![]() |
Power Cords
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 08:17:52 +0100, Tim S Kemp wrote:
Arny Krueger wrote: Most kettles are relatively low-powered compared to the appliances that are heavy-hitters. In the US self-heated kettles are far from the largest single users of power. Electric space heaters are near or at the top. Have you ever been to the UK? My kettle is 3.2kw. My shower is 10.5 Kw. Heating here is done mostly with gas (as in natural gas, not petrol) or oil (kerosene / diesel) If the US wasted less power in electric space heaters maybe the world would be a better place? Maybe if the UK didn't have people using 4 times the power of a space heater to operate a shower, the world would be an even better place. |
Power Cords
In article ,
AZ Nomad wrote: Maybe if the UK didn't have people using 4 times the power of a space heater to operate a shower, the world would be an even better place. The amount of power a shower uses depends on how much hot water it has to supply and at what temperature. And a 10 kW one only provides a dribble - anything less just wouldn't be acceptable. -- *"I am " is reportedly the shortest sentence in the English language. * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Power Cords
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 05:05:27 GMT, AZ Nomad wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 08:17:52 +0100, Tim S Kemp wrote: Arny Krueger wrote: Most kettles are relatively low-powered compared to the appliances that are heavy-hitters. In the US self-heated kettles are far from the largest single users of power. Electric space heaters are near or at the top. Have you ever been to the UK? My kettle is 3.2kw. My shower is 10.5 Kw. Heating here is done mostly with gas (as in natural gas, not petrol) or oil (kerosene / diesel) If the US wasted less power in electric space heaters maybe the world would be a better place? Maybe if the UK didn't have people using 4 times the power of a space heater to operate a shower, the world would be an even better place. Power is irrelevant to the question. Energy is what matters, which is power integrated over time. Using a 10kW shower for three minutes pales into insignificance beside any kind of space heater running for hours. The same goes for the kettle, which boils the water in a couple of minutes. d |
Power Cords
AZ Nomad wrote:
Maybe if the UK didn't have people using 4 times the power of a space heater to operate a shower, the world would be an even better place. And you heat your hot water using what? A 25kw gas heater? And a 5 min 10.5kw shower has less environmental impact than 3 hrs of a 2.5kw space heater! -- Just remember that you're standing on a planet that's evolving / And revolving at 900 miles an hour / That's orbiting at 19 miles a second, so it's reckoned, / A sun that is the source of all our power. / The sun and you and me and all the stars that we can see, / Are moving at a million miles a day / In an outer spiral arm, at 40,000 miles an hour, / Of the galaxy we call the Milky Way. |
Power Cords
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , AZ Nomad wrote: Maybe if the UK didn't have people using 4 times the power of a space heater to operate a shower, the world would be an even better place. The amount of power a shower uses depends on how much hot water it has to supply and at what temperature. And a 10 kW one only provides a dribble - anything less just wouldn't be acceptable. Always hate it in cheap hotels when there's a 6 kw shower... -- Just remember that you're standing on a planet that's evolving / And revolving at 900 miles an hour / That's orbiting at 19 miles a second, so it's reckoned, / A sun that is the source of all our power. / The sun and you and me and all the stars that we can see, / Are moving at a million miles a day / In an outer spiral arm, at 40,000 miles an hour, / Of the galaxy we call the Milky Way. |
Power Cords
"Keith G" wrote in message ... "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Keith G wrote: My kettle is 3.2kw. My shower is 10.5 Kw. Heating here is done mostly with gas (as in natural gas, not petrol) or oil (kerosene / diesel) While it lasts (ie remains 'economically gettable').... ;-) Then we'll have a problem with electricity too since the majority is generated from gas. I reckon natural gas supplies will be reserved for industrial processes in the not-too-distant future and domestic supplies will be phased out and that the future for electricity generation on a massive scale lies in the nucular domain with any amount of harebrained schemes to supplement it on a domestic level.... Anybody do the BBC1/Chan 4 'double news' like me tonight? We had a French baguette baker saying 'Ze nucular power? She is very good!' at the beginning of the BBC news (before the 'asking the reporters to make a guess' bit) and a wacky Shell advert featuring windfarms at the end of the Chan 4 news!! I rest my case... :-) |
Power Cords
"tony sayer" wrote in message
How much power does the original organ take? Non-trivial. The typical medium-sized pipe organ is powered by a 5-10 HP electric motor. I suspect the motors mostly just idle, but they don't idle for free. |
Power Cords
"Tim S Kemp" wrote in message
Arny Krueger wrote: Most kettles are relatively low-powered compared to the appliances that are heavy-hitters. In the US self-heated kettles are far from the largest single users of power. Electric space heaters are near or at the top. Have you ever been to the UK? Several times, but pulling the plumbing apart was not on my agenda for the visit. ;-) My kettle is 3.2kw. That would be *lots* in my book. We do have electric kettles, but the common domestic ones are limited to 1600 watts or so. Most are far smaller than that - used to heat enough water for a cup of soup, tea, coffee or cocoa. My shower is 10.5 Kw. Electric showers are not exactly common over here. Most people *learned* about electric water heaters and use natural gas powered water heaters in the 50,000 BTU range. Heating here is done mostly with gas (as in natural gas, not petrol) or oil (kerosene / diesel) I lived in Germany for about a year and things were like that. I lived in eastern Bavaria on an Army base and then in an apartment in a nearby small town. Oil was widely used, often still moved around in open buckets by hand. Natural gas delivered via pipelines is the overwhelming favorite in the US, with compressed Propane delivered and stored in pressurized tanks being the favorite in areas that lack pipeline connections. I understand that quite a bit of oil is still used in the northeast. The house I live in was built in 1933,. When I bought it in the 70s is used mostly oil heat, three rooms used electric heat, and there was an electric water heater. It didn't take too many huge energy bills to find things changed over to natural gas - my house now has two 90+% efficient central forced-air furnaces. There are two separate hybrid forced-air heating/cooling systems in my house, one for the central living area (kitchen/family room/bath), and one for the sleeping suites and their baths. They are controlled by 2 separate microcomputer-based thermostats with their own heating/cooling schedules and rules. We also have a highly-efficient wood-burning fireplace. We mostly have it for romance, and because firewood has been very cheap around here for much of the past 30 years due to two separate plagues on common trees - elms and ash. Use it mostly in the early fall and late spring. If the US wasted less power in electric space heaters maybe the world would be a better place? Electric space heaters are mostly just convenience items in the Great Lakes region - electric space heaters are used for chilly corners in buildings that are mainly heated by natural gas. They are usually limited to about 1600 watts. There was a time when electric power was very cheap in the sun belt and pacific coast. Some whole-house electric heat was used in temperate climates. It is still used in the sun belt portions of the US where the climate is very mild, and air conditioning is the dominant energy load. Most electric-powered climate control in the US is now based on "heat pumps" - bi-directional air conditioners based on a Freon cycle, or air conditioner/natural gas hybrid systems. The freon-cycle equipment is fairly efficient, in the climates where it is widely used. Its thermal efficiency is 200-300%. IOW one BTU equivalent of electricity moves 2-3 BTUs of heat either into or out of the house, as needed. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk