"CQ" wrote in message
news:1130423968.81c983a2e208793af2cf5eec4df7dc86@b ubbanews...
In article , Keith G said...

OK, it's lunchtime, I'll play.... :-)

Been let out to the playground, have you?


Hmm, weak start...



Btw, that'd be *arsehole* in ukra....

Ah, but there is so much more to the world than your little rec.audio
group.


Yes there's ukrav still alive and well apparently...??


I don't know for sure, it was a guess, hence the "perhaps". I don't care
much, it was more in the way of a musing. Nobody around here gives a
****


Doesn't look that way to me... :-)


but you do insist on inserting yourself in places where nobody cares
about your opinions so you are going to have to accept those of others in
return.


No sweetie, it's you MP3ers who are crossposting into ukra as far as I'm
concerned...



Optionally, you could just have the maturity to not read that which you
supposedly don't care/give a **** about, let alone respond to it.


What and pass up the chance to have a bit of fun with a prick like you??

Let me quote you the bit that sparked my response after the thread had been
running for nearly a week:

"
kkhkhkhkkgkgkkkkhkgkggkkkkhkjhlkuglkglkhglkhgklhgl khglkglkhgglkhgggggggggggg
gggggggggggggglkjhgljkhglkhglhglkhglkhglkhglkjhglk hglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhg
lkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglk hglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhg
lkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhlkhglkhlkgl klkhlkglkglkhglklkgklhglkg
kljglkglkgklglkglkglkglkglkjglkjlkgklglkglkjgklglk lkglklkglklkglkglkjglklkgl
kjgkljglkglkglkglkglkglkg

Have you figured it out yet? Keep working on it you stupid Hillbilly."


Indefensible really, isn't it?

But he wanks on regardless....


Yet you attempted to above? You are in such a hurry to demean you miss
the point and are demeaning yourself. Laughable.


I bet even you haven't got a clue what that nonsense means...??



No, nobody said anything about you being obliged.


Oh, does that mean I don't get to invoice you then?


Are you comprehension
challenged as well as attention deprived?


**** Nose. You tell me...


The fact is you chose to
attempt to answer the original question. I merely pointed out that to do
so required an opinion, not a simple yes or no.

Note: "its answer requires". Clear enough for you?

Seems you have a bit of a problem addressing the subject matter at hand
and want to resort to silly deflection. No surprise.


No, I'm sorry, my attention wandered - what was that again?


So I do get to invoice you then? Simple yes or no will do - seeing as you
are so fond of yes or no answers...

No, I think not. You have yet to deliver anything of value.


Really? Why are you queueing up for it then? Do you lack the maturity to
ignore something of no value?



Yes, but of everything you've lost I'm sure you miss your manners the
most, no? At least those strangers unlucky enough to encounter you in
public places certainly must miss your manners.


I must be slipping, I thought I was being quite polite - I haven't used the
phrase '******' yet, have I?



I guess....

shrug

Shrug? Is that meant to convey some sort of aloof lack of interest in
the point made? If that is the case then why respond at all?


shrug


You made an observation and an assumption that was in error. I corrected
your erroneous observation. Nobody can prevent a person such as you from
making assumptions, though.


Bummer, ain't it...?? ;-)



Simple enough for you?


Oh yes, you certainly are!


Ah, 'twas a matter of style. Forgive me if I don't always conform, in my
writing in a relaxed and informal forum, to the pedantic and narrow
minded view you seem to hold of what is and what is not correct.

- are you an American?

Is this meant to imply that only Americans are capable of misusing
punctuation?


It was a straightforward question. You read what imlications into you
like...


Are you so incredibly closed minded as to believe this?


Define 'incredibly'...


Have you never heard of James Joyce?


What are you going to do when you leave school?


Ah, so you are simply attempting to stir up **** because you find it to
be fun. I suspected as much.


Bravo!!

(Even thickies like you catch on in the end!! :-)



You've said 'tit' twice now - do you like that word?

Not particularly, no.


I do - it's succinct and comprehesive.



"Leak into UK newgroups"? Is your group new? Is your spelling going to
****e?


Still very weak....


Also, since you want to be the grammar police, what's up with all these
groups of four periods? Are they supposed to be ellipses? That's all
botched up, Keith.

An ellipsis is done like so: " . . . "



Don't fret too much about it - 'tis only a matter of style....



He'll think you are saying he looks like a woman's breast.

There you go again!

In order to "go again" I would have had to have repeated something I'd
said or done previously.

What exactly was that?

(I think you're enjoying this! :-)

Watching you make an idiot and more than a bit of an ass out of yourself


Doesn't 'flow' - brackets would have helped there, I think - no?


while you are trying to be clever yet showing yourself to be nothing more
than an insufferable little pedant and a self-important fool has been
mildly amusing, yes.

However, you are quickly becoming quite boring.


Oh good, does that mean I won't have to deal with another of your pathetic,
pompous, pricky posts then?



snip

You came here whining

I think you're the one doing the *whining*

Howzat again? Whining? Where would that be?


It's all one long whine...



moi beauty... ;-)

Well, the "moi" is misplaced but the other is the first thing you've
gotten even close to correct.


Oops, delusions of pulchritude here I suspect...

:-)



Everyone can't be blessed with such mundane cognomens as yours, Mr.
Garratt.


What do you suggest I change it to, Mr Q...???



Rather conjures up an image of someone being unsuccessfully strangled in
an attic, don't you think, Keith?


Hoo boy...

You tell me, C....



OTOH, if it is his real name, it shows he's got gut and doesn't hide
behind
summay tossy like 'CQ'....

Hide behind? You seem to enjoy attempting insult where none exists. I'm
not hiding behind anything. I'm using, as is the usenet convention, a
"nym" or "nickname" to post. Many folks who regularly read this
newsgroup know exactly who I am, where I live, what I do, etc. Hard to
be hiding when I'm in such plain site.


Site?

I think *you* are the one whose spelling's going to ****e, muchacho.. :-)




****in' terrible ain't I?? ;-)

Perhaps you would like to think so, but no. You are simply a typical
usenet pest with an overblown opinion of yourself.


Your the one who's dribbling **** all over the carpet in ukra - why should
anyone give a toss (I use the word deliberately) what you think??



We can add hypocrite to the
short list of attributes you have demonstrated in your short time in
the
amm group.

Go on then, why not if it makes you happy...?? :-)

Excuse me, but what sort of punctuation is that, exactly? Gone right
down the toilet again, haven't you, Keith? You certainly do provide
ample proof that even the British can butcher the English language, even
while you continue to try and nitpick the usage of others and make broad
and inapt generalizations about people you do not know.

Yes, hypocrite it is then.


Pot/kettle as they say... :-)

(Fekkin' priceless this ole boy!!)



You'll have to excuse me now - me tea's cooled down a bit!

I can't see how that concerns me or causes me to "have to excuse" you.
Perhaps you meant "please excuse me now"


No, I was telling you, not asking your permission.


but we already know you have
****-all for manners, right Keith old boy?


And you have the brass arse to try and pick me up on "Go on then, why not if
it makes you happy...??" :-)

Asitappens, I save my manners for people I like, respect and/or admire -
guess what, dip****....???

LOL!!

:-))

Nick Gorham wrote:

Always interesting to see how our colonial cousins see us.

Never mind Keith, you may not have a Jaguar, but at least you know how
to pronounce the name correctly :-).

You mean JAG-u-ar rather than JAG-war? Sorry, incorrect. The *correct*
way is ha-gu-AR.

--
dadiOH
____________________________

dadiOH's dandies v3.06...
....a help file of info about MP3s, recording from
LP/cassette and tips & tricks on this and that.
Get it at http://mysite.verizon.net/xico

Nick Gorham wrote:

Never mind Keith, you may not have a Jaguar, but at least you know how
to pronounce the name correctly :-).

At least I don't hallucinate that I can hear someone's voice through
their writing, goofball. The truth about the U.K. for you bumbling,
self-congratulatory BritNerds is quite amusing, really, since your
country is not much less redneck and working class than the U.S. Maybe
you should leave your comfy urban flat once in a while. ****in' geek.

Fortunately, it's only in your own deluded minds that most other U.K.
citizens would support your juvenile anti-Americanism.

--
Joel Crump

"Of course, it is ironic that a media company [Fox News Channel] that
should be seeking to protect the First Amendment is seeking to
undermine it by claiming a monopoly on the phrase 'fair and balanced.'"
- Judge Denny Chin, referring to Fox News accusing Al Franken of
trademark infringement.

In article , Keith G said...

Let me quote you the bit that sparked my response after the thread had been
running for nearly a week:

Snip the village idiot's drunken stupidity which Mr. Garratt feels the
need to repost for some strange reason.

Indefensible really, isn't it?

Ah, okay. So your response was in reality, according to you, aimed at
the one who wrote that. I see.

But then, after I told you that most folks here ignore that idiot, you
said:

"there seem to be plenty of people
in amm who are equally silly enough to respond to him...."

So, in reality, you are amongst those silly enough to respond to the
idiocy you have now quoted above and, in fact, your rude and obnoxious
response and further attempts to insult and demean those you do not know
have now carried on the thread for a number of posts. Is that about
right?

Hypocrite it is, then.

insert clever "takes one to know one" sort of comment here

oh, go on. . . you know you want to

Later in your post you go on to say:

I think *you* are the one whose spelling's going to ****e, muchacho.. :-)

and then . . .

Your the one who's dribbling **** all over the carpet in ukra - why should
anyone give a toss (I use the word deliberately) what you think??

Like so much of what you write this simply underscores what an idiot you
are. While your spell-checker can help you out with the simple parts it
apparently can't do a thing about your inability to distinguish between
"your" and "you're".

As far as dribbling and drooling go, you would be the one who came into
the amm group gratuitously insulting any and all who took offense at your
offensive nature and behavior, something you are apparently helpless to
control.

All cross posted and off-topic in the name of putting a stop to cross
posting of off-topic threads, too.

Remarkably hypocritical, donchathink?

Asitappens, I save my manners for people I like, respect and/or admire -

Ah, okay. So you don't really lack manners; what you lack is grace and
decency? Got it.

guess what, dip****....???

Oh dear. A man whom I have already called a pompous ass, a buffoon, a
rude and arrogant fool as well as an asshole has taken it upon himself to
attempt to now make it clear that he doesn't like me. How odd.

How very strange that he would now think I would give a **** one way or
another how he feels.

No sense in making sense at this point, eh Keith?
--
CQ

"CQ" wrote in message
news:1130433510.5b5a2b2a03fb832842535c72f62ffc81@b ubbanews...
In article , Keith G said...

Let me quote you the bit that sparked my response after the thread had
been
running for nearly a week:

Snip the village idiot's drunken stupidity which Mr. Garratt feels the
need to repost for some strange reason.


Oh dear, the veneer of respectability and pseudo-sophistication is starting
to slip a bit isn't it...??

Do you mean this:

"
kkhkhkhkkgkgkkkkhkgkggkkkkhkjhlkuglkglkhglkhgklhgl khglkglkhgglkhgggggggggggg
gggggggggggggglkjhgljkhglkhglhglkhglkhglkhglkjhglk hglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhg
lkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglk hglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhg
lkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhlkhglkhlkgl klkhlkglkglkhglklkgklhglkg
kljglkglkgklglkglkglkglkglkjglkjlkgklglkglkjgklglk lkglklkglklkglkglkjglklkgl
kjgkljglkglkglkglkglkglkg

Have you figured it out yet? Keep working on it you stupid Hillbilly."


:-)


LOL!!


Indefensible really, isn't it?

Ah, okay. So your response was in reality, according to you, aimed at
the one who wrote that. I see.

But then, after I told you that most folks here ignore that idiot, you
said:

"there seem to be plenty of people
in amm who are equally silly enough to respond to him...."


As they do - where's the lie?



So, in reality, you are amongst those silly enough to respond to the
idiocy you have now quoted above and, in fact, your rude and obnoxious
response and further attempts to insult and demean those you do not know


If I were you I would check my 'colleagues' posts before I made a fatuous
remark like that...


have now carried on the thread for a number of posts. Is that about
right?


Oh dear, more silly questions....

Tell you what sunshine, you have a nice quiet little wank all on your
ownsome, I've gotta go out now.


rest of the silly **** snipped


Any further replies (on and offlist) will have to wait until I get back. -
That's not you Quentin, you're all out of Brownie Points. (I've been more
than patient with you, as any ukranian will tell you.) Next time you think
to come galloping up like amm's very own No. 1 Vigilante and start plucking
at your stubby little dick to try and scare some crusty old git like me, I
suggest you take time out to properly assess your prospective opponent -
this one, this time, you'll be relieved to hear, is all done with teaching
you the finer arts of 'lively Usenet debate'... :-)

LOL!!

:-))

"Keith G" wrote in message news

snip

:-)

LOL!!

snip 'lively Usenet debate'... :-)

LOL!!

:-))

============

What's with the nervous laughter in all your posts?


Don

"Keith G" wrote in message
...
"Nick Gorham" wrote...
Always interesting to see how our colonial cousins see us.

Never mind Keith, you may not have a Jaguar, but at least you
know how to pronounce the name correctly :-).

Should do - I've had two of 'em!! :-)

No doubt.
Something like this, I'd wager:
http://tinyurl.com/d5dlt

- Loco -
(Now Playing: Drive - The Cars)

dadiOH wrote:
audiohead wrote:
dadiOH wrote:
You really should spend a little time trying to learn the terms and
what is actually happening when you rip/encode/"play"-decode. I
don't think an understanding of same is beyond even your
demonstrated, meager intelligence.

That says a lot from someone who doesn't even know that files can be
edited in Nero.

Your memory is worse than your "advice".

You must really enjoy making a fool out of yourself. Are all UK bloats
as ignoble as you or are you just one of those special cases? You
lost this one a long time ago. I guess your UK Ego bruises easier than
most of your other fellow bloats. Too bad.

You advised someone to edit MP3s using the Nero WAVE editor. I pointed
out that the Nero WAVE editor doesn't edit MP3s, it edits waves.

Audio files, WAV and MP3 alike, are edited in "Nero Wave Editor," which
is only a part of an entire product suite. Obviously, you lied about
using Nero and are still trying to redeem yourself. This is really
pathetic. I would have expected more from a UK bloat. You should be
ashamed of yourself for your fellow compatriots!!

Like any other WAVE editor. Any WAVE editor first decodes the MP3 to WAVE
then re-encodes that WAVE to MP3 when one has finished editing.

You don't "re-encode" a WAV to MP3. It's either decode a MP3 or encode
to MP3. Besides this has nothing to do with the OP. Perhaps you need
to study your own so called informative website more often, and try to
learn something instead of spouting pure gibberish.


Since the OP was wanting to chop off silence a wave editor was a poor choice
as there are programs that can do it directly to the MP3 without the
necessity of decoding/encoding.


The OP was only trying to split tracks. Go back to the OP and look at
it again...and again....and again. You really have become senile.


Try to comprehend the forgoing, it is a simple concept. Read it
multiple times as needed to understand.

Learn from you own advice. This is especially true for "Inattentive
Types" like you. Apparently, re-reading hasn't and likely won't work.


You really need to get away from this forum once in awhile and actually
have a life. I'm actually starting to feel sorry for you. Seriously,
when's the last time you even got laid?


--
daddickiOH

Joel wrote:
Nick Gorham wrote:


Never mind Keith, you may not have a Jaguar, but at least you know how
to pronounce the name correctly :-).


At least I don't hallucinate that I can hear someone's voice through
their writing, goofball. The truth about the U.K. for you bumbling,
self-congratulatory BritNerds is quite amusing, really, since your
country is not much less redneck and working class than the U.S. Maybe
you should leave your comfy urban flat once in a while. ****in' geek.

And I don't assume that I can guess where someone lives through their
posting either.


Fortunately, it's only in your own deluded minds that most other U.K.
citizens would support your juvenile anti-Americanism.


Ahh, and you know what "most other" UK *subjects* believe, must be a
hell of a internet connection you have there.

--
Nick

audiohead wrote:

You must really enjoy making a fool out of yourself. Are all UK
bloats as ignoble as you or are you just one of those special cases?
You lost this one a long time ago. I guess your UK Ego bruises
easier than most of your other fellow bloats. Too bad.

Speaking of making a fool of oneself...

I was born in Indiana, lived most of my life in Honolulu, then Veracruz,
Mexico, then Florida.

I have been all over the Pacific basin, North/Central/South America and
the Carribean but I have never set foot in either England or the UK.
_____________________

You advised someone to edit MP3s using the Nero WAVE editor. I
pointed out that the Nero WAVE editor doesn't edit MP3s, it edits
waves.

Audio files, WAV and MP3 alike, are edited in "Nero Wave Editor,"

And before the ****ing MP3s are edited in the WAVE editor they are
decoded to *wave*, you freakin', dense idiot.
_________________

which is only a part of an entire product suite. Obviously, you
lied about using Nero and are still trying to redeem yourself. This
is really pathetic.


Obviously, you don't have a clue about the relationship between MP3s and
waves. And you are too stupid to learn.

____________________

Like any other WAVE editor. Any WAVE editor first decodes the MP3
to WAVE then re-encodes that WAVE to MP3 when one has finished
editing.

You don't "re-encode" a WAV to MP3. It's either decode a MP3 or
encode
to MP3.

See? I told you...too stupid to learn.

____________________

Since the OP was wanting to chop off silence a wave editor was a
poor choice as there are programs that can do it directly to the MP3
without the necessity of decoding/encoding.


The OP was only trying to split tracks. .

No matter, a wave editor wasn't the best choice for what he needed.
Better to use something that would do it directly to the MP3 rather than
something that would decode it to wave then re-encode to MP3. Too
stupid to learn...


--
dadiOH
____________________________

dadiOH's dandies v3.06...
....a help file of info about MP3s, recording from
LP/cassette and tips & tricks on this and that.
Get it at http://mysite.verizon.net/xico