If we can find the right individual(s), my wife would enjoy being ****ed
while I watch, take a few pics, and video: Yes, we will continue with
our plan of videotaping these romantic events and, as part of our
general guidelines for this collection, NO FACES in the pics or
video except ours. Camera shots will directed only from your waist
down.

Wife is hopeful to get with black guys, cock size,and sperm; the fact is,
she's a total sperm freak and for the record, I am too.

You must be willing to prove your SIZE in person, face-to-face before
anything happens. We're completely tired of the assholes on the audio
newsgroups.

Believe me, this is very much for real. Please DO NOT be picture or
video shy, NO faces except ours in any pictures or in video - only you
from the waist down. ;-)


Arny Krueger

Arny Krueger wrote:
snip, burn

Why do I not believe Arny wrote any of that, or the other two recent
postings with his name on 'em? Just a hunch.

"bigamps" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:
snip, burn

Why do I not believe Arny wrote any of that, or the other two recent
postings with his name on 'em? Just a hunch.

No hunch needed - the posts are forgeries.

How many differences can you find between these headers for a forgery:

Path:
internal1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.g iganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns14feed!worldnet.a tt.net!209.244.4.230!newsfeed1.dallas1.level3.net! newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!postn ews.google.com!not-for-mail
From: (Arny Krueger)
Newsgroups:
rec.audio.opinion,aus.hi-fi,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
Subject: More on Video
Date: 9 Nov 2004 16:45:24 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 20
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.170.202.62
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1100047524 5879 127.0.0.1 (10 Nov 2004 00:45:24
GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:45:24 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.audio.opinion:740533
aus.hi-fi:101591 rec.audio.tech:181709 rec.audio.tubes:290029
uk.rec.audio:110588

and the headers for the genuine article:

ath:
local1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news .comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 07:32:29 -0600
From: "Arny Krueger"
Newsgroups:
rec.audio.opinion,aus.hi-fi,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
References:
u


Subject: Love, Sex, and Videotapes
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 08:32:56 -0500
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Message-ID:
Lines: 18
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.42.250.144
X-Trace:
sv3-m6moWzh1PydEz0SyqUv/vbz9ddhSPKSQjX0Zy22bdH49qncnNKPoCtgPyeoBXi820Djc0D o8OiOHGgd!j1tS/KCIgwxba0eSDLlR/YhPBepCyEclTd66JT95J0N+/F8JLw+4PI3ZVtalyQ==
X-Complaints-To:
X-DMCA-Complaints-To:
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.20
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.audio.opinion:740436
aus.hi-fi:101573 rec.audio.misc:79754 rec.audio.tubes:289984
uk.rec.audio:110531

In article ,
Arny Krueger wrote:
Why do I not believe Arny wrote any of that, or the other two recent
postings with his name on 'em? Just a hunch.

No hunch needed - the posts are forgeries.

What's interesting is the intimate knowledge the forger has of the
subjects he writes on in Arny's name...

--
*Why doesn't Tarzan have a beard? *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Dave Plowman (News) said:

What's interesting is the intimate knowledge the forger has of the
subjects he writes on in Arny's name...

You think that's "interesting"? It's not even true.

I'll bet you think Krooger is a fine, upstanding citizen, too. ;-(

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message


In article ,
Arny Krueger wrote:

"bigamps" wrote in message



Why do I not believe Arny wrote any of that, or the other two recent
postings with his name on 'em? Just a hunch.

No hunch needed - the posts are forgeries.

What's interesting is the intimate knowledge the forger has of the
subjects he writes on in Arny's name...

That's arguable. A poster who claims considerable knowlege of the sex
business has criticized them pretty thoroughly.

bigamps said:

Why do I not believe Arny wrote any of that, or the other two recent
postings with his name on 'em? Just a hunch.

Mama amps didn't raise no fools! Just a hunch.