A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

One for the valvies 1/2....



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old November 5th 04, 01:42 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Nick Gorham
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 851
Default One for the valvies 1/2....

Keith G wrote:




OK, so you're really saying, all in all, the 4 ohm tap would be best then?
I'll give it a try and see if I can hear an improvement.

Thanks for that - nice to get information from someone who *knows*.... ;-)




Only other thing to consider (don't disagree with what Stew has posted)
but using the 4R tap with 8R speakers, will mean the output valves see a
reflected load thats 4 times bigger. Thi sis good in that it will tend
to reduce the distortion, but it will also severly limit to output
power, maybe more than the advantages of using the 4R tap give.

Thats why I originally mentioned reflected loads and load lines.

--
Nick
  #2 (permalink)  
Old November 5th 04, 10:07 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default One for the valvies 1/2....


"Nick Gorham" wrote in message
...
Keith G wrote:




OK, so you're really saying, all in all, the 4 ohm tap would be best
then? I'll give it a try and see if I can hear an improvement.

Thanks for that - nice to get information from someone who *knows*....
;-)




Only other thing to consider (don't disagree with what Stew has posted)



??


but using the 4R tap with 8R speakers, will mean the output valves see a
reflected load thats 4 times bigger. Thi sis good in that it will tend to
reduce the distortion, but it will also severly limit to output power,
maybe more than the advantages of using the 4R tap give.

Thats why I originally mentioned reflected loads and load lines.



OK, I'm taking it as 'tap down for less distortion but quieter' and 'tap up
for louder but more ragged' as a general rule of thumb then.




  #3 (permalink)  
Old November 6th 04, 07:13 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Stewart Pinkerton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,367
Default One for the valvies 1/2....

On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 23:07:52 -0000, "Keith G"
wrote:

OK, I'm taking it as 'tap down for less distortion but quieter' and 'tap up
for louder but more ragged' as a general rule of thumb then.


Succinct, and accurate! :-)
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.