
October 27th 04, 05:56 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Stewart. Do you realise....
In article ,
Iain M Churches wrote:
I like to use Beyers and Shures on drum kits, (because I can't stand the
thought of a drummer thrashing a Neumann suspended above the top
cymbals:-) Otherwise I use condensers.
By the way. do you ever get to record live drums?. I have a feeling it
may be a dying art in studios. At the start of the digi era, we took to
recording a full kit guide track (to a click) and then one drum at a
time
:-((((((((( Deadly.
I do quite a lot of jazz, where the kit is alive and kicking:-)
Yes. Miking up every single part of a kit for one pass is often the law of
diminishing returns. You'll usually nead 'gates on the toms, and I'm not a
great lover of those. Often the traditional tree mic setup will sound just
fine with a decent drummer and kit. Otherwise, it's lots of time and work.
;-)
--
*Men are from Earth, women are from Earth. Deal with it.
Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
|

October 27th 04, 06:15 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Stewart. Do you realise....
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Iain M Churches wrote:
I like to use Beyers and Shures on drum kits, (because I can't stand the
thought of a drummer thrashing a Neumann suspended above the top
cymbals:-) Otherwise I use condensers.
By the way. do you ever get to record live drums?. I have a feeling it
may be a dying art in studios. At the start of the digi era, we took to
recording a full kit guide track (to a click) and then one drum at a
time
:-((((((((( Deadly.
I do quite a lot of jazz, where the kit is alive and kicking:-)
Yes. Miking up every single part of a kit for one pass is often the law of
diminishing returns. You'll usually nead 'gates on the toms, and I'm not a
great lover of those. Often the traditional tree mic setup will sound just
fine with a decent drummer and kit. Otherwise, it's lots of time and work.
;-)
Thanks Iain, yes I've got the time and work bit (or trial & error in my
case) I'll borrow some kit to gate the toms just to see how I get on. I've
also has a suggestion on mic'ing up the snare is to put the same type of mic
also below the snare antiphase (I've got a phasechange button on each mixer
channel) Any comments on this?
I'd like to try the tree method also... By the way did you take any M50's
home with you as I'd love to try the Decca tree ;-)
--
*Men are from Earth, women are from Earth. Deal with it.
Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
|

October 27th 04, 05:19 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Stewart. Do you realise....
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:53:29 +0300, "Iain M Churches"
wrote:
That a very large percentage of microphones
used in digital recordings are valve microphones.
Of course I do. Not the majority, but certainly a goodly proportion of
the more carefully made recordings.
Oh dear :-((
Neumann 49, 50, 56, 64 and U87 are very
popular.
Indeed they are, and for good reason.
Don't believe me? of course you don't:-)
Why would I not?
BTW, my own personal favourite 'do it all' mic is the STC 4038, but
that wouldn't last long in the kind of close-miking hell that you
Decca guys started with 'Phase Four'! :-)
Check the AES Journal (of which I am sure you are
a member, as the A stands for Audio and the E for
Engineering)
Also read some of the excellent recent
articles in Studio Sound,
to which I am sure you subscribe.
I don't subsribe, but I read it from time to time. It's much more a
pro-audio magazine than of interest to the replay end of audio.
--
Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
|