A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

DBT a flawed method for evaluating Hi-Fi ?



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2 (permalink)  
Old January 6th 05, 10:17 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Don Pearce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,412
Default DBT a flawed method for evaluating Hi-Fi ?

On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:04:55 -0000, "Richard Wall"
wrote:

Can anyone point to a Hi-Fi DBT test where no changes were actually made in
the source material to check that the audience could perceive no change ?


That would be EVERY DBT test. Each sample is randomly selected from
the two possibilities - that means that in each test the source has
either changed or not. So false positives and false negatives both
show up as failures, and this is as it should be.

I think the reason you have problems with DBTs is not that they fail,
but that they pretty much always succeed. They succeed in showing that
there is in fact no sonic difference between the components under
test. Again, these days that is as it should be - we have advanced far
enough along the HI Fi road that pretty much all components should
sound the same.

d

Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.