Any great unknown speaker brands?
 

In article ,
Chris Morriss wrote:

In message , MINe
109 writes
In article , Newbie
wrote:

Stewart Pinkerton wrote:

: I had 104s, and I can assure you that he will have no troble at all in
: this regard. Given our new knowledge of his budget, I'd suggest a hard
: look at the B&W N804, the Spendor S9 and the JMLab Elektra range. Also
: of course the incomparable Quad 988/989 for a completely different
: experience.

Hello Stewart. I appreciate your suggestions. However, I live a small
(expensive but tiny!) big-city apartment. The Quads are out of the
question! I suppose the speakers could be tall, but must have a small
footprint.

One general question I can't even articulate well goes like this: If
you have very good speakers of this age (my KEF's, or BC-1s, Rogers,
etc.), with no obvious breakdown, just old age, is it better to get
them "reconditioned", or has the speaker technology improved so much
that one should replace them?

Are you dissatisfied with the sound? There could be a simple fix by
repositioning them or using room treatments. Maybe you could tell us
about the room: hard floors, high ceilings, square footage, that kind of
thing.

Anyway, what are the best "sleek" speakers that don't need much floor
space?

The Magneplanar 1.6 are tall but only 19" wide and 2" deep.

But they need about 1.5 metres of space behind them!

Nah, just angle them at 45 degrees to the back wall...

Okay, just kidding. It wouldn't be unusual to have a stand-mounted
speaker that far into the room. I do think there are advantages to
near-wall placement as often found in British speakers (like my tv
system Linn Kabers) or the Allisons mentioned earlier that I know by
reputation and a recent review in Absolute Sound.

Stephen

Stephen

Any great unknown speaker brands?
 

On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 21:20:08 GMT, "Fleetie"
wrote:

Anyway, what are the best "sleek" speakers that don't need much floor
space?

The Magneplanar 1.6 are tall but only 19" wide and 2" deep.

Stephen

But they need about 1.5 metres of space behind them!
--
Chris Morriss

And a Krell to drive them?

No, despite urban mythology, they're an easy load, but they do need
*lots* of power. One of the big Rotels or NADs is probably the ideal
partner.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Any great unknown speaker brands?
 

Stewart Pinkerton said:

The Magneplanar 1.6 are tall but only 19" wide and 2" deep.

But they need about 1.5 metres of space behind them!

And a Krell to drive them?

No, despite urban mythology, they're an easy load, but they do need
*lots* of power. One of the big Rotels or NADs is probably the ideal
partner.

I have no problems driving paralleled Maggies with a homebrew hybrid
tube/MOSFET amp that puts out ~20 volts rms. The power supply is
800VA. And then some people say power supplies aren't important :-)
That's "50 watts in 8 ohms". The Maggies are MG1 improved and SMG-A.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

Michael McKelvy wrote:

The only reason IMO to go with Sonus Faber is looks, since the sound the
impart can be gotten in other brands or in kits.

"As to speakers, they are the weakest link in the audio chain sinc e
they are subject to room interaction and the fact that designs and
drivers ahve gross differences from manufacturer to manufacturer"

:)

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

Michael McKelvy wrote:




First lets deal with falsehood of anybody saying all CD players and amps
sound the same. It is that all CD players working the way tehy are supposed
to sound the same.



This is just hilarious. :) He says that it is a falsehood that anynody
says a given, then RIGHT AFTERWARDS he says it himself..! :)


If you have 2 CD players and one sounds different, one
is either malfunctioning or designed to sound someway other than flat.


Well I sure wouldn't want my CD player to sound flat! :) I guess I'll go
with the "malfunctioning" ones!



Same for amps.


Thus spake ze god of audio-physics, ze force of knowing it all..
Resistance is futile!

:)

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

Fella said:

Thus spake ze god of audio-physics, ze force of knowing it all..

Real gods don't need to have the spittle wiped off their chins.

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

George M. Middius wrote:


Fella said:


Thus spake ze god of audio-physics, ze force of knowing it all..


Real gods don't need to have the spittle wiped off their chins.


And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this mikey
boy.. For instance he writes that something or other had happened "to
late" or that it was "to little" etc.. Typical trailer park DUH! white
trash english. :) Can't be a typo since he makes the same mistake over
and over again in the same thread.

But then again "to late" and "too late" *sounds* the same.

PS: I bet it's the same guy with the sign that read: "Get a brain!
MORANS GO USA!" :)

http://www.esreality.com/files/place...843-morans.jpg

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

Fella said:

[Mikey]
PS: I bet it's the same guy with the sign that read: "Get a brain!
MORANS GO USA!" :)

http://www.esreality.com/files/place...843-morans.jpg


That reminds me of this picture. It purports to show Mikey and his
comrade Geostynch unwinding after a hard day of debating-trading.

http://www.geocities.com/glanbrok/RA...and_Blobbo.jpg

They look just like Mikey and Styncho sound.

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:


And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this mikey
boy.

I think that's "tongue". Also "better than".
..

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

paul packer wrote:
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:



And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this mikey
boy.


I think that's "tongue". Also "better than".
.

Typos will be typos. Is that asking "to much"?

Besides, english is definitely not my mother tongue.

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:52:01 +0200, Fella wrote:

paul packer wrote:
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:



And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this mikey
boy.


I think that's "tongue". Also "better than".
.

Typos will be typos. Is that asking "to much"?

Besides, english is definitely not my mother tongue.

You mean your mother tounge, don't you?

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

paul packer wrote:

On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:52:01 +0200, Fella wrote:


paul packer wrote:

On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:




And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this mikey
boy.


I think that's "tongue". Also "better than".
.

Typos will be typos. Is that asking "to much"?

Besides, english is definitely not my mother tongue.


You mean your mother tounge, don't you?

No, I mean tongue. Listen, you be gettin on my nerves boi.. I be slappin
you silly if yous gunna keep this up.

Anyways .. I do not pretend to know .. or rather, I do not deem that
thousands of different equipment all over the world are "malfunctioning"
based on crude, borg-like, limited preconceptions and misconceptions.
And this about equipment I've never even heard, or heard of (!) much
less measured. :)

If I would boast such god like qualities, well, perhaps then I shouldn't
be making typos either. Now, taking spare time work and writing a quick
two or three articles here, just for the sake of contribution, I make a
typo here and there in the process, I repeat the question: is that
asking "to much" ??? :)

There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours,
figures... since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore), the
patronizing idiot krooger, etc, who think that equipped with some pink
noise and an oscilloscope they can put out instructions as to what a
standart CD player, amp, lamp cord speaker cable, etc, should be. In the
process these fruitcakes call other people "delusional" etc, and act
god-like.

It's just satisfying, and nice, and funny, and OK and lets off some
steem to ridicule such folk. :)

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 13:43:23 +0200, Fella wrote:

There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours,
figures... since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore)

There's some interesting logic lurking here. In what way do I deserve
to be lumped with Ferstler, McKelvy and Krueger? In what way does my
being 'some sort of a bore' (whatever that may mean) preclude my
writing an 'article' (whatever that may be)?

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

paul packer wrote:
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 13:43:23 +0200, Fella wrote:


There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours,
figures... since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore)


There's some interesting logic lurking here. In what way do I deserve
to be lumped with Ferstler, McKelvy and Krueger?

Like I said I haven't read any of the *articles* that you might have
posted on RAO up to now.

But went through some 10-15 of your articles just now, and found you to
be vain, smug, patronizing, argumentative, and mostly demogogic. your
vain, patronizing attitude and the way you throw fished-from-a-thesaurus
words around indicate that you are after some sort of a compensation for
your "exceptional mediocrity" (oxymoron? No, not inyour case.) ...

All this makes you a bit of a bore, a some sort of a bore, that is, you
*are* boring, yes, no doubt about that, but you make it hard for
sensible people to pin you down. But yes, you *can* be "lumped" with the
ferstler, krooger, etc, bunch, since you are, in the end, a bore, read:
boooooooriiing..

You don't have wood for ears though.

In what way does my
being 'some sort of a bore' (whatever that may mean)

Read above. And dully snap back with some snappy question for an answer,
thank you. :)


preclude my
writing an 'article' (whatever that may be)?

An article is what one posts on a newsgroup in the usenet. Now, if you
would like more clarification and definitions as to what might be a
"newsgroup", a "post", or the "usenet" etc, then I suggest you dully
snap back with a smug little question, clipping all else essential and
quoting some minor detail, as in: "usenet, do enlighten us fella, what
might be this usenet?" :)

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

"Fella" wrote in message
.. .
Michael McKelvy wrote:




First lets deal with falsehood of anybody saying all CD players and amps
sound the same. It is that all CD players working the way tehy are
supposed to sound the same.



This is just hilarious. :) He says that it is a falsehood that anynody
says a given, then RIGHT AFTERWARDS he says it himself..! :)


If you have 2 CD players and one sounds different, one is either
malfunctioning or designed to sound someway other than flat.


Well I sure wouldn't want my CD player to sound flat! :) I guess I'll go
with the "malfunctioning" ones!


Then you don't understand the term flat as intended here.

Same for amps.


Thus spake ze god of audio-physics, ze force of knowing it all..
Resistance is futile!


Rsistance to truth is, yep.
:)

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


Fella said:

Thus spake ze god of audio-physics, ze force of knowing it all..

Real gods don't need to have the spittle wiped off their chins.



A case of Kleenex is on it's way to you.

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

"paul packer" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:


And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this mikey
boy.

I think that's "tongue". Also "better than".
.
Touché.

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

"Fella" wrote in message
...
paul packer wrote:

On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:52:01 +0200, Fella wrote:


paul packer wrote:

On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:




And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this
mikey boy.


I think that's "tongue". Also "better than". .

Typos will be typos. Is that asking "to much"?

Besides, english is definitely not my mother tongue.


You mean your mother tounge, don't you?

No, I mean tongue. Listen, you be gettin on my nerves boi.. I be slappin
you silly if yous gunna keep this up.

Anyways .

Anyways????????????// Argh! Anyway.

.. I do not pretend to know .. or rather, I do not deem that
thousands of different equipment all over the world are "malfunctioning"
based on crude, borg-like, limited preconceptions and misconceptions.

How about base on numerous meansurements and listnening comparisons?

And this about equipment I've never even heard, or heard of (!) much less
measured. :)

If I would boast such god like qualities, well, perhaps then I shouldn't
be making typos either. Now, taking spare time work and writing a quick

It's not God like abilities, it's science.

two or three articles here, just for the sake of contribution, I make a
typo here and there in the process, I repeat the question: is that asking
"to much" ??? :)

Way too much.

There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours, figures...
since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore), the patronizing idiot
krooger, etc, who think that equipped with some pink noise and an
oscilloscope they can put out instructions as to what a standart CD
player, amp, lamp cord speaker cable, etc, should be. In the

Thanks for demonstrating that facts mean nothing to you. Proof! Who needs
proof?

process these fruitcakes call other people "delusional" etc, and act
god-like.


It's not acting God like to understnad the thresholds of human hearing and
know that the measurements and listening comparisons mean what they mean.
Properly functioining CD players not designed to alter the Frequency
response from flat, sound the same as each other.

It's just satisfying, and nice, and funny, and OK and lets off some steem
to ridicule such folk. :)

If you get your kicks by making statements that don't reflect the reality of
the science of audio, it's you who set yourself up for ridicule.

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

****, this thread has drifted.

The first speakers I "fell in love with" were Spendor SP2s.

I ended up getting SP1s though. This was 88/89. Kept the SP1s
until '97, when some scally burglar burgled them.

Those Spendor bass units sure had some excursion!

The sticky gloopy stuff painted on them was a bit weird though. What was
all that about? ISTR I used to know, or had at least read something, but
I've forgotten now.



Martin
--
M.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967 110890
Manchester, U.K. http://www.fleetie.demon.co.uk

Any great unknown speaker brands?
 

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:28:20 +0100, "Mike Gilmour"
wrote:


"Fleetie" wrote in message
...
"MINe 109" wrote
(Still remember listening at nearly top volume to Metallica "One" on
NS-1000Ms with a Quad 606 in the late 80s in the dem room at Chatham
Sevenoaks Hi-Fi, where I had a part-time job back then, after we'd
shut the shop. Our ears nearly bled!)

I've seen them, but have never heard them.

They (NS-1000M) were noted for being efficient *and* being able to take
high power.


Martin
--
M.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967
110890
Manchester, U.K.
http://www.fleetie.demon.co.uk


Yes but in pro situations they blew tweeters like no tomorrow, I was told
that on average 6 tweeters were subsequently provided to pro-owners for a
pair within the ownership period. The trick to calm the ear bleeding
treble was a sheet of soft toilet paper over the tweeters. True engineering

Actually, the trick in both cases was to turn the amp up to 9 rather
than to 11.........

It was indeed true engineering, and the tweeter 'problem' explains why
almost all 'sound engineers' are prematurely deaf! As can be heard on
most modern pop records................ :-(
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

I usually do not top post. But for an exceptional "get-a-brain-moran"
such as yourself, I'll make an exception: Your science is limited, your
understanding of the depths of the human ear perception is limited, your
measurements are limited, your so called listening tests are limited, a
flat frequency response does not even begin to tell the story when it
comes to *music* (NOT pink noise) .. etc.

And who am I telling all this to? A "get-a-brain-moran" .. Sheeeeeeesh,
I should get a brain..




Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message
...

paul packer wrote:


On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:52:01 +0200, Fella wrote:



paul packer wrote:


On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:





And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this
mikey boy.


I think that's "tongue". Also "better than". .

Typos will be typos. Is that asking "to much"?

Besides, english is definitely not my mother tongue.


You mean your mother tounge, don't you?

No, I mean tongue. Listen, you be gettin on my nerves boi.. I be slappin
you silly if yous gunna keep this up.

Anyways .


Anyways????????????// Argh! Anyway.

. I do not pretend to know .. or rather, I do not deem that

thousands of different equipment all over the world are "malfunctioning"
based on crude, borg-like, limited preconceptions and misconceptions.


How about base on numerous meansurements and listnening comparisons?


And this about equipment I've never even heard, or heard of (!) much less
measured. :)

If I would boast such god like qualities, well, perhaps then I shouldn't
be making typos either. Now, taking spare time work and writing a quick


It's not God like abilities, it's science.


two or three articles here, just for the sake of contribution, I make a
typo here and there in the process, I repeat the question: is that asking
"to much" ??? :)


Way too much.


There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours, figures...
since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore), the patronizing idiot
krooger, etc, who think that equipped with some pink noise and an
oscilloscope they can put out instructions as to what a standart CD
player, amp, lamp cord speaker cable, etc, should be. In the


Thanks for demonstrating that facts mean nothing to you. Proof! Who needs
proof?


process these fruitcakes call other people "delusional" etc, and act
god-like.



It's not acting God like to understnad the thresholds of human hearing and
know that the measurements and listening comparisons mean what they mean.
Properly functioining CD players not designed to alter the Frequency
response from flat, sound the same as each other.


It's just satisfying, and nice, and funny, and OK and lets off some steem
to ridicule such folk. :)


If you get your kicks by making statements that don't reflect the reality of
the science of audio, it's you who set yourself up for ridicule.

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 10:43:25 +0200, Fella wrote:


I usually do not top post. But for an exceptional "get-a-brain-moran"
such as yourself, I'll make an exception: Your science is limited, your
understanding of the depths of the human ear perception is limited, your
measurements are limited, your so called listening tests are limited, a
flat frequency response does not even begin to tell the story when it
comes to *music* (NOT pink noise) .. etc.

And who am I telling all this to? A "get-a-brain-moran" .. Sheeeeeeesh,
I should get a brain..

His name is McKelvy, not Moran.

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

Don Pearce wrote:
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 10:43:25 +0200, Fella wrote:


I usually do not top post. But for an exceptional "get-a-brain-moran"
such as yourself, I'll make an exception: Your science is limited, your
understanding of the depths of the human ear perception is limited, your
measurements are limited, your so called listening tests are limited, a
flat frequency response does not even begin to tell the story when it
comes to *music* (NOT pink noise) .. etc.

And who am I telling all this to? A "get-a-brain-moran" .. Sheeeeeeesh,
I should get a brain..


His name is McKelvy, not Moran.


The depth of your observational and perceptional skills never cease to
amaze. :)

What _I_ am observing is that borgs are gathering around, teaming up,
protecting each other.

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 11:34:53 +0200, Fella wrote:


Don Pearce wrote:
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 10:43:25 +0200, Fella wrote:


I usually do not top post. But for an exceptional "get-a-brain-moran"
such as yourself, I'll make an exception: Your science is limited, your
understanding of the depths of the human ear perception is limited, your
measurements are limited, your so called listening tests are limited, a
flat frequency response does not even begin to tell the story when it
comes to *music* (NOT pink noise) .. etc.

And who am I telling all this to? A "get-a-brain-moran" .. Sheeeeeeesh,
I should get a brain..


His name is McKelvy, not Moran.


The depth of your observational and perceptional skills never cease to
amaze. :)

What _I_ am observing is that borgs are gathering around, teaming up,
protecting each other.

What has that to do with you calling him Moran, when his name is
McKelvy?

Or did you perhaps mean that he is a moron?

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

Don Pearce wrote:
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 11:34:53 +0200, Fella wrote:


Don Pearce wrote:

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 10:43:25 +0200, Fella wrote:



I usually do not top post. But for an exceptional "get-a-brain-moran"
such as yourself, I'll make an exception: Your science is limited, your
understanding of the depths of the human ear perception is limited, your
measurements are limited, your so called listening tests are limited, a
flat frequency response does not even begin to tell the story when it
comes to *music* (NOT pink noise) .. etc.

And who am I telling all this to? A "get-a-brain-moran" .. Sheeeeeeesh,
I should get a brain..


His name is McKelvy, not Moran.


The depth of your observational and perceptional skills never cease to
amaze. :)

What _I_ am observing is that borgs are gathering around, teaming up,
protecting each other.


What has that to do with you calling him Moran, when his name is
McKelvy?

Or did you perhaps mean that he is a moron?


He is much more than a moron. He is a "get-a-brain-moran" .. There is a
subtle, yet *very* important difference.

But since you wouldn't be able measure it with an oscilloscope, it
wouldn't exist for you.

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 11:59:22 +0200, Fella wrote:

He is much more than a moron. He is a "get-a-brain-moran" .. There is a
subtle, yet *very* important difference.

But since you wouldn't be able measure it with an oscilloscope, it
wouldn't exist for you.

But please, who is this "moran"? As far as I know it is a name of
Irish origin. I've never come across it in any other context.

And what do oscilloscopes have to do with it? You have confused me.

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

Don Pearce said:

But please, who is this "moran"? As far as I know it is a name of
Irish origin. I've never come across it in any other context.

Pull the plug, Donny. You've crossed into that neverland known as
"beating a dead 'borg".

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 11:34:53 +0200, Fella wrote:


What _I_ am observing is that borgs are gathering around, teaming up,
protecting each other.

Yah. We be gonna get you, fella, we is.

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 07:01:29 -0500, George M. Middius
wrote:



Don Pearce said:

But please, who is this "moran"? As far as I know it is a name of
Irish origin. I've never come across it in any other context.

Pull the plug, Donny. You've crossed into that neverland known as
"beating a dead 'borg".



Good advice - plug pulled.

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

paul packer wrote:
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 11:34:53 +0200, Fella wrote:



What _I_ am observing is that borgs are gathering around, teaming up,
protecting each other.


Yah. We be gonna get you, fella, we is.


Yeah! It's like that movie, night of the living dead, the BW one, you
will note. But it's *more* like "Night of the Day of the Dawn of the Son
of the Bride of the Return of the Terror". As it were.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0230575/

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 15:33:00 +0200, Fella wrote:

Don Pearce wrote:
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 07:01:29 -0500, George M. Middius
wrote:



Don Pearce said:


But please, who is this "moran"? As far as I know it is a name of
Irish origin. I've never come across it in any other context.

Pull the plug, Donny. You've crossed into that neverland known as
"beating a dead 'borg".




Good advice - plug pulled.

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Come on Middius, I wanted to slap'm silly some more! :)

You need to be somewhere close, or you're just slapping air :-)

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

Fella said:

But please, who is this "moran"? As far as I know it is a name of
Irish origin. I've never come across it in any other context.

Pull the plug, Donny. You've crossed into that neverland known as
"beating a dead 'borg".

Good advice - plug pulled.

Come on Middius, I wanted to slap'm silly some more! :)

The little needle should point straight up. That's how you know which
direction is north.

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

Don Pearce wrote:
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 15:33:00 +0200, Fella wrote:


Don Pearce wrote:

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 07:01:29 -0500, George M. Middius
wrote:



Don Pearce said:



But please, who is this "moran"? As far as I know it is a name of
Irish origin. I've never come across it in any other context.

Pull the plug, Donny. You've crossed into that neverland known as
"beating a dead 'borg".




Good advice - plug pulled.

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Come on Middius, I wanted to slap'm silly some more! :)


You need to be somewhere close, or you're just slapping air :-)



You borgish entities take everything so literally. ;\





d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 16:28:32 +0200, Fella wrote:

Don Pearce wrote:
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 15:33:00 +0200, Fella wrote:


Don Pearce wrote:

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 07:01:29 -0500, George M. Middius
wrote:



Don Pearce said:



But please, who is this "moran"? As far as I know it is a name of
Irish origin. I've never come across it in any other context.

Pull the plug, Donny. You've crossed into that neverland known as
"beating a dead 'borg".




Good advice - plug pulled.

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Come on Middius, I wanted to slap'm silly some more! :)


You need to be somewhere close, or you're just slapping air :-)



You borgish entities take everything so literally. ;\



And George told me that I was beating a dad borg. Oh well, if I knew
what one of those was, I could make some sort of comment.

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

Don Pearce wrote:
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 16:28:32 +0200, Fella wrote:


Don Pearce wrote:

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 15:33:00 +0200, Fella wrote:



Don Pearce wrote:


On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 07:01:29 -0500, George M. Middius
wrote:




Don Pearce said:




But please, who is this "moran"? As far as I know it is a name of
Irish origin. I've never come across it in any other context.

Pull the plug, Donny. You've crossed into that neverland known as
"beating a dead 'borg".




Good advice - plug pulled.

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Come on Middius, I wanted to slap'm silly some more! :)


You need to be somewhere close, or you're just slapping air :-)



You borgish entities take everything so literally. ;\




And George told me that I was beating a dad borg. Oh well, if I knew
what one of those was, I could make some sort of comment.



Ok so you're a dad, congrats! But why you be goin beatin yourself around?


d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

Don Pearce said:

And George told me that I was beating a dad borg. Oh well, if I knew
what one of those was, I could make some sort of comment.

It's a know-it-when-you-see-it kind of thing. Like bad taste.

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

Fella wrote:

And who am I telling all this to? A "get-a-brain-moran" .. Sheeeeeeesh,
I should get a brain..

If you got-a-brain you would know-how-to-spell the word moron.

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

Ian Molton wrote:
Fella wrote:

And who am I telling all this to? A "get-a-brain-moran" ..
Sheeeeeeesh, I should get a brain..


If you got-a-brain you would know-how-to-spell the word moron.

Another DUH!bya bush supporter pounding his chest?

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 15:14:23 +0000, Ian Molton wrote:

Fella wrote:

And who am I telling all this to? A "get-a-brain-moran" .. Sheeeeeeesh,
I should get a brain..

If you got-a-brain you would know-how-to-spell the word moron.

But you gotta remember that his surname is Tio.....
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio models
 

On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 17:39:42 +0000 (UTC), Stewart Pinkerton
wrote:

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 15:14:23 +0000, Ian Molton wrote:

Fella wrote:

And who am I telling all this to? A "get-a-brain-moran" .. Sheeeeeeesh,
I should get a brain..

If you got-a-brain you would know-how-to-spell the word moron.

But you gotta remember that his surname is Tio.....

You are such a cunning linguist!

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com