Why Stewart Pinkerton commits character assassination
Dear Mr Jute
I did not post my list of Pinkerton's lies in defense of you. You are
demonstrably big enough to look after yourself. I acted because
Pinkerton's public lack of rationality and decency is an insult to the
profession of "engineer".
Though I did save your private pages before you removed them, most of
what I know about you is from public sources. There is nothing in my
post that hasn't been in a newspaper or on television or on the radio
or in one of your own books. That is the the point of my letter, that
Pinkerton could with a minimum of effort have checked every one of his
accusations and discovered them to be a lie. I take your point, that
Pinkerton doesn't care that such grotesque accusations cannot be true
and should not be made in public without extraordinary prior efforts at
proof. But that is only another way of stating my reason of Pinkerton's
irrationality and indecency.
I understand your reluctance to entrust too many personal details to
the net to be trivialized by what you call "the sneering, jeering
slime", but you must allow me my own reasons for pointing out
Pinkerton's grotesque lies and distortions. If other engineers do not
join you in putting down a malevolent liar who calls himself an
"engineer", who will?
Your sincerely,
Frank B.
Andre Jute wrote:
rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
Why Stewart Pinkerton commits character assassination
Come on, Frank. I was just going to let the idiot Pinkerton twist on
the vine.
I mean, who in his right mind will believe the slimeball Pinkerton's
racist
accusation of -- wait for it -- child murder! The poor little man is
obviously
disturbed.
Anyhow, why give the little ****** all that information about me? If
he wants
to know, he can go buy one of my books, put money in my pocket, then
read the
blurbs. I don't explain myself to slime, and I am not grateful when
you do
it. It is for this reason that years ago I pulled my private netsite,
clearly
the original source of most of your concentrated information.
You are apparently a rational, hardworking guy. But you have failed
to understand
that the hatred Pinkerton bears me isn't rational. He wouldn't hate
me less
if I tried to be less obviously smarter than him. Jon Yaeger gave us
the text
the other day: "Right or wrong" Jute is wrong because those
irrational dickheads
Yeager and his buddy Pinkerton do not like me; facts are irrelevant.
It is
my existence that bothers them, my insistence on truth making them
look shabby
all the time. I'm the Jew in their fraudulent Hall of Heroes. Even if
I moved
out of Pinkerton's sun, he would still hate me for being born
principled. It
is a sort of curse we Calvinists bear bravely. (Well, at least
laughing all
the way to the bank.) You can't argue with terrorists and Pinkerton
is a silicon
terrorist on a tube conference. Everything you said is right and
brilliantly
argued, but Pinkerton will not grasp a word of it through his haze of
self-justified
hatred. Okay?
As for your first two wives bringing me into your marital bed, that's
a small
price to pay for the privilege of being married to a graphic
designer. At least
the bedspread will be pleasing and the bedside books interestingly
designed--and
by me! Hee-hee.
Let the silly little pudding-pull Pinkerton run. Certainly someone
who has
to tell everyone he bought not one but two Vorsprung Durch Technic
(in the
hope of seeming young, thrusting, modern, advanced?) is not worthy of
the attentions
of a man who married two graphic designers in succession and can even
spell
reprographics, never mind know what it is. Pinkerton is a nobody who
will wear
himself out soon enough, a lightweight who will blow away on his own
foul breath.
Andre Jute
wrote:
Hello.
I'm probably the longest Jute-watcher here, since Mr Jute's text on
automobile design was pressed into my hand as my bible on my first
day
at work right out of college. Normally I just lurk but Pinkerton's
grotesque character assassination of Mr Jute should not pass
unchallenged.
BACKGROUND:After a quick glance at the internet, Stewart Pinkerton
postured on RAT and UKRA as an expert on Quad electrostatics,
making
grotesquely mistaken statements. On the basis of these erroneous
conclusions, Pinkerton abused Phil Allison and Andre Jute as
cretins
and suchlike. When others forced Pinkerton to retract, far from
apologizing about the lies he told about them, Pinkerton further
abused
Messrs Allison and Jute.
PINKERTON LIE NO 311: Now, in desperation, Pinkerton tries
character
assassination. On the sole evidence that Mr Jute was born in South
Africa, Pinkerton makes the racist slur that Mr Jute is a child
murderer: "You however, are a sad and bitter old hack, crying into
his
Guinness about the good old days when you could have black kids
shot at
dawn."
Here are some facts that have been in the papers and on the BBC and
are
reprinted on Mr Jute's book jackets.
FACT: The apartheid government twice sent assassins after Mr Jute
for
his work for freedom for oppressed people. That is precisely the
opposite of what Stewart Pinkerton, on no evidence whatsoever,
tries to
make out.
PINKERTON LIE NO 312: On the basis that Mr Jute once worked in
intelligence, Pinkerton accuses him of having been a member of
BOSS,
the apartheid secret police.
FACT: Pinkerton didn't ask where Mr Jute was an intelligence
officer or
what sort of an intelligence officer before he starts spraying
lies; he
just makes grotesque assumptions. Mr Jute was not a member of BOSS,
ever. But the assassins who tried to kill Mr Jute were employed by
BOSS. The truth is precisely the opposite of the lie Pinkerton
tells.
PINKERTON LIE NO 313: It is widely known that between engineering
and
other professional texts in more esoteric subjects on which he has
knowledge, Mr Jute writes novels, some of them under the pseudonym
Andrew McCoy. This Pinkerton describes as "Also wrote some
potboilers
under the name Andrew McCoy" which according to Pinkerton are
"worthless".
FACT: The reason the apartheid government (for whom Pinkerton makes
the
racist claim that Mr Jute committed child murders) twice sent the
BOSS
assassins (of whom Pinkerton claims Mr Jute was a member) to kill
Mr
Jute was precisely for the books under the pseudonym Andrew McCoy
(according to Pinkerton "worthless potboilers"). Actually, it is
easy
to find out that these novels were highly reviewed in the best
media
around the world. The New York Times called Atrocity Week 'a
towering
landmark in the literature of violence'; the apartheid government
agreed and sent assassins after Mr Jute. The Insurrectionist, a
novel,
remember (according to Pinkerton a 'worthless potboiler'), was
reviewed
by the BBC on the main news by the Director of the Institute for
Strategic Studies as 'a blueprint for a black revolution'; the
apartheid government agreed and tried to kill Mr Jute for it; the
book
was widely translated (I first read it in Spanish) and in all those
languages used as a textbook by revolutionaries; it was a
prescribed
text in the antiterrorist training of soldiers and civil servants
at
British universities (my brother had it in his course given by
Brigadier Richard Clutterbuck).
CONCLUSION: Mr Jute, whatever you may think of his short way with
fools, is a libertarian and humanitarian intellectual who has
affected
the course of history on two continents. He is a renaissance man,
an
artist, an engineer, a soldier, a thinker, a revered teacher.
Pinkerton is a postman of junk mail; even there Mr Jute, a sort of
demi-god to graphic designers (both my first two wives were graphic
designers) and one of the world's leading experts in the esoteric
science of print reprographics, knows more about Pinkerton's
business
than Pinkerton ever will!
It is difficult not to conclude that Pinkerton's attempted
character
assassinations of Mr Jute are the result of Pinkerton's envy of a
superior human being.
Frank B
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:45:10 +0000 (UTC), Stewart Pinkerton
wrote:
On 14 Mar 2005 23:34:42 -0000, Andre Jute
wrote:
Quad ESLs - 57 or 63? Pinkerton's lies debunked
Try to tell the difference between lies and an honest mistake.
Oh, I
forgot, you're so far gone that you don't know the difference
between
lies and reality.
A short synopsis, for those who don't know this clown:
Born 1945 in Oudtshoorn, South Africa, Andre Jute McCoy was
educated
at the Universities of Stellenbosch (South Africa) and Adelaide.
He
has had a variety of occupations and interests, including
advertising
(he became a partner in an advertising company at the age of 23
and
retired at 26), intelligence officer, racing driver, big game
hunter,
actor, critic of theatre, music and art, magazine editor, public
relations officer and professional gambler.....
Also wrote some potboilers under the name Andrew McCoy, between
1978
and 1988. This sad old clown leaves Walter Mitty in the dust, and
you
can judge his basic character from his self-admitted time as an
'intelligence officer' - ever read about the lovely boys of BOSS?
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
On 14 Mar 2005 23:34:42 -0000, Andre Jute
wrote:
Quad ESLs - 57 or 63? Pinkerton's lies debunked
Try to tell the difference between lies and an honest mistake.
Oh, I
forgot, you're so far gone that you don't know the difference
between
lies and reality.
I'm not inclinded to be so tolerant, Mike.
No ****!
Pinko got this dumb misunderstanding from the Quad site where
they
say that
from 1957 to 1966 PJW developed electrostats. That's all it
says; it
can mean
anything or nothing but in fact is specifically intended to mean
nothing without
being challenged. Pinko was just tripped up by a copywriter who
probably the
day before wrote about soap and the day after about salad cream.
It wasn't some old Yarpie hack who normally writes potboiler
'thrillers', was it?
The blustering fool Pinkerton doesn't just tell a lie, he uses
the
lie to malign
an audio designer, Peter Walker, whose feet he isn't fit to
lick:
Just another typical lie from the sad Jute sack.
And it's revealing that Walker had already started work on
the
'63
three years before the '57 even went on sale in 1966.
In other words, the useless poseur Pinkerton claims Walker sold
the
57 while
knowing it wasn't good enough.
The '63 is an *entirely* different speaker, and if the tired old
hack
Jute knew anything about industry, he'd be well aware that you
use
sales from existing products to develop better ones. The '57 was
the
best that PJW could make in 1957, but he knew that more was
possible,
and he took a *long* time to get the '63 ready for production,
during
which time the '57 kept the cash flowing.
This is the speaker that was voted the greatest
audiophile invention of the 20th century! But Pinkerton---a
failed
salaryman,
an "engineer" who for a living essentially cleans up the
computers
of more
creative people!---thinks its creator was a fool and a crook.
What a
pluperfect
****** this Pinkerton is.
What a pathetic liar Jute is - but evertone on RAT already knows
this.
Pinko starts hurling insults every time we catch him out in
these
silly mistakes
and lies. He calls Phil Allison "a cretin" for correcting his
(Pinkerton's)
ignorance.
Allison *is* a foul-mouthed cretin - as are you.
On this occasion, I was wrong. Some of us accept being wrong, add
the
truth to our memory banks, and move on. You however, are a sad
and
bitter old hack, crying into his Guinness about the god old days
when
you could have black kids shot at dawn.
Pinkerton gets it grotesquely wrong and then screeches at me
"you're
too used to writing pot-boiler fiction".
You are, that's obvious with every one of your pathetic
self-pitying
posts.
I can't be bothered to straighten
out this poor moron Pinkerton who cannot even distinguish
engineering texts
and other professional handbooks from literary fiction. There
doesn't seem
to be anything of value in Pinkerton's life, just spiteful lies
about more
creative men. He's worthless.
As worthless as 'Andrew McCoy'? I think not.......................
|