A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Valve amp (preferably DIY) to drive apair of Wharfedale Diamond II's



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old November 19th 04, 12:41 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Don Pearce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 89
Default Valve amp (preferably DIY) to drive apair of Wharfedale Diamond II's

On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:06:47 +0000 (GMT), Jim Lesurf
wrote:

In article , Don Pearce
wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:04:38 +0000 (GMT), Jim Lesurf
wrote:



I am not quite sure how:

A) multiple field emitters, polotrons, and various other vacuum-state
devices.

B) high mobility / ballistic or quantum well/dot or multiple barried SS
devices.

fit into the above picture. My understanding is that they have been
developed during the last couple of decades, and in some cases required
new understanding of the relevant physics and/or novel fabrication
methods.

Don't know if any of them have been used in audio, though. :-)

I think that last sentence sums up the position of valves in the
mainstream. And are your B) devices products of valve research or solid
state research?


Vaguely speaking, A = valves, B = solid state.

Slainte,

Jim


It is just that there are certainly devices that use free electrons
(not bound into any kind of lattice) emitted from sharp points in what
looks on the tiny scale involved like a vacuum. I think that in such
cases it is very hard to decide what you are really looking at.

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
  #2 (permalink)  
Old November 19th 04, 03:18 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Jim Lesurf
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,051
Default Valve amp (preferably DIY) to drive apair of Wharfedale Diamond II's

In article , Don Pearce
wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:06:47 +0000 (GMT), Jim Lesurf
wrote:



Vaguely speaking, A = valves, B = solid state.

Slainte,

Jim


It is just that there are certainly devices that use free electrons (not
bound into any kind of lattice) emitted from sharp points in what looks
on the tiny scale involved like a vacuum. I think that in such cases it
is very hard to decide what you are really looking at.


Agreed. Once the devices become tiny you end up with 'ballistic' behaviour
and you might as well regard the semiconductor as a 'modified vacuum'. :-)

Thus at some point (pun) the point field emitters people have made for
'nano' (buzzword = grants) vacuum devices end up looking a lot like a
ballistic transistor with a small part of the semiconductor taken out. ;-

Slainte,

Jim

--
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html
Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html
Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.