George M. Middius wrote:


Fella said:


Thus spake ze god of audio-physics, ze force of knowing it all..


Real gods don't need to have the spittle wiped off their chins.


And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this mikey
boy.. For instance he writes that something or other had happened "to
late" or that it was "to little" etc.. Typical trailer park DUH! white
trash english. Can't be a typo since he makes the same mistake over
and over again in the same thread.

But then again "to late" and "too late" *sounds* the same.

PS: I bet it's the same guy with the sign that read: "Get a brain!
MORANS GO USA!"

http://www.esreality.com/files/place...843-morans.jpg

Fella said:

[Mikey]
PS: I bet it's the same guy with the sign that read: "Get a brain!
MORANS GO USA!"

http://www.esreality.com/files/place...843-morans.jpg


That reminds me of this picture. It purports to show Mikey and his
comrade Geostynch unwinding after a hard day of debating-trading.

http://www.geocities.com/glanbrok/RA...and_Blobbo.jpg

They look just like Mikey and Styncho sound.

On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:


And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this mikey
boy.

I think that's "tongue". Also "better than".
..

paul packer wrote:
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:



And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this mikey
boy.


I think that's "tongue". Also "better than".
.

Typos will be typos. Is that asking "to much"?

Besides, english is definitely not my mother tongue.

On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:52:01 +0200, Fella wrote:

paul packer wrote:
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:



And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this mikey
boy.


I think that's "tongue". Also "better than".
.

Typos will be typos. Is that asking "to much"?

Besides, english is definitely not my mother tongue.

You mean your mother tounge, don't you?

paul packer wrote:

On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:52:01 +0200, Fella wrote:


paul packer wrote:

On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:




And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this mikey
boy.


I think that's "tongue". Also "better than".
.

Typos will be typos. Is that asking "to much"?

Besides, english is definitely not my mother tongue.


You mean your mother tounge, don't you?

No, I mean tongue. Listen, you be gettin on my nerves boi.. I be slappin
you silly if yous gunna keep this up.

Anyways .. I do not pretend to know .. or rather, I do not deem that
thousands of different equipment all over the world are "malfunctioning"
based on crude, borg-like, limited preconceptions and misconceptions.
And this about equipment I've never even heard, or heard of (!) much
less measured.

If I would boast such god like qualities, well, perhaps then I shouldn't
be making typos either. Now, taking spare time work and writing a quick
two or three articles here, just for the sake of contribution, I make a
typo here and there in the process, I repeat the question: is that
asking "to much" ???

There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours,
figures... since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore), the
patronizing idiot krooger, etc, who think that equipped with some pink
noise and an oscilloscope they can put out instructions as to what a
standart CD player, amp, lamp cord speaker cable, etc, should be. In the
process these fruitcakes call other people "delusional" etc, and act
god-like.

It's just satisfying, and nice, and funny, and OK and lets off some
steem to ridicule such folk.

On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 13:43:23 +0200, Fella wrote:

There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours,
figures... since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore)

There's some interesting logic lurking here. In what way do I deserve
to be lumped with Ferstler, McKelvy and Krueger? In what way does my
being 'some sort of a bore' (whatever that may mean) preclude my
writing an 'article' (whatever that may be)?

paul packer wrote:
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 13:43:23 +0200, Fella wrote:


There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours,
figures... since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore)


There's some interesting logic lurking here. In what way do I deserve
to be lumped with Ferstler, McKelvy and Krueger?

Like I said I haven't read any of the *articles* that you might have
posted on RAO up to now.

But went through some 10-15 of your articles just now, and found you to
be vain, smug, patronizing, argumentative, and mostly demogogic. your
vain, patronizing attitude and the way you throw fished-from-a-thesaurus
words around indicate that you are after some sort of a compensation for
your "exceptional mediocrity" (oxymoron? No, not inyour case.) ...

All this makes you a bit of a bore, a some sort of a bore, that is, you
*are* boring, yes, no doubt about that, but you make it hard for
sensible people to pin you down. But yes, you *can* be "lumped" with the
ferstler, krooger, etc, bunch, since you are, in the end, a bore, read:
boooooooriiing..

You don't have wood for ears though.

In what way does my
being 'some sort of a bore' (whatever that may mean)

Read above. And dully snap back with some snappy question for an answer,
thank you.


preclude my
writing an 'article' (whatever that may be)?

An article is what one posts on a newsgroup in the usenet. Now, if you
would like more clarification and definitions as to what might be a
"newsgroup", a "post", or the "usenet" etc, then I suggest you dully
snap back with a smug little question, clipping all else essential and
quoting some minor detail, as in: "usenet, do enlighten us fella, what
might be this usenet?"

"Fella" wrote in message
...
paul packer wrote:

On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:52:01 +0200, Fella wrote:


paul packer wrote:

On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:




And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this
mikey boy.


I think that's "tongue". Also "better than". .

Typos will be typos. Is that asking "to much"?

Besides, english is definitely not my mother tongue.


You mean your mother tounge, don't you?

No, I mean tongue. Listen, you be gettin on my nerves boi.. I be slappin
you silly if yous gunna keep this up.

Anyways .

Anyways????????????// Argh! Anyway.

.. I do not pretend to know .. or rather, I do not deem that
thousands of different equipment all over the world are "malfunctioning"
based on crude, borg-like, limited preconceptions and misconceptions.

How about base on numerous meansurements and listnening comparisons?

And this about equipment I've never even heard, or heard of (!) much less
measured.

If I would boast such god like qualities, well, perhaps then I shouldn't
be making typos either. Now, taking spare time work and writing a quick

It's not God like abilities, it's science.

two or three articles here, just for the sake of contribution, I make a
typo here and there in the process, I repeat the question: is that asking
"to much" ???

Way too much.

There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours, figures...
since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore), the patronizing idiot
krooger, etc, who think that equipped with some pink noise and an
oscilloscope they can put out instructions as to what a standart CD
player, amp, lamp cord speaker cable, etc, should be. In the

Thanks for demonstrating that facts mean nothing to you. Proof! Who needs
proof?

process these fruitcakes call other people "delusional" etc, and act
god-like.


It's not acting God like to understnad the thresholds of human hearing and
know that the measurements and listening comparisons mean what they mean.
Properly functioining CD players not designed to alter the Frequency
response from flat, sound the same as each other.

It's just satisfying, and nice, and funny, and OK and lets off some steem
to ridicule such folk.

If you get your kicks by making statements that don't reflect the reality of
the science of audio, it's you who set yourself up for ridicule.

I usually do not top post. But for an exceptional "get-a-brain-moran"
such as yourself, I'll make an exception: Your science is limited, your
understanding of the depths of the human ear perception is limited, your
measurements are limited, your so called listening tests are limited, a
flat frequency response does not even begin to tell the story when it
comes to *music* (NOT pink noise) .. etc.

And who am I telling all this to? A "get-a-brain-moran" .. Sheeeeeeesh,
I should get a brain..




Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message
...

paul packer wrote:


On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:52:01 +0200, Fella wrote:



paul packer wrote:


On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:





And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this
mikey boy.


I think that's "tongue". Also "better than". .

Typos will be typos. Is that asking "to much"?

Besides, english is definitely not my mother tongue.


You mean your mother tounge, don't you?

No, I mean tongue. Listen, you be gettin on my nerves boi.. I be slappin
you silly if yous gunna keep this up.

Anyways .


Anyways????????????// Argh! Anyway.

. I do not pretend to know .. or rather, I do not deem that

thousands of different equipment all over the world are "malfunctioning"
based on crude, borg-like, limited preconceptions and misconceptions.


How about base on numerous meansurements and listnening comparisons?


And this about equipment I've never even heard, or heard of (!) much less
measured.

If I would boast such god like qualities, well, perhaps then I shouldn't
be making typos either. Now, taking spare time work and writing a quick


It's not God like abilities, it's science.


two or three articles here, just for the sake of contribution, I make a
typo here and there in the process, I repeat the question: is that asking
"to much" ???


Way too much.


There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours, figures...
since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore), the patronizing idiot
krooger, etc, who think that equipped with some pink noise and an
oscilloscope they can put out instructions as to what a standart CD
player, amp, lamp cord speaker cable, etc, should be. In the


Thanks for demonstrating that facts mean nothing to you. Proof! Who needs
proof?


process these fruitcakes call other people "delusional" etc, and act
god-like.



It's not acting God like to understnad the thresholds of human hearing and
know that the measurements and listening comparisons mean what they mean.
Properly functioining CD players not designed to alter the Frequency
response from flat, sound the same as each other.


It's just satisfying, and nice, and funny, and OK and lets off some steem
to ridicule such folk.


If you get your kicks by making statements that don't reflect the reality of
the science of audio, it's you who set yourself up for ridicule.