![]() |
|
Best Sound Engineering Degree
"Someone Out In Space" wrote in message ... Hi, I'm a guy from Italy who decided that sound engineer can be his profession. Now I wonder to know which are the best Universities which offers a "sound engineering" or "audio engineering" degree. Here in Italy we don't have anything like that in University, only some courses to become a sort of "sound technician" who can work in recording studios, or as a live sound technician, but not really an engineer. I'm looking for the best I can find, no matter where it is, how long it takes :) If any of you can give me some advices, or just tell me his experiences, i don't know, anything that can help me, I will appreciate that. Thank you! Gianluca p.s. sorry for my non-perfect english in the middle of a BSc in : Sound, Light and Live event technology at Derby University here in the UK. course code hj39 its one of the few live sound and light degrees in this country. Rob |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
"Rob Beech" wrote in message ... "Someone Out In Space" wrote in message ... Hi, I'm a guy from Italy who decided that sound engineer can be his profession. Now I wonder to know which are the best Universities which offers a "sound engineering" or "audio engineering" degree. Here in Italy we don't have anything like that in University, only some courses to become a sort of "sound technician" who can work in recording studios, or as a live sound technician, but not really an engineer. I'm looking for the best I can find, no matter where it is, how long it takes :) If any of you can give me some advices, or just tell me his experiences, i don't know, anything that can help me, I will appreciate that. Thank you! Gianluca p.s. sorry for my non-perfect english Even a degree, or having completed a course at an American audio college will not guarantee you a job, and few studios can offer proper formal training these days, so maybe an application to a broadcasting company might be the best route. Iain |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
In article ,
Iain M Churches wrote: Even a degree, or having completed a course at an American audio college will not guarantee you a job, and few studios can offer proper formal training these days, so maybe an application to a broadcasting company might be the best route. I know I'm an old fart, but the lack of general knowledge about the techical basics of TV - including things other than sound - are surprising from those with various 'media' degrees. I was taught those on a 3 month residential course at the BBC training centre - let alone several years of college. -- *Real women don't have hot flashes, they have power surges. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
"Paul Dormer" wrote in message ... "Someone Out In Space" wrote in message . .. Hi, I'm a guy from Italy who decided that sound engineer can be his profession. Now I wonder to know which are the best Universities which offers a "sound engineering" or "audio engineering" degree. Here in Italy we don't have anything like that in University, only some courses to become a sort of "sound technician" who can work in recording studios, or as a live sound technician, but not really an engineer. I'm looking for the best I can find, no matter where it is, how long it takes :) If any of you can give me some advices, or just tell me his experiences, i don't know, anything that can help me, I will appreciate that. http://www.surrey.ac.uk/soundrec/php/tonmeister.php He would be much better off trying to find a university in Italy that offers the same course. Unless his English is good he will find life very hard there. There used to be a requirement to be a very capable musician as well but I don't know if that is still in place. Used to be grade 5 on one instrument and grade 8 on another, at least one of which had to be keyboard based. I think he hasn't thought this through properly anyway. Just deciding you want to be a sound engineer is not good enough. You do need to have some natural talent for the job. He's also obviously not clear on what the job actually involves by his engineer and technician comments. Getting a degree in sound will not make him an engineer by default and there are many more things to take into consideration. The more info he can give us the more we can help him. Phildo |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 22:22:02 -0400, "Phildo" wrote:
http://www.surrey.ac.uk/soundrec/php/tonmeister.php He would be much better off trying to find a university in Italy that offers the same course. There's not :( Only some courses to become a "sound technician", but I was looking for something higher, that let me a wider range of jobs involved in sound recording, acoustic, and stuff like that. Unless his English is good he will find life very hard there. What do you mean? For the language or something else? There used to be a requirement to be a very capable musician as well but I don't know if that is still in place. Used to be grade 5 on one instrument and grade 8 on another, at least one of which had to be keyboard based. Well this is the biggest problem for me I think. The site says: "The Tonmeister course is structured in such a way that it assumes that all first-year students have a reasonable level of musical performance ability, and good theoretical knowledge and understanding of Mathematics, Music and Physics. Our entrance requirements are therefore good A-level passes in those three subjects (typically AAB), and ideally a pass at Grade 7 or 8 (ABRSM, Trinity or Guildhall) in musical performance." First of all I don't know what is an A-level in something. School system here in Italy is really different. Well, in September I'll get a degree in Aerospace Engineering here in Italy, so I think I have the knowledge of Phisics and Maths, I just don't know how to demonstrate it for English system. Music. Well I can play guitar, bass and I'm learning piano, but by private lessons, so I don't have any attestation about my music knowledge. And where can I find what I'm supposed to know to have an A-level in Music? And where and how can I demonstarate my knowledges? This is the main problem for me now. I think he hasn't thought this through properly anyway. Just deciding you want to be a sound engineer is not good enough. You do need to have some natural talent for the job. He's also obviously not clear on what the job actually involves by his engineer and technician comments. Getting a degree in sound will not make him an engineer by default and there are many more things to take into consideration. The more info he can give us the more we can help him. Phildo Thank you all!!! Gianluca |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
"Someone Out In Space" wrote in message ... On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 22:22:02 -0400, "Phildo" wrote: http://www.surrey.ac.uk/soundrec/php/tonmeister.php He would be much better off trying to find a university in Italy that offers the same course. There's not :( Only some courses to become a "sound technician", but I was looking for something higher, that let me a wider range of jobs involved in sound recording, acoustic, and stuff like that. Your better bet is to work your way up. A degree can only teach you the theory and experience means far more. Unless his English is good he will find life very hard there. What do you mean? For the language or something else? The language. You will be faced with a barrage of technical terms. There used to be a requirement to be a very capable musician as well but I don't know if that is still in place. Used to be grade 5 on one instrument and grade 8 on another, at least one of which had to be keyboard based. Well this is the biggest problem for me I think. The site says: "The Tonmeister course is structured in such a way that it assumes that all first-year students have a reasonable level of musical performance ability, and good theoretical knowledge and understanding of Mathematics, Music and Physics. Our entrance requirements are therefore good A-level passes in those three subjects (typically AAB), and ideally a pass at Grade 7 or 8 (ABRSM, Trinity or Guildhall) in musical performance." First of all I don't know what is an A-level in something. School system here in Italy is really different. In the UK we finish school at 16 with what used to be called O levels but are now called GCSEs. We have the option to then go to a 6th form college to do A-levels which are more advanced. A levels today are about the equivalent difficulty of what O levels where when I was at school as they have REALLY dumbed down the exams to try to show the failing education system is actually improving. Although they say AAB at Surrey you are more likely looking at AAA or even a 4th A-level to get in. Well, in September I'll get a degree in Aerospace Engineering here in Italy, so I think I have the knowledge of Phisics and Maths, I just don't know how to demonstrate it for English system. Music. Well I can play guitar, bass and I'm learning piano, but by private lessons, so I don't have any attestation about my music knowledge. And where can I find what I'm supposed to know to have an A-level in Music? And where and how can I demonstarate my knowledges? This is the main problem for me now. Grade 8 is a VERY high level of performance in an instrument and they usually require a keyboard based instrument. It is a really tough course to be able to get on to and until recently was the most over-subscribed course in the UK with very few of the people applying actually getting in. Forget studying sound at anything but a basic level and get your skills on the job. Qualifications don't really mean anything in this business. Also, what sort of sound engineer do you want to be? Do you have any particular discipline in mind? Phildo |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
Phildo wrote:
"Someone Out In Space" wrote in message ... On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 22:22:02 -0400, "Phildo" wrote: http://www.surrey.ac.uk/soundrec/php/tonmeister.php He would be much better off trying to find a university in Italy that offers the same course. There's not :( Only some courses to become a "sound technician", but I was looking for something higher, that let me a wider range of jobs involved in sound recording, acoustic, and stuff like that. Your better bet is to work your way up. A degree can only teach you the theory and experience means far more. In that case, you're quite right. In my experience of degrees they include a vocational element, and the fact (your fact - I haven't checked) that the Tonmeister degrees offer no practical grounding or on-site placements renders them of limited use. Unless his English is good he will find life very hard there. What do you mean? For the language or something else? The language. You will be faced with a barrage of technical terms. Not a reason for not doing it. I know many students whose first language isn't English do very well with technical subjects. There used to be a requirement to be a very capable musician as well but I don't know if that is still in place. Used to be grade 5 on one instrument and grade 8 on another, at least one of which had to be keyboard based. Well this is the biggest problem for me I think. The site says: "The Tonmeister course is structured in such a way that it assumes that all first-year students have a reasonable level of musical performance ability, and good theoretical knowledge and understanding of Mathematics, Music and Physics. Our entrance requirements are therefore good A-level passes in those three subjects (typically AAB), and ideally a pass at Grade 7 or 8 (ABRSM, Trinity or Guildhall) in musical performance." First of all I don't know what is an A-level in something. School system here in Italy is really different. In the UK we finish school at 16 with what used to be called O levels but are now called GCSEs. We have the option to then go to a 6th form college to do A-levels which are more advanced. A levels today are about the equivalent difficulty of what O levels where when I was at school as they have REALLY dumbed down the exams to try to show the failing education system is actually improving. I'm not sure which subjects you are referring to, but your experience is very different to mine. When were you at school? My experience is based on doing them in the late 70s. Although they say AAB at Surrey you are more likely looking at AAA or even a 4th A-level to get in. Depends. Universities are well known for their curious entrance criteria. Well, in September I'll get a degree in Aerospace Engineering here in Italy, so I think I have the knowledge of Phisics and Maths, I just don't know how to demonstrate it for English system. Music. Well I can play guitar, bass and I'm learning piano, but by private lessons, so I don't have any attestation about my music knowledge. And where can I find what I'm supposed to know to have an A-level in Music? And where and how can I demonstarate my knowledges? This is the main problem for me now. Grade 8 is a VERY high level of performance in an instrument and they usually require a keyboard based instrument. It is a really tough course to be able to get on to and until recently was the most over-subscribed course in the UK with very few of the people applying actually getting in. Forget studying sound at anything but a basic level and get your skills on the job. Qualifications don't really mean anything in this business. For some people it's a chicken and egg situation. In my experience a qualification helps get a job. It *doesn't* get you a job. But if sound engineering doesn't involve an academic grounding, and there aren't any courses with a vocational element, then I defer. Also, what sort of sound engineer do you want to be? Do you have any particular discipline in mind? One of the advantages of education - helps you decide. Rob |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
"justin" wrote in message ... In Europe you are not an Engineer without formal four year university degree, regardles of the profession. Ahem, complete and utter ********. Of course one has to have some talent, geting through a total of 8 + 4 + 4 years in becoming a tonemeister will weed many non talented out, dont't you think? Being good at a subject and managing to get a degree in it is no measure of competence for the job. I have known engineers with no qualifications but lots of experience who could knock spots off Tonmeister graduates and tonmeister graduates who couldn't mix concrete. Phildo |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
"Rob" wrote in message ... Phildo wrote: Your better bet is to work your way up. A degree can only teach you the theory and experience means far more. In that case, you're quite right. In my experience of degrees they include a vocational element, and the fact (your fact - I haven't checked) that the Tonmeister degrees offer no practical grounding or on-site placements renders them of limited use. I never said any such thing. Please take your words out of my mouth as I find them most distasteful. Unless his English is good he will find life very hard there. What do you mean? For the language or something else? The language. You will be faced with a barrage of technical terms. Not a reason for not doing it. I know many students whose first language isn't English do very well with technical subjects. And I have known several who found it a real barrier. The course is difficult enough without having to translate passages you do not understand. A thorough grasp of the language the course is taught in at that level is essential. In the UK we finish school at 16 with what used to be called O levels but are now called GCSEs. We have the option to then go to a 6th form college to do A-levels which are more advanced. A levels today are about the equivalent difficulty of what O levels where when I was at school as they have REALLY dumbed down the exams to try to show the failing education system is actually improving. I'm not sure which subjects you are referring to, but your experience is very different to mine. When were you at school? My experience is based on doing them in the late 70s. Last year I checked the current A level papers against my old O-level papers from 1985 in maths, physics, music, French, chemistry, geography and English (language and lit). The O-levels were harder by far in every case. My father was a teacher and always moaned about how the exams were being dumbed down when he heard the government crowing about the new levels of excellence they had achieved so we decided to see for ourselves. Although they say AAB at Surrey you are more likely looking at AAA or even a 4th A-level to get in. Depends. Universities are well known for their curious entrance criteria. I was being specific to Surrey and the Tonmeister degree course. Forget studying sound at anything but a basic level and get your skills on the job. Qualifications don't really mean anything in this business. For some people it's a chicken and egg situation. In my experience a qualification helps get a job. It *doesn't* get you a job. But if sound engineering doesn't involve an academic grounding, and there aren't any courses with a vocational element, then I defer. We are discussing sound engineering here or hadn't you noticed? Also, what sort of sound engineer do you want to be? Do you have any particular discipline in mind? One of the advantages of education - helps you decide. Not really. You can do something at university then get out in the field and discover you hate it. Much better to get some real world experience and work out what you want to do before wasting your time. I reckon a one-year basic sound engineering course such as the City & Guilds 182 followed by a few years of working in the industry would serve him far better than a degree. Phildo |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
In article ,
Phildo wrote: Of course one has to have some talent, geting through a total of 8 + 4 + 4 years in becoming a tonemeister will weed many non talented out, dont't you think? Being good at a subject and managing to get a degree in it is no measure of competence for the job. I have known engineers with no qualifications but lots of experience who could knock spots off Tonmeister graduates and tonmeister graduates who couldn't mix concrete. Absolutely. Being a musician - ie being capable of playing a musical instrument to a high standard - just ain't necessary to balance music. And it's not something that anyone can learn. So a bit like being a musician in that respect - you need a particular talent. Of course to balance music you have to be able to identify the various parts of the mix. Reading music - at least to lead sheet level - is also useful. What is, of course, essential is an *appreciation* of music. But being an expert in any one field of music won't necessarily make that person a decent balance engineer. Producer, maybe. -- *Some days you're the dog, some days the hydrant. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Phildo wrote: Of course one has to have some talent, geting through a total of 8 + 4 + 4 years in becoming a tonemeister will weed many non talented out, dont't you think? Being good at a subject and managing to get a degree in it is no measure of competence for the job. I have known engineers with no qualifications but lots of experience who could knock spots off Tonmeister graduates and tonmeister graduates who couldn't mix concrete. Absolutely. Being a musician - ie being capable of playing a musical instrument to a high standard - just ain't necessary to balance music. And it's not something that anyone can learn. So a bit like being a musician in that respect - you need a particular talent. And yet, it is surprising how many balance engineers, can play an instrument to a high standard. At the companies where I have worked, one has always been expected to be able to mark up a full score, pre session, and edit from one, post session. I have yet to come across a classical engineer who cannot do this. As regards pop music. I have known many tape ops/assistant engineers who could play guitar, bs gtr, and drums as well as or better than many of the artists we were recording. Of course to balance music you have to be able to identify the various parts of the mix. Reading music - at least to lead sheet level - is also useful. Probably essential. Would you drive in a rally without a map? :-) Iain |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
In article ,
Iain M Churches wrote: Absolutely. Being a musician - ie being capable of playing a musical instrument to a high standard - just ain't necessary to balance music. And it's not something that anyone can learn. So a bit like being a musician in that respect - you need a particular talent. And yet, it is surprising how many balance engineers, can play an instrument to a high standard. At the companies where I have worked, one has always been expected to be able to mark up a full score, pre session, and edit from one, post session. I have yet to come across a classical engineer who cannot do this. I'm afraid my knowledge of such people is more limited being TV and therefore somewhat lighter music based. [Thinks] Of the half dozen or so mixers I know or knew who specialised in the classical side I'd say it was about 50/50 as regards playing an instrument well. Although one of the best plays piano, organ and sings to a pro standard. And is equally at home with lighter music. As regards pop music. I have known many tape ops/assistant engineers who could play guitar, bs gtr, and drums as well as or better than many of the artists we were recording. Yes - again the recording studio side tends to attract more people who might have wanted a career in front of the microphone if things had gone according to plan. Although my next assistant on a drama shoot is a Bay City Roller... Of course to balance music you have to be able to identify the various parts of the mix. Reading music - at least to lead sheet level - is also useful. Probably essential. Would you drive in a rally without a map? :-) One mixer famous for the excellent results he got on early Top of the Pops - where it really *was* live, complete with orchestra and arrangements such to copy the actual record, played the records a few times before the studio day, and more or less memorised them. -- *I believe five out of four people have trouble with fractions. * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
Yes - again the recording studio side tends to attract more people who might have wanted a career in front of the microphone if things had gone according to plan. Or people who are good musicians but who specifically would NOT want a career as a professional musician... - Logan |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
Phildo wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message ... Phildo wrote: Your better bet is to work your way up. A degree can only teach you the theory and experience means far more. In that case, you're quite right. In my experience of degrees they include a vocational element, and the fact (your fact - I haven't checked) that the Tonmeister degrees offer no practical grounding or on-site placements renders them of limited use. I never said any such thing. Please take your words out of my mouth as I find them most distasteful. You said "A degree can only teach you the theory". Were you including the Tonmeister degrees in that statement? Unless his English is good he will find life very hard there. What do you mean? For the language or something else? The language. You will be faced with a barrage of technical terms. Not a reason for not doing it. I know many students whose first language isn't English do very well with technical subjects. And I have known several who found it a real barrier. The course is difficult enough without having to translate passages you do not understand. A thorough grasp of the language the course is taught in at that level is essential. Er, yes. Although Cambridge recently awarded a first to an 'illiterate' student. In the UK we finish school at 16 with what used to be called O levels but are now called GCSEs. We have the option to then go to a 6th form college to do A-levels which are more advanced. A levels today are about the equivalent difficulty of what O levels where when I was at school as they have REALLY dumbed down the exams to try to show the failing education system is actually improving. I'm not sure which subjects you are referring to, but your experience is very different to mine. When were you at school? My experience is based on doing them in the late 70s. Last year I checked the current A level papers against my old O-level papers from 1985 in maths, physics, music, French, chemistry, geography and English (language and lit). The O-levels were harder by far in every case. My father was a teacher and always moaned about how the exams were being dumbed down when he heard the government crowing about the new levels of excellence they had achieved so we decided to see for ourselves. That's interesting. So the A level curriculum has slid beneath O level, which leaves AS level at (say) (old) CSE 4? Although they say AAB at Surrey you are more likely looking at AAA or even a 4th A-level to get in. Depends. Universities are well known for their curious entrance criteria. I was being specific to Surrey and the Tonmeister degree course. OK, I don't know about Surrey's admissions policy, and I defer to your knowledge. My experience is that allowance is made for life skills and so forth. If Surrey doesn't, then that's that. Forget studying sound at anything but a basic level and get your skills on the job. Qualifications don't really mean anything in this business. For some people it's a chicken and egg situation. In my experience a qualification helps get a job. It *doesn't* get you a job. But if sound engineering doesn't involve an academic grounding, and there aren't any courses with a vocational element, then I defer. We are discussing sound engineering here or hadn't you noticed? Yes, hence the reference. Also, what sort of sound engineer do you want to be? Do you have any particular discipline in mind? One of the advantages of education - helps you decide. Not really. You can do something at university then get out in the field and discover you hate it. Much better to get some real world experience and work out what you want to do before wasting your time. I think we're going to have to agree to differ. Education is a part of the 'real world', at least in my opinion. I reckon a one-year basic sound engineering course such as the City & Guilds 182 followed by a few years of working in the industry would serve him far better than a degree. And on that, although I know nothing about sound engineering but based on my knowledge of vocational qualifications, I would be inclined to agree. Much as I hate the C&G approach to assessment. Rob |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
"The deffinition of a "technician" and "engineer" in Europe is based on
the level of education, technicians have secondary level while engineers are university graduates" .... that certainly isn't something that I've found in the UK part of Europe, although that isn't surprising, as the UK Europeyness has always being a bit of a question mark! |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
In article . com,
Tim Scott wrote: "The deffinition of a "technician" and "engineer" in Europe is based on the level of education, technicians have secondary level while engineers are university graduates" ... that certainly isn't something that I've found in the UK part of Europe, although that isn't surprising, as the UK Europeyness has always being a bit of a question mark! I personally get ****ed of with those who try and get sniffy about definitions. Most of the talent and production types tend to talk about sound engineers regardless of the job they do. To me, an engineer designs or fixes things. I'm an operator. I operate all sorts of sound equipment. And proud to be called just that. I fix the broken bits of my kit at home - later. Wearing a different hat ;-) -- *Husband and cat lost -- reward for cat Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
A Degree in Sound Engineering??
I find that the best engineers have one thing in common. They play an instrument!! kevin |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:45:25 GMT, justin wrote:
That may be true, but typically a 4 year, post secondary school experience in a recording studio won't come even close to a 4 year university drill. I'm talking university degree, not some SAE, Full sail or whatever one year course student mill, offering "tonemeister" certificate. OP wanted information on audio ENGINEERING degree and you arrogantly knocked him by implying he doesn't know the difference between audio technician and a tonemeister. Yes :) I just wanted to know which is the best sound Engineering degree, because I think I have the skills to become an audio engineer, not a simple technician. I want to learn to do, why to do, how to do, and I want to have a wider range oj jobs involved in audio/sound/acoustic I can do, 'cos I know there are few job places (at least here in Italy, but I can consider to work everywhere, at least at the beginning). That may mean the same thing where you're coming from but he can't GET an Audio Engineering/Tonemeister job in Italian broadcasting or production facility without university degree in music or applied technology. Neither would you unless you had some major international production credits. Just to put the things in a perspective, in Italy and elsewhere continental EU the difference is equivalent to the difference between a nurse and a physician, a draft person and an architect or a sales assistant and a marketing director. So is the knowledge, skill, responsibility and competence level. Salary too, about 30-50%. And since you are posting from the University of Berlin, give Deutche Rundfunk a call and ask them for the job requirements. They invented the term Tonemeister some 60 years ago. j. So the Tonmeister is the best degree. I understood this. Now I know that there's in University of Surrey, of Berlin and Wien, searching on the net. Do you know some other places? Thank you ALL very much!!! Gianluca |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:07:22 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote: In article . com, Tim Scott wrote: "The deffinition of a "technician" and "engineer" in Europe is based on the level of education, technicians have secondary level while engineers are university graduates" ... that certainly isn't something that I've found in the UK part of Europe, although that isn't surprising, as the UK Europeyness has always being a bit of a question mark! I personally get ****ed of with those who try and get sniffy about definitions. Most of the talent and production types tend to talk about sound engineers regardless of the job they do. To me, an engineer designs or fixes things. I'm an operator. I operate all sorts of sound equipment. And proud to be called just that. I fix the broken bits of my kit at home - later. Wearing a different hat ;-) Yes, that's why I would like an engineering degree, not a simple technician course or to learn the job doing it with professionists. Thanks!!! Gianluca |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
In article ,
Someone Out In Space wrote: Yes :) I just wanted to know which is the best sound Engineering degree, because I think I have the skills to become an audio engineer, not a simple technician. I want to learn to do, why to do, how to do, and I want to have a wider range oj jobs involved in audio/sound/acoustic I can do, 'cos I know there are few job places (at least here in Italy, but I can consider to work everywhere, at least at the beginning). I'm still unclear exactly what you mean. Do you wish to design, build and or repair audio equipment, or 'merely' use it? If you intend being what is commonly known as a sound engineer in the UK, here's a list. TV, radio, films, post production, recording studios (including location recording for sale as CD) theatre and live music events. There are some who work in more than one field, but most specialise. And within all of those fields, there is even more specialisation. For example in TV, different people might specialise in studio, outside broadcast (mainly sports) and location recording (mainly drama) Documentaries are also a specialised field. -- *Husband and cat lost -- reward for cat Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
"Logan Shaw" wrote in message ... Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Yes - again the recording studio side tends to attract more people who might have wanted a career in front of the microphone if things had gone according to plan. Or people who are good musicians but who specifically would NOT want a career as a professional musician... :-))) I could have probably done either, but I chose the control room as opposed to the studio. I like to eat regularly:-) Iain |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... One mixer famous for the excellent results he got on early Top of the Pops - where it really *was* live, complete with orchestra and arrangements such to copy the actual record, played the records a few times before the studio day, and more or less memorised them. That's a good method. Most classical engineers familiarise themselves in some depth with the work which they about to record, by listening to other well regarded versions. However, differences in interpretation and tempo can sometimes be alarming. As a producer I often work with said, when listening to a Naxos recording "Is that Beethoven III? It sounds vaguely familiar. .. a note here, a phrase there..," :-) Iain |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
"justin" wrote in message ... In article , Phildo wrote: "justin" wrote in message ... In Europe you are not an Engineer without formal four year university degree, regardles of the profession. Ahem, complete and utter ********. Nice argument. You spoke complete and utter ******** and I call them as I see them. I know loads of sound engineers without degrees and none of them have any problems with using the term. Being good at a subject and managing to get a degree in it is no measure of competence for the job. I have known engineers with no qualifications but lots of experience who could knock spots off Tonmeister graduates and tonmeister graduates who couldn't mix concrete. That may be true, but typically a 4 year, post secondary school experience in a recording studio won't come even close to a 4 year university drill. I'm talking university degree, not some SAE, Full sail or whatever one year course student mill, offering "tonemeister" certificate. I never said that. Easier way would be to do a basic course like the C&G182 first then get job experience. That would be how it works for most sound engineering jobs. If you want to do studio design or acoustic consultancy then go for the tonmeister. OP wanted information on audio ENGINEERING degree and you arrogantly knocked him by implying he doesn't know the difference between audio technician and a tonemeister. Not at all. He said he wants to be a sound engineer. These come in many different forms (and not all of them require a degree). He needs to be more specific about what he wants to do. Just saying he wants to be a "sound engineer" doesn't cut it. That may mean the same thing where you're coming from but he can't GET an Audio Engineering/Tonemeister job in Italian broadcasting or production facility without university degree in music or applied technology. Neither would you unless you had some major international production credits. So? He never said he wanted to do that. All he said was he wanted to be a sound engineer. Stop hallucinating and reading things that aren't there. Just to put the things in a perspective, in Italy and elsewhere continental EU the difference is equivalent to the difference between a nurse and a physician, a draft person and an architect or a sales assistant and a marketing director. So is the knowledge, skill, responsibility and competence level. Salary too, about 30-50%. When you apply it to classical recording or similar maybe but they're just a bunch of elitist snobs. And since you are posting from the University of Berlin, give Deutche Rundfunk a call and ask them for the job requirements. They invented the term Tonemeister some 60 years ago. What a pillock. The DFS news server is open to everyone and most people now use it as their news server. I have nothing to do with Berlin uni. I'm posting from a cruise ship in the middle of the Caribbean. Phildo |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... To me, an engineer designs or fixes things. I'm an operator. I operate all sorts of sound equipment. And proud to be called just that. I fix the broken bits of my kit at home - later. Wearing a different hat ;-) You're the old school, Dave:-) Not image conscious:-) Two of the most skilled mixers I have ever had the pleasure to with had the lowly job title of Gram Operator at the BBC. Iain |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
In article ,
Iain M Churches wrote: Yes - again the recording studio side tends to attract more people who might have wanted a career in front of the microphone if things had gone according to plan. Or people who are good musicians but who specifically would NOT want a career as a professional musician... :-))) I could have probably done either, but I chose the control room as opposed to the studio. I like to eat regularly:-) At one time that was true, but my side of the game is now mainly freelance too, so lots of time to decorate the spare room. ;-) -- *Out of my mind. Back in five minutes. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
In article ,
Iain M Churches wrote: To me, an engineer designs or fixes things. I'm an operator. I operate all sorts of sound equipment. And proud to be called just that. I fix the broken bits of my kit at home - later. Wearing a different hat ;-) You're the old school, Dave:-) Not image conscious:-) I don't have to prove anything to myself. I'll happily take a day's work rigging a studio then clipping mics on the talent and sit quietly standing by while someone else mixes. And still love a day on a Fisher boom - although I'd be the first to admit I'm not as good as I once was, through lack of practice. And grams work has come suddenly rather back in fashion. If it's the sort of show where music and FX can be put on there and then, I'm rather cheaper than dubbing suite time. ;-) Two of the most skilled mixers I have ever had the pleasure to with had the lowly job title of Gram Operator at the BBC. In the good ol' days any current TV mixer would have started out tracking booms and rigging, then 'move on' to boom operating, then grams, then mixing. You learnt your craft slowly. IMHO, nothing like going through all the jobs that as a sound supervisor you're going to 'supervise' while mixing. It's something I really don't like about at least some 'film school' graduates. They expect to be Lighting Directors etc without starting as - and learning how to do it well - a camera assistant. Same with sound. They say "I'm a sound recordist" - but ain't got a clue about boom operating. And I hate with a passion the use of personal mics unless they're the only option. Which they very rarely are. Rant over. My new TV has just arrived and needs setting up. A back projection Sagem using DLP technology. Lets see if it's as good as it looked in the shop. If not, it's going back and I'll get a CRT one as I intended. ;-) -- *Men are from Earth, women are from Earth. Deal with it. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
On 23/03/05 20:23, in article , "Dave Plowman
(News)" wrote: (...) Two of the most skilled mixers I have ever had the pleasure to with had the lowly job title of Gram Operator at the BBC. In the good ol' days any current TV mixer would have started out tracking booms and rigging, then 'move on' to boom operating, then grams, then mixing. You learnt your craft slowly. I'm ashamed to admit that I'm unfamiliar with the term "gram" or "gram operator... Anyone care to explain? Personally I found boom operating to be very hard... With boom poles that is, never come across a Fisher boom. I always thought they'd gone out of fashion, at least for feature film shooting. Joe -- Joe Kotroczo |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
In article ,
Joe Kotroczo wrote: In the good ol' days any current TV mixer would have started out tracking booms and rigging, then 'move on' to boom operating, then grams, then mixing. You learnt your craft slowly. I'm ashamed to admit that I'm unfamiliar with the term "gram" or "gram operator... Anyone care to explain? The person who plays in music, sound FX etc, into a TV show which is either live, or recorded as live - ie little or no audio post production. Grams - because originally these would have come from mainly gramophone records. Later reel to reel tape or NAB carts. Now anything from Minidisc to Instant Replay, 360, etc. Personally I found boom operating to be very hard... With boom poles that is, never come across a Fisher boom. I always thought they'd gone out of fashion, at least for feature film shooting. Fisher type booms are still used in studios for things like sit-coms and multi-camera shot soaps, etc. They have more reach than any pole - and are far less tiring to use. But are difficult to transport to a location as they are rather delicate things. But they require special skills - a Fisher boom operator can change to a pole happily - assuming he has the physical attributes - but not so easily the other way round. Although, of course, there are many skilled in both fields. Basically, for single camera shoots, a pole will usually suffice. For multi-camera - ie 'live' type things - a Fisher is near essential. It can rack in and out - say from about 10-20 ft - as fast as it can swing. You can't do that with a pole. -- *See no evil, Hear no evil, Date no evil. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
Joe Kotroczo wrote:
On 23/03/05 20:23, in article , "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In the good ol' days any current TV mixer would have started out tracking booms and rigging, then 'move on' to boom operating, then grams, then mixing. You learnt your craft slowly. I'm ashamed to admit that I'm unfamiliar with the term "gram" or "gram operator... Anyone care to explain? Hi, Joe Would you believe... gramaphone? My dad was an old-style TV chief engineer and it was always a hoot when he got flustered with my infernally loud "gram deck"... Gav PS wow on the Quicksilver heads-up. |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
"Joe Kotroczo" wrote in message ... Phil, the issue is linguistical. While I have absolutely no problem calling myself a "sound engineer" in English, I would never dare to call myself a "Toningenieur" in German. In German, for example, "Ingenieur" is a title that is comparable in status and usage with "Doktor". Well now we're all part of the same union, the sooner the rest of you Euros fall in line with the proper (ie British) way of doing things the better ;-) Phildo |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 01:14:44 -0400, "Phildo" wrote:
"Joe Kotroczo" wrote in message ... Phil, the issue is linguistical. While I have absolutely no problem calling myself a "sound engineer" in English, I would never dare to call myself a "Toningenieur" in German. In German, for example, "Ingenieur" is a title that is comparable in status and usage with "Doktor". Well now we're all part of the same union, the sooner the rest of you Euros fall in line with the proper (ie British) way of doing things the better ;-) Actually, the European (and US) way *is* the proper way, it's the Brits who sneer at engineers. Interesting, given how much of Britain's previous Greatness relied on British engineering skills and inventions. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message ... On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 01:14:44 -0400, "Phildo" wrote: "Joe Kotroczo" wrote in message ... Phil, the issue is linguistical. While I have absolutely no problem calling myself a "sound engineer" in English, I would never dare to call myself a "Toningenieur" in German. In German, for example, "Ingenieur" is a title that is comparable in status and usage with "Doktor". Well now we're all part of the same union, the sooner the rest of you Euros fall in line with the proper (ie British) way of doing things the better ;-) Actually, the European (and US) way *is* the proper way, Says who? it's the Brits who sneer at engineers. Interesting, given how much of Britain's previous Greatness relied on British engineering skills and inventions. Yeah, we produced the greatest engineers the world has ever known so we should decide how the term is used. Phildo |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:46:33 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote: In article , Someone Out In Space wrote: Yes :) I just wanted to know which is the best sound Engineering degree, because I think I have the skills to become an audio engineer, not a simple technician. I want to learn to do, why to do, how to do, and I want to have a wider range oj jobs involved in audio/sound/acoustic I can do, 'cos I know there are few job places (at least here in Italy, but I can consider to work everywhere, at least at the beginning). I'm still unclear exactly what you mean. Do you wish to design, build and or repair audio equipment, or 'merely' use it? Both, I want a degree that can teach me the most possible. I want to work for the music, but I'm better in phisics/maths than in music, so I thought that sound engineer (or Audio engineer) could be the right compromise. As a recording engineer, as the one who study the acoustic in a theater, in a concert hall, or I don't know... mixing music, it's not so clear to me too what I want to do, but what I know is that I want to use my rational skills for the music. Maybe I'm a dreamer, or just ingenuos, but I'm 22 and I can still decide what to do with my life, so... I want to try, and I need all the informations I can have from you all :) If you intend being what is commonly known as a sound engineer in the UK, here's a list. TV, radio, films, post production, recording studios (including location recording for sale as CD) theatre and live music events. There are some who work in more than one field, but most specialise. And within all of those fields, there is even more specialisation. For example in TV, different people might specialise in studio, outside broadcast (mainly sports) and location recording (mainly drama) Documentaries are also a specialised field. Thank you all once again! Gianluca |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:31:56 +0100, Joe Kotroczo
wrote: On 23/03/05 18:57, in article , "Phildo" wrote: In Europe you are not an Engineer without formal four year university degree, regardles of the profession. Ahem, complete and utter ********. Nice argument. You spoke complete and utter ******** and I call them as I see them. I know loads of sound engineers without degrees and none of them have any problems with using the term. Phil, the issue is linguistical. While I have absolutely no problem calling myself a "sound engineer" in English, I would never dare to call myself a "Toningenieur" in German. In German, for example, "Ingenieur" is a title that is comparable in status and usage with "Doktor". Joe In italy too, engineer is comparable to "Doctor" :) |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
In article ,
Someone Out In Space wrote: I'm still unclear exactly what you mean. Do you wish to design, build and or repair audio equipment, or 'merely' use it? Both, I want a degree that can teach me the most possible. I'd be very surprised if a course anywhere covered both to degree level. -- *Forget the Joneses, I keep us up with the Simpsons. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
"justin" wrote in message ... In article , Phildo wrote: Easier way would be to do a basic course like the C&G182 first then get job experience. That would be how it works for most sound engineering jobs. If you want to do studio design or acoustic consultancy then go for the tonmeister. Mate, dude, you have absolutely no clue what these terms represent. Get some education, get back and we'll talk. And stop offering advices - clearly you're the one who could use them the most. I know full well what these terms represent as far as my industry goes. Read what the OP has posted. He wants to be a "sound engineer". That can mean a myriad of things. He needs to be more specific as to what he wants to do. I post from alt.audio.pro.live-sound specific to the live industry where a degree means ****-all and an engineer is anyone who uses the board among others. Get off your high horse and lose the snobbish attitude you sanctimonious **** and realise that your world is not the only one out there. As for offering advice, I've been doing it on here for many years (from day one of this newsgroup) and will continue to do to those that need education like yourself. Phildo |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:57:34 -0400, "Phildo" wrote:
OP wanted information on audio ENGINEERING degree and you arrogantly knocked him by implying he doesn't know the difference between audio technician and a tonemeister. Not at all. He said he wants to be a sound engineer. These come in many different forms (and not all of them require a degree). He needs to be more specific about what he wants to do. Just saying he wants to be a "sound engineer" doesn't cut it. As I wrote on another reply, " I want to work for the music, but I'm better in phisics/maths than in music, so I thought that sound engineer (or Audio engineer) could be the right compromise. As a recording engineer, as the one who study the acoustic in a theater, in a concert hall, or I don't know... mixing music, it's not so clear to me too what I want to do, but what I know is that I want to use my rational skills for the music. Maybe I'm a dreamer, or just ingenuos, but I'm 22 and I can still decide what to do with my life, so... I want to try, and I need all the informations I can have from you all :)" Any suggestion will be appreciated :) Thank you!!! Gianluca |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
"Someone Out In Space" wrote in message ... On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:46:33 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article , Someone Out In Space wrote: Yes :) I just wanted to know which is the best sound Engineering degree, because I think I have the skills to become an audio engineer, not a simple technician. I want to learn to do, why to do, how to do, and I want to have a wider range oj jobs involved in audio/sound/acoustic I can do, 'cos I know there are few job places (at least here in Italy, but I can consider to work everywhere, at least at the beginning). I'm still unclear exactly what you mean. Do you wish to design, build and or repair audio equipment, or 'merely' use it? Both, I want a degree that can teach me the most possible. I want to work for the music, but I'm better in phisics/maths than in music, so I thought that sound engineer (or Audio engineer) could be the right compromise. As a recording engineer, as the one who study the acoustic in a theater, in a concert hall, or I don't know... mixing music, it's not so clear to me too what I want to do, but what I know is that I want to use my rational skills for the music. Maybe I'm a dreamer, or just ingenuos, but I'm 22 and I can still decide what to do with my life, so... I want to try, and I need all the informations I can have from you all :) If you want to become a live engineer mixing music for concerts then forget about the degree and work your way up in the real world. It will be useful as a recording engineer but there are specific courses for this. You need to be more specific in what you want to do before you choose a course to go on. Phildo |
Best Sound Engineering Degree
As I wrote on another reply,
" I want to work for the music, but I'm better in phisics/maths than in music, so I thought that sound engineer (or Audio engineer) could be the right compromise. As a recording engineer, as the one who study the acoustic in a theater, in a concert hall, or I don't know... mixing music, it's not so clear to me too what I want to do, but what I know is that I want to use my rational skills for the music. Maybe I'm a dreamer, or just ingenuos, but I'm 22 and I can still decide what to do with my life, so... I want to try, and I need all the informations I can have from you all :)" Any suggestion will be appreciated :) If your goal was to study in the US, I would suggest that you attenda four school and obtain BSEE. Your skills in physics and math make you perfectly suited for the coursework. There are a few engineering schools that offer specializations in acoustics, and others in music or stage craft. Purdue University is well regarded for its engineering and its theater sound programs. Penn State well known for their graduate acoustics programs. The University of Miami has a music/engineering program. If you obtain an engineering degree, you will be employable in a number of fields, not limited to music or sound reinforcement. Mixing sound is but one small facet of pretty broad industry. There are a number of career opportunities that are pretty far from knob jockey, but still enable you to be connected to an interesting career. Don't waste your time going to "knob school". Get the real sheepskin. It will increase your value to many (not all) prospective employers. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:49 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk