more

than
the 'sound quality'......

(My 2p only....)


Make that 4p Mike



(It'll take all night to make the price of a pint at this rate!! :-)






Andy Evans August 4th 04 07:34 PM

Re Valve amps
 
as demand increases, so does prices
I don't know if demand is increasing - and remember that a big slice of the
market is group gear - and in any case there are just a few 'rarities' like Syl
6SN7s, Amperex ECC83s and Mullard EL34s that are expensive, and those have
perfectly good cheap substitutes. People like Jim who spent their lives in
valve gear don't like selling at silly prices - goes against their principles.

I'd bet that when valve equipment becomes rare there will still be a
mountain of unused valves out there
Not as big as the pile of obsolete PCBs.......
LOL!
Mind, Max Bygraves at £6.50. I need to talk this through with my therapist.


=== Andy Evans ===
Visit our Website:- http://www.artsandmedia.com
Audio, music and health pages and interesting links.

Wally August 4th 04 07:42 PM

Re Valve amps
 
Andy Evans wrote:

Mind, Max Bygraves at £6.50. I need to talk this through with my
therapist.


Why, are you worried that you might buy it?


--
Wally
www.artbywally.com
www.wally.myby.co.uk



Dave Plowman (News) August 4th 04 07:57 PM

Re Valve amps
 
In article ,
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
Anything with a valve in it (including CRTs) shouldn't be permanently
powered up,


It's not so very long ago that all broadcasting equipment was valve, and
plenty was left powered up 24/7. Indeed, a power failure could result in
lots of replacements after it was resumed.
But that equipment was designed for this task - I'm not convinced el
cheapo valve amps are.

--
*The most common name in the world is Mohammed *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Tat Chan August 4th 04 11:24 PM

Re Valve amps
 
Keith G wrote:
Firstly, as the OP is in N Wales I think you should be a little less
sheepish, ram your point home a bit harder and qualify your question thus:
'Tell my why ewe think this is a good idea, if ewe don't hear the amp first
ewe could get the wool pulled over your eyes and someone will fleece ewe...'

(Shear common sense for an Ozzie, I would'a thought...??)


uhm, no ... I think the Kiwis would know more about sheep ...

:P



The current influx of cheap Chinky amps is both a good and bad thing (for

^^^^^^

OI!!! I would be careful with using that kind of language ...


Keith G August 4th 04 11:31 PM

Re Valve amps
 

"Andy Evans" wrote in message
...
as demand increases, so does prices
I don't know if demand is increasing



Apparently it is and Svetlana want their 'name' back to meet the increased
demand??? (Just gossip - I can't claim that as *fact*....)


- and remember that a big slice of the
market is group gear - and in any case there are just a few 'rarities'

like Syl
6SN7s, Amperex ECC83s and Mullard EL34s that are expensive, and those have
perfectly good cheap substitutes. People like Jim who spent their lives in
valve gear don't like selling at silly prices - goes against their

principles.


Quite. Also his prices for Mullard ECC83 remains constant irrespective of
his stock levels. Also, also he won't send them 'over the water' for much
more money although it would be easy to do and if he gets wind of people
profiteering on valves he has let them have at fair prices (on eBay or
whatever) he 'blacks' them for life....!!


Mind, Max Bygraves at £6.50. I need to talk this through with my

therapist.


At least there was a quid premium on Frankie!

:-)





Keith G August 4th 04 11:36 PM

Re Valve amps
 

"Tat Chan" wrote in message
...
Keith G wrote:
Firstly, as the OP is in N Wales I think you should be a little less
sheepish, ram your point home a bit harder and qualify your question

thus:
'Tell my why ewe think this is a good idea, if ewe don't hear the amp

first
ewe could get the wool pulled over your eyes and someone will fleece

ewe...'

(Shear common sense for an Ozzie, I would'a thought...??)


uhm, no ... I think the Kiwis would know more about sheep ...

:P



OK, go to http://www.dfmg.com.tw/mirron/wool/austflock.html and see "The
Australian sheep flock now numbers 138.1million head (at March 1993)."

(And that's 10 years old!!!)




The current influx of cheap Chinky amps is both a good and bad thing

(for
^^^^^^

OI!!! I would be careful with using that kind of language ...



Sorry - make that *inexpensive* Chinky amps then..... :-)






Tat Chan August 4th 04 11:57 PM

Re Valve amps
 
Keith G wrote:

"Tat Chan" wrote in message
...


uhm, no ... I think the Kiwis would know more about sheep ...

:P




OK, go to http://www.dfmg.com.tw/mirron/wool/austflock.html and see "The
Australian sheep flock now numbers 138.1million head (at March 1993)."

(And that's 10 years old!!!)


I wasn't refering to numbers, just the stereotype down in Oz about Kiwis
being, uhm, rather attached to their sheep ... I could go on, but it
wouldn't be PC ...

;)



The current influx of cheap Chinky amps is both a good and bad thing


(for

^^^^^^

OI!!! I would be careful with using that kind of language ...


Sorry - make that *inexpensive* Chinky amps then..... :-)


Hmmm, looks like I stuffed up the formatting of the location of my
'^^^^^' characters.

Anyway, the original post was meant to convey my objection to the use of
the term 'Chinky'

Trevor Wilson August 5th 04 03:20 AM

Re Valve amps
 

"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message
...
In article , Trevor Wilson
wrote:

"StaffBull" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the helpful comments below - another question I have is if
I would leave a valve amp on all the time or switch it off and have to
wait for it to warm up every time I need it?


**ALL power amps should be switched off, until they are required for
use. There are several reasons for this: * Leaving an amp switched on,
accelerates wear and tear on several parts. In SS amps, this means
electrolytic caps.


I would quibble a bit with this. :-)


**Perhaps you don't see as many amps with dried out electros, as I do.


IIUC Electrolytic caps also deteriorate if *not* used for prolonged
periods. Provided they are used well within their ratings, being charged

up
means they should have a 'self healing' tendency for minor electronic
leakages. Hence, left unused they may show a fall in capacity and rise in
leakage current. This should recover with use, though.


**Of course. I was assuming that the amp was to be used at least once per
month. That is plenty to keep a cap formed.


Above said, the 'goop' that is inside them does deteriorate with age, use,
and temperature. Hence using them does wear them out. Should be quite a
slow process if they are well built and cautiously rated, though.


**"Should". Yes. In actual fact, however, not necessarily. Manufacturers are
driven to maximise profits. Cheap caps make good sense, in that
environment. Very few manufacturers use 100,000 hour rated caps.


FWIW I just turn on the amps before use, and turn them off afterwards.

Mind
you, I am happy with SS amps, and don't normally notice any signs of
'warming up' over a long period. With a valve amp, I'd probably be

inclined
to switch them on 10 mins before use, and off after use. Dislike leaving
things like this powered up unattended due to the risk of failures. Small
risk probability, but the 'cost' of a house fire can be quite large!

Prefer
peace of mind.


**Good advice.

As usual.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au



Trevor Wilson August 5th 04 03:26 AM

Re Valve amps
 

"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"Trevor Wilson" wrote

**ALL power amps should be switched off, until they are required for

use.
There are several reasons



snipped but agreed with entirely


Tell me again why you would buy an amp, without first listening to it?
Tell my why you think this is a good idea?



OK, Trevor, you're not getting a nibble so I'll respond:

Firstly, as the OP is in N Wales I think you should be a little less
sheepish, ram your point home a bit harder and qualify your question thus:
'Tell my why ewe think this is a good idea, if ewe don't hear the amp

first
ewe could get the wool pulled over your eyes and someone will fleece

ewe...'

(Shear common sense for an Ozzie, I would'a thought...??)


**Heheh. Yep.


:-)

Secondly, it is not easy to get an audition of valve gear in the UK

without
going to an 'audio boutique' which are few and far between and where the
prices are sky-high in any case. Hence a lot of people, looking to get

into
valves are 'taking a flyer' and buying from eBay, the Net, mail order and
secondhand. This is the reason a lot of valvies (me included) have been
willing to invite people in and hear our own valve gear where they can get

a
good listen without any obligation to spend money.


**Sounds like good, common sense to me.


This has been very successful for me and I have had a number of visits

that
have all been very pleasant and have actually ended up with one or two
people buying valve gear. At any rate, no-one has told me yet that they
didn't like valves!! (I have only had one instance where someone appears

to
have been a bit two-faced/indiscrete and that wasn't even a 'valve
auditioner'!)

However, having said all that, I for one am a becoming a bit reluctant to
recommend valves to all and sundry as:

1) The prices will go up as valves become more popular (as they have with
secondhand vinyl, which is now about 10 times more expensive in charity
shops in the UK than it was a couple of years ago....), NOS valves will
disappear more quickly and the increasing popularity will encourage more
crap onto the market. (Offsetting this, of course, is that the same
popularity will ensure better continuity of supply generally....)


**Very possibly. I don't see a major problem, as long as China and Russia
manage to keep their production profitable.


2) Valves take a lot more 'work' than ss gear - normally beyond the scope

of
'box openers' if anything goes wrong. OK if a support structure

establishes
itself - I already know one UK valve amp builder who is doing nicely out

of
fettling cheap, new foreign amps or, as in the case of our own Fleetie,

you
are able to get the spanners out if anything goes tits-up which, of

course,
it can/probably will at some point.....

3) There is also the possibility that the greater danger of valves (heat,
voltages and even the greater weight of valve amps) will result in some
divot getting badly hurt and a great raft of legislation swinging into

place
to control everything that will sweep away the good guys with the bad guys
like it's doing with everything else these days!


**A good point. Those pesky EU regs have even reached our shores.


The current influx of cheap Chinky amps is both a good and bad thing (for
various reasons mentioned above) but I gotta say finally that I have yet

to
hear a valve amp that didn't comprehensively **** all over most ss amps

I've
heard in terms of 'listenability' - ie where the 'music' counts more than
the 'sound quality'......


**And I have yet to hear a CHEAP valve amp which can compete with a
similarly priced, decently engineered SS one. Cheap valve amps are just not
worth bothering with. Their output transformers are pitifully inadequate.
Amongst other things. OTOH, a REALLY GOOD valve amp sounds (and,
incidentally, measures) almost indistinguishable from a really good SS amp.

That should set some alarm bells ringing for those who value reason and
common sense above hyperbole.


(My 2p only....)


**And mine.



Stewart Pinkerton August 5th 04 05:31 AM

Re Valve amps
 
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 20:57:23 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote:

In article ,
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
Anything with a valve in it (including CRTs) shouldn't be permanently
powered up,


It's not so very long ago that all broadcasting equipment was valve, and
plenty was left powered up 24/7. Indeed, a power failure could result in
lots of replacements after it was resumed.
But that equipment was designed for this task - I'm not convinced el
cheapo valve amps are.


Indeed, and early computers with up to 10,000 valves also ran 24/7,
although IIRC they required a valve change every ten minutes! Talk
about a job for life.... :-)
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Stewart Pinkerton August 5th 04 05:37 AM

Re Valve amps
 
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 19:31:33 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:


"Andy Evans" wrote in message
...


I think we bottleheads are ultimately going to become rarities,


That's the point, done right we don't have to be. Plenty of people believe
the valve (OK, triode then... ;-) to be the ultimate 'audio amplifier'
(analogue OR digital) so why should it ever disappear? (What beats a pair of
scissors for cutting stuff, eh??)


What 'plenty of people believe' and reality are not always the same.
Your analogy is poor, since a pair of scissors outperforms other
easily available tools for its designated task. Not so with valve
amps, which are generally poor performers (especially the SET variety)
by any definition of 'high fidelity'.


but the sound
of valves lives on - musicians love them and use them, and a number of musical
listeners, as you say, find they come closest to the sound they find represents
the "musical experience".


Yep.


Most critical listeners however, prefer the sound of SS amps - and
that's unlikely to change. Aside from a couple of 'boutique' studios,
you won't find valve amps used by the people who record or master the
music to which you listen.........................
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Stewart Pinkerton August 5th 04 05:40 AM

Re Valve amps
 
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 19:47:10 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:

"Mike Gilmour" wrote


Many tube amps are weighty but don't forget SS amplifiers are also very
heavy, the big Krells, ML's etc. My own SS amp weighs in at 125 lbs.


I'd bet that most people being tempted by 'budget' valve amps aren't coming
from ss behemoths (some of which are real amps and can sound damn near as
good as valves anyway) but from the ****e little 'flyaway' slices of brushed
aluminium....


I think you have that the wrong way round. A few select valve amps are
real amps, and can sound damn near as good as most SS amps........
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Tat Chan August 5th 04 05:48 AM

Re Valve amps
 
Andy Evans wrote:


I think we bottleheads are ultimately going to become rarities, but the sound
of valves lives on - musicians love them and use them, and a number of musical
listeners, as you say, find they come closest to the sound they find represents
the "musical experience".


If valves are used for musical *production*, then the distortion forms
part of the art (which is fine, since musicians are making new music)

However, for musical *reproduction*, the valves would distort the signal
being reproduced, and taken to its extreme, a valve amp would then act
as a signal processor, wouldn't it?




Wally August 5th 04 09:20 AM

Re Valve amps
 
Tat Chan wrote:

If valves are used for musical *production*, then the distortion forms
part of the art (which is fine, since musicians are making new music)

However, for musical *reproduction*, the valves would distort the
signal being reproduced, and taken to its extreme, a valve amp would
then act as a signal processor, wouldn't it?


The 'extreme', to my mind, is more like a valve guitar amp than a valve hifi
amp.


--
Wally
www.artbywally.com
www.wally.myby.co.uk



Trevor Wilson August 5th 04 09:41 AM

Re Valve amps
 

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 20:57:23 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote:

In article ,
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
Anything with a valve in it (including CRTs) shouldn't be permanently
powered up,


It's not so very long ago that all broadcasting equipment was valve, and
plenty was left powered up 24/7. Indeed, a power failure could result in
lots of replacements after it was resumed.
But that equipment was designed for this task - I'm not convinced el
cheapo valve amps are.


Indeed, and early computers with up to 10,000 valves also ran 24/7,
although IIRC they required a valve change every ten minutes! Talk
about a job for life.... :-)


**My partner dragged out this quote from some computer guy in the 50's. It
went (to paraphrase):
"Sometime, in the future, computers will weigh less than 1.5 Tons."


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au



Keith G August 5th 04 09:48 AM

Re Valve amps
 

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 19:31:33 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:


"Andy Evans" wrote in message
...


I think we bottleheads are ultimately going to become rarities,


That's the point, done right we don't have to be. Plenty of people

believe
the valve (OK, triode then... ;-) to be the ultimate 'audio amplifier'
(analogue OR digital) so why should it ever disappear? (What beats a pair

of
scissors for cutting stuff, eh??)


What 'plenty of people believe' and reality are not always the same.



Agreed - actually I'd go further and say that what most people believe is
*rarely* 'reality'.....


Your analogy is poor, since a pair of scissors outperforms other
easily available tools for its designated task. Not so with valve
amps, which are generally poor performers (especially the SET variety)
by any definition of 'high fidelity'.



OK, what I need is a better analogy which portrays 'just because it's old
(or even the original) it doesn't mean it can't be the best....'



Most critical listeners however, prefer the sound of SS amps - and
that's unlikely to change. Aside from a couple of 'boutique' studios,
you won't find valve amps used by the people who record or master the
music to which you listen.........................



May or not be the case, but with the average age of my record collection I
wouldn't rule it out. But we've been here before, I don't care what
processes/practices/equipment has/have been used to produce the music I'm
playing - I consider that to be an 'end product' (whatever the format). All
I'm concerned about is what results I get with it from my own reproduction
equipment.

(As it happens, valve and ss amps are about Even Stevens in this house atm -
3 of each.....)





Keith G August 5th 04 09:51 AM

Re Valve amps
 

"Tat Chan" wrote in message
...
Andy Evans wrote:


I think we bottleheads are ultimately going to become rarities, but the

sound
of valves lives on - musicians love them and use them, and a number of

musical
listeners, as you say, find they come closest to the sound they find

represents
the "musical experience".


If valves are used for musical *production*, then the distortion forms
part of the art (which is fine, since musicians are making new music)

However, for musical *reproduction*, the valves would distort the signal
being reproduced, and taken to its extreme, a valve amp would then act
as a signal processor, wouldn't it?



This sort of post never fails to amaze me - like ss kit *doesn't* distort
the signal FFS!!!



Keith G August 5th 04 09:58 AM

Re Valve amps
 

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 19:47:10 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:

"Mike Gilmour" wrote


Many tube amps are weighty but don't forget SS amplifiers are also very
heavy, the big Krells, ML's etc. My own SS amp weighs in at 125 lbs.


I'd bet that most people being tempted by 'budget' valve amps aren't

coming
from ss behemoths (some of which are real amps and can sound damn near as
good as valves anyway) but from the ****e little 'flyaway' slices of

brushed
aluminium....


I think you have that the wrong way round. A few select valve amps are
real amps, and can sound damn near as good as most SS amps........



Fine - a different opinion based on a different preferences based on a
different credo....



Don Pearce August 5th 04 10:04 AM

Re Valve amps
 
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:48:27 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:


"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 19:31:33 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:


"Andy Evans" wrote in message
...


I think we bottleheads are ultimately going to become rarities,

That's the point, done right we don't have to be. Plenty of people

believe
the valve (OK, triode then... ;-) to be the ultimate 'audio amplifier'
(analogue OR digital) so why should it ever disappear? (What beats a pair

of
scissors for cutting stuff, eh??)


What 'plenty of people believe' and reality are not always the same.



Agreed - actually I'd go further and say that what most people believe is
*rarely* 'reality'.....

I'd go further and say that once you have used the word "believe" you
have guaranteed that it is untrue. If it was true, you would simply
"know". The difference?...

"Believe" = accept without proof
"Know" = accept on the basis of proof


Your analogy is poor, since a pair of scissors outperforms other
easily available tools for its designated task. Not so with valve
amps, which are generally poor performers (especially the SET variety)
by any definition of 'high fidelity'.



OK, what I need is a better analogy which portrays 'just because it's old
(or even the original) it doesn't mean it can't be the best....'

Extreme danger of "golden-ageism" here.


Most critical listeners however, prefer the sound of SS amps - and
that's unlikely to change. Aside from a couple of 'boutique' studios,
you won't find valve amps used by the people who record or master the
music to which you listen.........................



May or not be the case, but with the average age of my record collection I
wouldn't rule it out. But we've been here before, I don't care what
processes/practices/equipment has/have been used to produce the music I'm
playing - I consider that to be an 'end product' (whatever the format). All
I'm concerned about is what results I get with it from my own reproduction
equipment.

(As it happens, valve and ss amps are about Even Stevens in this house atm -
3 of each.....)



What you like is what you like.

d

Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Don Pearce August 5th 04 10:09 AM

Re Valve amps
 
On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 09:46:23 GMT, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:

**The term: "Pom", is a one of endearment. It should not be taken as an
offensive term. "Pommy *******" is also a term of great endearment. As in:

"Will ya have another beer, you Pommy *******?"

The term: "Whinging Pom" is a very severe insult.

The term: "Tight arsed Scot", is, like the term: "Miserable Scot", merely a
perfectly accurate observation and cannot possibly be taken as terms which
are offensive.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au


Hee hee - I like that.

Actually all insults work strictly on the basis that they are true -
not that they are insulting per se.

I remember once an Aussie being introduced to a few of us, and this
bloke was the most whingeing ******* who ever walked the earth.
Everything was better in Australia. Anyway, sometime during the
evening, somebody - well fed up - just said to him "you're an
Australian, aren't you?". That did it - he went red and stormed out.
I've no doubt he is even now back home telling everybody about this
pommy rudeness.

So insults can't be given - only accepted.

d

Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Keith G August 5th 04 10:22 AM

Re Valve amps
 

"Trevor Wilson" wrote


**And I have yet to hear a CHEAP valve amp which can compete with a
similarly priced, decently engineered SS one. Cheap valve amps are just

not
worth bothering with. Their output transformers are pitifully inadequate.
Amongst other things. OTOH, a REALLY GOOD valve amp sounds (and,
incidentally, measures) almost indistinguishable from a really good SS

amp.


On paper I would agree with you, but I suspect the reality for many people
is that cheap valve amps actually *do* provide the type of sound the
purchaser is looking for. My argument is that it *seems* they are more
likely to play up and that people buying them should be aware of this - not
a problem if the buyer has the skills to sort them out, or there is support
readily available at reasonable prices. (I have to say it appears at least
some of the eBay sellers of cheap amps appear to be ready and willing to
help when necessary....??)

Let's sum this up with an analogy:

You want a car to get about. You got two choices - save up for a long time
to buy a 'respected, reliable' car or you buy summat cheap or secondhand and
*expect* to have to get the spanners out sooner or later. It's that simple
and they way I view the recent influx of cheap amps. You'll never fettle an
old banger into a Bentley but at least it'll whizz around (keeping you dry
when it rains) for most of the time and it's quite likely to be a lot of
fun!

(I would add also that I don't think these cheap amps are quite as bad as
some would have us believe - as usual, I don't think most of the 'knockers'
have ever heard one!)


That should set some alarm bells ringing for those who value reason and
common sense above hyperbole.



But who are not the people buying cheap valve amps, I suspect.....




Trevor Wilson August 5th 04 10:23 AM

Re Valve amps
 

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 01:39:29 GMT, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:


"StaffBull" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the helpful comments below - another question I have is if

I
would leave a valve amp on all the time or switch it off and have to

wait
for it to warm up every time I need it?


**ALL power amps should be switched off, until they are required for use.


Hooey.


**Nope. Fact.


There are several reasons for this:
* Leaving an amp switched on, accelerates wear and tear on several parts.

In
SS amps, this means electrolytic caps. In valve amps, this means valves

and
electrolytic caps.


Hooey. If it's not a class A amp, or otherwise warm inside, it puts
less strain on the caps to leave them switched on. Start-up surges are
a major cause of cap failure.


**Hooey. If a cap is not rated to cope with the switch on of an amp, the
design is faulty. Heat accelerates the wear on ALL electrolytic caps.


My Audiolab 8000P has been switched on for about eight years, and
works just fine. I don't leave the Krell switched on, because it's a
true class A design, and pulls 300 watts from the wall at idle!


**After you replace ALL the electrolytic caps and then tell there is no
sonic, or measurable difference, then I may be prepared to believe you.
After all, we all know (from the experience of valve amp owners) that it is
exceedingly difficult for an amp owner to detect gradual wear on components.
And I do agree, that leaving a hot running amp, permanetly powered (like a
Class A, or valve design) is just dumb. Having said that, it is likely that
your Krell probably uses 105oC rated, computer grade main filter caps
(100,000 hours). I don't know about all the other caps, though. Your
Audiolab uses bog-standard, 85oC rated, 10,000 hour caps. How long is 8
years, again?


* Leaving the amp switched on, leaves the amp open to line surges and
spikes, which may damage equipment.


Only badly designed equipment, and not everywhere has such crappy
mains that this is an issue.


**Some line surges cannot be protected against, even by heroic means.


* Leaving the amp switched on is not environmentally sensitive.


Neither is farting, but I doubt it's a major issue.


**Every bit helps. As they used to say: "Think globally, act locally." Think
of the money, Stewart.


Tell me again why you would buy an amp, without first listening to it?
Tell my why you think this is a good idea?


Seems like a bad idea - much like attempting to drive any decent
speaker with a cheap valve amp, when the same money would buy you a
sonically transparent SS amp.


**Ah, we agree on something.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au



Keith G August 5th 04 10:35 AM

Re Valve amps
 

"Tat Chan" wrote


I wasn't refering to numbers, just the stereotype down in Oz about Kiwis
being, uhm, rather attached to their sheep ... I could go on, but it
wouldn't be PC ...

;)



PC?

Don't worry about it - I don't!

;-)

(We're not all Soft Lads in the UK yet!)


Anyway, the original post was meant to convey my objection to the use of
the term 'Chinky'



Don't take this personally (I'm sure if we met, we'd get on fine) but
ordinarily I'd say 'tough ****, if you don't like it'...!!

(But you're not wrong - technically a 'Chinky' is a Chinese carry-out. :-)





Andy Evans August 5th 04 10:38 AM

Re Valve amps
 
**After you replace ALL the electrolytic caps

What electrolytic caps? Only polypropylene and teflons in my valve amp.

=== Andy Evans ===
Visit our Website:- http://www.artsandmedia.com
Audio, music and health pages and interesting links.

Andy Evans August 5th 04 10:43 AM

Re Valve amps
 
This sort of post never fails to amaze me - like ss kit *doesn't* distort
the signal FFS!!!

Hang on here, Keith - ss kit measures .00000000001% distortion because it's
sonically transparent. Never mind what it sounds like. And anyway, most people
use ss kit so it must be better. Who are we to remain unconvinced by such
arguments.

=== Andy Evans ===
Visit our Website:- http://www.artsandmedia.com
Audio, music and health pages and interesting links.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk