A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Audiolab 8000DAC Query



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old September 30th 04, 11:19 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Tat Chan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 418
Default Audiolab 8000DAC Query

Kalman Rubinson wrote:

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:10:20 +1000, Tat Chan
wrote:


The AUD$700 is about half the price of the Benchmark DAC1 (only available here


from a pro audio shop). Still, quite a bit more than what I was willing to pay


(there is an Arcam Alpha 9 on Ebay with a starting bid of AUD$950 ... not a
single bid on that one yet!). Audiolab equipment comes with a huge markup in Oz
(though the prices in South East Asia were equivalent to the UK RRP) for some
reason or other.



I would sooner go for the Arcam Alpha 9 with its RingDAC than add the
Audiolab DAC. The Benchmark is better as well.

Kal



Yes, but I'm wary about purchasing a 2nd hand CD player from people I
don't know. You never know when the laser is going to bite the dust. No
such problems with DACs. Also, I believe adding a DAC will improve the
sound quality from my DVD player for 2-channel sound and will be useful
once I get a digital TV set top box.

And yes, I am aware of the good things that have been said about the
Ring DAC (which has been discarded in favour of Wolfson DACs in the new
CD-33).

  #12 (permalink)  
Old September 30th 04, 11:38 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Kalman Rubinson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 214
Default Audiolab 8000DAC Query

On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:19:39 +1000, Tat Chan
wrote:

And yes, I am aware of the good things that have been said about the
Ring DAC (which has been discarded in favour of Wolfson DACs in the new
CD-33).


............for reasons not necessarily related to sound quality.

Kal

  #13 (permalink)  
Old September 30th 04, 11:39 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Tat Chan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 418
Default Audiolab 8000DAC Query

Kalman Rubinson wrote:

On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:19:39 +1000, Tat Chan
wrote:


And yes, I am aware of the good things that have been said about the
Ring DAC (which has been discarded in favour of Wolfson DACs in the new
CD-33).



...........for reasons not necessarily related to sound quality.

Kal


oh? politics? economics? lack of supply
  #14 (permalink)  
Old October 1st 04, 12:00 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Kalman Rubinson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 214
Default Audiolab 8000DAC Query

Pick any two.

Kal

On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:39:36 +1000, Tat Chan
wrote:

Kalman Rubinson wrote:

On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:19:39 +1000, Tat Chan
wrote:


And yes, I am aware of the good things that have been said about the
Ring DAC (which has been discarded in favour of Wolfson DACs in the new
CD-33).



...........for reasons not necessarily related to sound quality.

Kal


oh? politics? economics? lack of supply


  #15 (permalink)  
Old October 5th 04, 11:50 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Tat Chan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 418
Default Audiolab 8000DAC Query


Well, the auction ended with the DAC going for AUD$680, which was quite a bit
more than what I was willing to pay for something over Ebay.

Thanks to all those who replied to this query.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.