"Uncle Keith" wrote in message
...
In article , Don Pearce
wrote:

Question - I know the CD player technology has moved on a fair pace
since I bought my Alpha 5, but I can't decide between these two players
- The now discontinued Diva CD82 and the new Diva CD73. I can get them
both for about the same price, and although the 82 is now discontinued,
I've been offered a brand new model with two year guarantee, but how
much better than the 73 is the older 82?

Anyone on here auditioned them both? I have read one review of 82 v 72
where the 82 came out well on top, but how much has the 73 improved?

Many thank's

These days you buy CD players on features and looks - I'm pretty
certain you couldn't tell the difference between your Alpha 5 and
anything newer just by listening.

d
Pearce Consulting

How do you work that one out?
I could certainly hear the difference between different models when I
bought my Alpha 5 - Or are you saying that the Alpha 5 was such a good
model then that nothing has improved on it?

I agree with you Keith as when I also bought my Arcam 5 CD player I too
auditioned several models and found that there was quite a difference
between them. I even auditioned the Delta 270, which used the same Philips
CDM-9 laser but it did actually sound just slightly more defined than the
Arcam 5. Which goes to prove that both the laser and the electronics make a
difference. Unfortunately I couldn't afford the extra £300 for the Delta 270
at the time.

I still have my trusty old Arcam 5 CD and it's still sounding very sweet
through a Delta 290 amp and Tannoy Mercury speakers. A vast improvement was
made to the sound last year by changing to QED Qunex 2 interconnects and QED
Silver Anniversary speaker cables. Wow, what a difference in ten years of
cable development making the system sound like a newly upgraded one.

The best way to know which one to buy is to go listen to both and judge for
yourself which is the better sound for you.


Stephen

Stephen wrote:

I still have my trusty old Arcam 5 CD and it's still sounding very
sweet through a Delta 290 amp and Tannoy Mercury speakers. A vast
improvement was made to the sound last year by changing to QED Qunex
2 interconnects and QED Silver Anniversary speaker cables. Wow, what
a difference in ten years of cable development making the system
sound like a newly upgraded one.

What cables were you using before?


--
Wally
www.artbywally.com
www.wally.myby.co.uk

"Wally" wrote in message
...
Stephen wrote:

I still have my trusty old Arcam 5 CD and it's still sounding very
sweet through a Delta 290 amp and Tannoy Mercury speakers. A vast
improvement was made to the sound last year by changing to QED Qunex
2 interconnects and QED Silver Anniversary speaker cables. Wow, what
a difference in ten years of cable development making the system
sound like a newly upgraded one.

What cables were you using before?


The interconnects were some high quality OFC the make of which I forget as I
lost the packaging but supplied by a good hi-fi dealer. They were
considerably thicker than the normal bog standard phono leads but nowhere
near the QED ones. The speaker cables where the QED 79 strand which was
fairly standard over ten years ago as the Silver Anniversary ones are now.

Interestingly someone I know also replaced his 79 strand with the Silver
Anniversary cables shortly after me but he changed back as he didn't like
the sound. He told me that for him the new cables made it sound too bright
at the high end for him. That's why you need to listen to anything as
everyone has different perceptions of what they like a system to sound.

Personally I wouldn't go back but I have noticed that it emphasises the
master tape hiss in very old recordings.


Stephen

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:33:07 GMT, "Stephen"
wrote:

A vast improvement was
made to the sound last year by changing to QED Qunex 2 interconnects and QED
Silver Anniversary speaker cables. Wow, what a difference in ten years of
cable development making the system sound like a newly upgraded one.

Here we go.... sigh!

I'm outta here.

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Hi,

In message , Don Pearce
writes
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:33:07 GMT, "Stephen"
wrote:

A vast improvement was
made to the sound last year by changing to QED Qunex 2 interconnects and QED
Silver Anniversary speaker cables. Wow, what a difference in ten years of
cable development making the system sound like a newly upgraded one.

Here we go.... sigh!

I'm outta here.

Don't shut the door, I'm right behind you...

--
Regards,
Glenn Booth

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:40:40 +0100, Glenn Booth
wrote:

Hi,

In message , Don Pearce
writes
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:33:07 GMT, "Stephen"
wrote:

A vast improvement was
made to the sound last year by changing to QED Qunex 2 interconnects and QED
Silver Anniversary speaker cables. Wow, what a difference in ten years of
cable development making the system sound like a newly upgraded one.

Here we go.... sigh!

I'm outta here.

Don't shut the door, I'm right behind you...

Cable looney alert! Close the door, throw the bolts...............

--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Stewart Pinkerton wrote:

Here we go.... sigh!

I'm outta here.

Don't shut the door, I'm right behind you...


Cable looney alert! Close the door, throw the bolts...............

Wait for me

Stephen wrote:

Which goes to prove that both the laser and the electronics make a
difference.

OMFG. that one tops it all - you can hear the difference between
different LASERS in a CD player?

Given a working laser, and identical output (ie. unprocessed output via
the same external DAC) I'll give you a straight grand if you can
reliably demonstrate your ability to hear the difference.

Hi,

In message , Ian Molton
writes
Stephen wrote:

Which goes to prove that both the laser and the electronics make a
difference.

OMFG. that one tops it all - you can hear the difference between
different LASERS in a CD player?

It would be a pretty cool trick, considering that all the data read from
a CD is buffered into memory before being fed to the DAC. I can't say
I've ever heard anyone claim that before.

--
Regards,
Glenn Booth