A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

DAB R3 balance



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15 (permalink)  
Old February 12th 05, 05:45 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
DAB sounds worse than FM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 135
Default DAB R3 balance

Don Pearce wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:25:59 GMT, "DAB sounds worse than FM"
wrote:

Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
DAB sounds worse than FM wrote:
I know there are some bad reception areas for FM. My point, which
you've conveniently omitted or forgotten, is that just because a
smallish percentage of the population do have poor FM reception is
not justification to provide low audio quality on DAB. Do you
disagree?

The stations I listen to on DAB sound fine to me.



Well, this is part of the problem, because we will always be
comparing apples and oranges, because you probably listen to R3, R4
and maybe R5, which are probably the least-affected radio stations
on DAB, but my issue is not about those stations; my issue is with
regards to the stereo music stations, which are being transmitted at
128kbps and sound horrendous.

Does *anybody* listen to that other crap? Low bit rate is the least of
their problems.



Yes, see:

http://www.rajar.co.uk/INDEX2.CFM?menuid=9

I think a more pertinent question would be: Does *anybody* listen to
Radio 3?


so I'd
rather give them a miss regardless. Even if I liked most of their
music, which I don't.



Quite; they're not meant for you, so we're arguing about different
things.


My main objection with DAB is that in the beginning we were promised
compression (dynamic) free broadcast, and the ability to select our
own degree of compression on the receiver. Well, Arcam certainly kept
their promise for that last part, but the broadcasters went ahead and
compressed anyway. *******s.



Yes, I agree with you there. But my main objection to DAB is that the
radio stations that I would listen to all use 128kbps and sound crap. R3
and R4 listeners are extremely lucky compared to everybody else.


--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info

Find the cheapest Freeview, DAB & MP3 Player Prices:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/fr..._receivers.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/da...tal_radios.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/mp...rs_1GB-5GB.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/mp...e_capacity.htm


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.