In article , Arny Krueger
wrote:
"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message
My only real experience with Ge devices has been with things like
AL102's in sets made back in the 1960's. These seemed to show
initially high rates of failures as you'd expect. Indeed, the term
'firecrackers' might be relevant here... :-)
I designed a phono preamp based on 2N404 ge switching transistors as a
junior engineering project. It outperformed the PAT 4 and remained
operational for a long time.
I also still have some (Armstrong) tuners and amps that use Ge devices and
which still work OK. The small signal devices generally seem fine if used
within their limits.
The problem with 'power' devices like the AL102 seems to have been
unreliable thermal/mechanical bonding. Hence in the same conditions of use
some devices would prove reliable, but others out of the same box would
fail quite soon due to variations in manufacture from one device to the
next.
This wasn't really a problem with Ge as such. Indeed, a few decades later I
encountered similar problems with InP Gunn diodes! The problem was that the
makers hadn't then learned how to bond/mount the devices reliably so as to
provide a good thermal path.
Slainte,
Jim
--
Electronics
http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Audio Misc
http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html
Armstrong Audio
http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html
Barbirolli Soc.
http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html