paul packer wrote:
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 13:43:23 +0200, Fella wrote:


There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours,
figures... since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore)


There's some interesting logic lurking here. In what way do I deserve
to be lumped with Ferstler, McKelvy and Krueger?

Like I said I haven't read any of the *articles* that you might have
posted on RAO up to now.

But went through some 10-15 of your articles just now, and found you to
be vain, smug, patronizing, argumentative, and mostly demogogic. your
vain, patronizing attitude and the way you throw fished-from-a-thesaurus
words around indicate that you are after some sort of a compensation for
your "exceptional mediocrity" (oxymoron? No, not inyour case.) ...

All this makes you a bit of a bore, a some sort of a bore, that is, you
*are* boring, yes, no doubt about that, but you make it hard for
sensible people to pin you down. But yes, you *can* be "lumped" with the
ferstler, krooger, etc, bunch, since you are, in the end, a bore, read:
boooooooriiing..

You don't have wood for ears though.

In what way does my
being 'some sort of a bore' (whatever that may mean)

Read above. And dully snap back with some snappy question for an answer,
thank you.


preclude my
writing an 'article' (whatever that may be)?

An article is what one posts on a newsgroup in the usenet. Now, if you
would like more clarification and definitions as to what might be a
"newsgroup", a "post", or the "usenet" etc, then I suggest you dully
snap back with a smug little question, clipping all else essential and
quoting some minor detail, as in: "usenet, do enlighten us fella, what
might be this usenet?"