![]() |
|
Info please
Hi Guys
Can I pick some expert brains please? I am looking for a non portable HDD based MP3 player with a cd drive included. The idea is that I can load all of my cds onto the system, stick them in the loft and just use the files stored on the HDD going forward. I heard a rumour that Sony used to produce such a thing but it is no longer available. Thanks in advance Adrian |
Info please
wrote in message oups.com... Hi Guys Can I pick some expert brains please? I am looking for a non portable HDD based MP3 player with a cd drive included. The idea is that I can load all of my cds onto the system, stick them in the loft and just use the files stored on the HDD going forward. I heard a rumour that Sony used to produce such a thing but it is no longer available. Thanks in advance Adrian http://www.cyberselect.co.uk/changer...logue=speakers Bloody expensive though, build a PC with a rack mounted component that accesses the shared directory. Much cheaper, and can expand as much as you like (HD) also can use your own encodes types (just install codec) ie OGG, FLAC etc.I wouldn't put a PC in the loft either, what about under the stairs? |
Info please
Nath wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... Hi Guys Can I pick some expert brains please? I am looking for a non portable HDD based MP3 player with a cd drive included. The idea is that I can load all of my cds onto the system, stick them in the loft and just use the files stored on the HDD going forward. I heard a rumour that Sony used to produce such a thing but it is no longer available. Thanks in advance Adrian http://www.cyberselect.co.uk/changer...logue=speakers Bloody expensive though, build a PC with a rack mounted component that accesses the shared directory. Much cheaper, and can expand as much as you like (HD) also can use your own encodes types (just install codec) ie OGG, FLAC etc.I wouldn't put a PC in the loft either, what about under the stairs? You're right - that's a fair old price. I'm thinking off getting one of these when they're out: http://www.cambridgeaudio.com/press_...io+Az ur+640H I'm using a Yamaha 160Gb HD/CDR component which is good - but no mp3. For the PC route I'd consider a laptop (275UKP ebay; 375UKP new) and external USB soundcard (50UKP*) plus an external HDD (new 80UKP) if you want more local space, and/or a wireless router/PC card (75UKP) for an ADSL connected PC elsewhere. Advantage over build-yer-own is the screen, low noise and portability. Rob * not sure which is best - my Creative NX is good but only works properly when the laptop's running off batteries. |
Info please
|
Info please
"Rob" wrote You're right - that's a fair old price. I'm thinking off getting one of these when they're out: http://www.cambridgeaudio.com/press_...io+Az ur+640H I'm using a Yamaha 160Gb HD/CDR component which is good - but no mp3. For the PC route I'd consider a laptop (275UKP ebay; 375UKP new) and external USB soundcard (50UKP*) plus an external HDD (new 80UKP) if you want more local space, and/or a wireless router/PC card (75UKP) for an ADSL connected PC elsewhere. Advantage over build-yer-own is the screen, low noise and portability. Agree entirely, even with a 'normal' PC I'm using an external soundcard and external 200 Gb HDDs nowadays..... |
Info please
"Keith G" wrote in message .. . "Rob" wrote You're right - that's a fair old price. I'm thinking off getting one of these when they're out: http://www.cambridgeaudio.com/press_...io+Az ur+640H I'm using a Yamaha 160Gb HD/CDR component which is good - but no mp3. For the PC route I'd consider a laptop (275UKP ebay; 375UKP new) and external USB soundcard (50UKP*) plus an external HDD (new 80UKP) if you want more local space, and/or a wireless router/PC card (75UKP) for an ADSL connected PC elsewhere. Advantage over build-yer-own is the screen, low noise and portability. Agree entirely, even with a 'normal' PC I'm using an external soundcard and external 200 Gb HDDs nowadays..... For around £1300 I can fit a PC with about 10 250GB HD's. :-D Add another couple of hundred quid for a streamer box thingy in each location. And that's it. Cheaper than a single Sound Server, and considerably more storage and upgradability. |
Info please
"Nath" wrote Agree entirely, even with a 'normal' PC I'm using an external soundcard and external 200 Gb HDDs nowadays..... For around £1300 I can fit a PC with about 10 250GB HD's. :-D Add another couple of hundred quid for a streamer box thingy in each location. And that's it. Cheaper than a single Sound Server, and considerably more storage and upgradability. You've got too many bloody oggs then.....!! |
Info please
"Keith G" wrote in message .. . "Nath" wrote Agree entirely, even with a 'normal' PC I'm using an external soundcard and external 200 Gb HDDs nowadays..... For around £1300 I can fit a PC with about 10 250GB HD's. :-D Add another couple of hundred quid for a streamer box thingy in each location. And that's it. Cheaper than a single Sound Server, and considerably more storage and upgradability. You've got too many bloody oggs then.....!! My entire audio colletion encoded to OGG, with same MP3 is just under 40GB, so EVERYTHING fits onto my iriver..in fact I have around 4.6GB free since I delete duplicates or "alternative" versions...I mean do you really need 8 versions of the same song?? Also got compilations, best of's, Rock/Chart show compilations some tracks duplicated. Also some sequential albums have one track from another album (REM for instance) I was just saying for the same price of the Sound Server I could outfit a whopper PC server, and store everything as lossless, or even if lossy highbitrate with thousands of albums (if you have that many) Did you read the last message on the OGG v MP3 thread? (get latest Lame and OGG encoder) |
Info please
"Nath" wrote in message .. . "Keith G" wrote in message .. . "Nath" wrote Agree entirely, even with a 'normal' PC I'm using an external soundcard and external 200 Gb HDDs nowadays..... For around £1300 I can fit a PC with about 10 250GB HD's. :-D Add another couple of hundred quid for a streamer box thingy in each location. And that's it. Cheaper than a single Sound Server, and considerably more storage and upgradability. You've got too many bloody oggs then.....!! My entire audio colletion encoded to OGG, with same MP3 is just under 40GB, so EVERYTHING fits onto my iriver..in fact I have around 4.6GB free since I delete duplicates or "alternative" versions...I mean do you really need 8 versions of the same song?? I certainly don't, but I dread to think how many versions of 'Strangers In The Night' I've got here and there.... Also got compilations, best of's, Rock/Chart show compilations some tracks duplicated. Also some sequential albums have one track from another album (REM for instance) I was just saying for the same price of the Sound Server I could outfit a whopper PC server, and store everything as lossless, or even if lossy highbitrate with thousands of albums (if you have that many) OK. Fair comment, in that case... Did you read the last message on the OGG v MP3 thread? (get latest Lame and OGG encoder) Most jobs in my life seem to start with clearing out the garage, in this case I've had to build me 'pot in a box' to get some *controlled* rips from vinyl (otherwise any comparison is meaningless to me - digital's ****ed to start off with!!). I'll record a 'standard' to both formats and try again (shortly....) but bear in mind my 'auditioner' has already picked MP3s over OGGs (over easy).... Lame? I've already heard that it isn't all it's cracked up to be? I keep an open mind.... :-) |
Info please
Nath wrote:
"Keith G" wrote in message .. . "Nath" wrote snip I was just saying for the same price of the Sound Server I could outfit a whopper PC server, and store everything as lossless, or even if lossy highbitrate with thousands of albums (if you have that many) Could you manage it for the price of the Cambridge (500UKP)? Or the laptop combo (factor in a 15" TFT)? Did you read the last message on the OGG v MP3 thread? (get latest Lame and OGG encoder) This is becoming increasingly tricky to call. Storage is becoming cheaper, and I'd guess that codecs will become more efficient. For future proof archiving surely the best way is just store wavs? 200Gb for 60UKP - what's that, about 15p per CD? When/if some bright spark comes up with the 1000:1 lossless codec there you have it. To move with the times you just keep encoding the wavs and replace your old compressed files with the new compression technique (for your iRiver, WHY); save time, optimal quality. Just my thought for the day. Back to bed :-) Rob |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:15 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk