Big Sub
 

http://www.royaldevice.com/custom3.htm


want two lol


--
Dave xxxx
www.davewhitter.myby.co.uk

Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
Steam is Fun

Big Sub
 

"Dave xxxxx" wrote in message
...
http://www.royaldevice.com/custom3.htm


want two lol


Yep, I gotta admit it - that *is* impressive!!! :-)

Big Sub
 

On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:06:54 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:

"Dave xxxxx" wrote in message
k...
http://www.royaldevice.com/custom3.htm


want two lol

Yep, I gotta admit it - that *is* impressive!!! :-)

Not really, as the system would have worked better as an infinite
baffle arrangement, avoiding the need for all that concrete. Nice
technobabble bull****, though.................

--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Big Sub
 

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:06:54 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:

"Dave xxxxx" wrote in message
. uk...
http://www.royaldevice.com/custom3.htm


want two lol

Yep, I gotta admit it - that *is* impressive!!! :-)

Not really, as the system would have worked better as an infinite
baffle arrangement, avoiding the need for all that concrete. Nice
technobabble bull****, though.................


I trust fellow 'sportsmen' here will note that I don't take an easy shot at
this 'low bird'...... ;-)

Big Sub
 

"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:06:54 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:

"Dave xxxxx" wrote in message
.uk...
http://www.royaldevice.com/custom3.htm


want two lol

Yep, I gotta admit it - that *is* impressive!!! :-)

Not really, as the system would have worked better as an infinite
baffle arrangement, avoiding the need for all that concrete. Nice
technobabble bull****, though.................


I trust fellow 'sportsmen' here will note that I don't take an easy shot
at this 'low bird'...... ;-)




:-)

Big Sub
 

"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:06:54 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:

"Dave xxxxx" wrote in message
.uk...
http://www.royaldevice.com/custom3.htm


want two lol

Yep, I gotta admit it - that *is* impressive!!! :-)

Not really, as the system would have worked better as an infinite
baffle arrangement, avoiding the need for all that concrete. Nice
technobabble bull****, though.................


I trust fellow 'sportsmen' here will note that I don't take an easy shot
at this 'low bird'...... ;-)




Best easy shot is with a http://photogallery.net/sub.jpg big sub......

Big Sub
 

On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 23:04:07 +0100, "Mike Gilmour"
wrote:


"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:06:54 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:

"Dave xxxxx" wrote in message
o.uk...
http://www.royaldevice.com/custom3.htm


want two lol

Yep, I gotta admit it - that *is* impressive!!! :-)

Not really, as the system would have worked better as an infinite
baffle arrangement, avoiding the need for all that concrete. Nice
technobabble bull****, though.................


I trust fellow 'sportsmen' here will note that I don't take an easy shot
at this 'low bird'...... ;-)

Best easy shot is with a http://photogallery.net/sub.jpg big sub......

When the not quite infinite baffles go down on that one, it leaves a
big hole in the ocean............. :-)

Shame that Keith doesn't understand cabin gain, and compression ratios
in horns, but then there's so much about audio that Keith obviously
doesn't understand......... :-)
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Big Sub
 

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 23:04:07 +0100, "Mike Gilmour"
wrote:


"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:06:54 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:

"Dave xxxxx" wrote in message
. co.uk...
http://www.royaldevice.com/custom3.htm


want two lol

Yep, I gotta admit it - that *is* impressive!!! :-)

Not really, as the system would have worked better as an infinite
baffle arrangement, avoiding the need for all that concrete. Nice
technobabble bull****, though.................


I trust fellow 'sportsmen' here will note that I don't take an easy shot
at this 'low bird'...... ;-)

Best easy shot is with a http://photogallery.net/sub.jpg big sub......

When the not quite infinite baffles go down on that one, it leaves a
big hole in the ocean............. :-)

Shame that Keith doesn't understand cabin gain, and compression ratios
in horns, but then there's so much about audio that Keith obviously
doesn't understand......... :-)


No shame at all.

My 'audio learning curve' is not much longer than my subscription to this
group and I'm here to learn - never claimed any different and never made a
secret of it.

The real shame is that this group's not really up to it - all one can expect
here is an endless torrent of the same, meaningless, bigotted yap from a
very small minority (1.5 clowns) who have nothing useful to offer other than
pounce on every post and try to turn it into some sort of knob-waving
session. The biggest mystery to me is why do I continue to subscribe when,
even as I type, I have better things to do??? (A bit different in the
evening when I'm usually listening to music at the same time and I'm in the
mood for a litle mischief.... :-)

Thankfully, there are a multitude of seriously interesting and informative
sites on the Web like this one:

http://www.nutshellhifi.com/triode1.html

Read it carefully and you might learn something.

You will also see "Putting it less kindly, the good engineers went into the
commercial, instrumentation, and military sectors, while the not-so-good
engineers went into the high-fidelity business." Where does that leave
'self-styled wannabees' that are not 'engineers' at all, but work in places
like banks, sweeping up or whatever???

(Out of interest, my brother is a real engineer who has worked in the
aerospace industry all his life - BAC/BAe and currently Matra Marconi......)

Big Sub
 

"Mike Gilmour" wrote in message
...

"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:06:54 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:

"Dave xxxxx" wrote in message
o.uk...
http://www.royaldevice.com/custom3.htm


want two lol

Yep, I gotta admit it - that *is* impressive!!! :-)

Not really, as the system would have worked better as an infinite
baffle arrangement, avoiding the need for all that concrete. Nice
technobabble bull****, though.................


I trust fellow 'sportsmen' here will note that I don't take an easy shot
at this 'low bird'...... ;-)




Best easy shot is with a http://photogallery.net/sub.jpg big sub......


I've been contemplating building a sub, but not quite on this scale!!! ;-)

Big Sub
 

"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"Mike Gilmour" wrote in message
...

"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:06:54 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:

"Dave xxxxx" wrote in message
. co.uk...
http://www.royaldevice.com/custom3.htm


want two lol

Yep, I gotta admit it - that *is* impressive!!! :-)

Not really, as the system would have worked better as an infinite
baffle arrangement, avoiding the need for all that concrete. Nice
technobabble bull****, though.................


I trust fellow 'sportsmen' here will note that I don't take an easy shot
at this 'low bird'...... ;-)




Best easy shot is with a http://photogallery.net/sub.jpg big sub......


I've been contemplating building a sub, but not quite on this scale!!!
;-)



I remember an article in one of the UK mags some years ago, can't remember
which ... of a guy in Wales who specialised in concrete underfloor subwoofer
builds :-)