A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Public 128 kbit/s Extension Test



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2 (permalink)  
Old August 4th 03, 11:01 PM posted to alt.music.mp3,rec.audio.misc,uk.rec.audio
Ric
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Public 128 kbit/s Extension Test

So maybe the pertinent question now is: at the lowest quality setting for
each codec that produces a transparent file, which codec has the lowest
average bitrate?

Ric

"ff123" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 05:03:57 GMT, ff123 wrote:

Roberto Amorim announced in various web forums:

"I'd like to announce the start of a public 128kbps blind listening
test, comparing the winner of the AAC test (QuickTime) to Musepack,
Vorbis, WMA Pro and Lame MP3.

For those interested in participating, instructions are available at
the announcement page:
http://rarewares.hydrogenaudio.org/t...sentation.html


The test has closed and the results are now available he

http://audio.ciara.us/test/128extension/results.html

The newer generation of codecs are all on a par with each other,
although still not transparent at 128 kbit/s. MP3 is showing its age.

ff123



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.