Audio Banter

Audio Banter (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/)
-   -   Whats a dBu ? (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/3453-whats-dbu.html)

Jeff November 7th 05 02:41 PM

What's a dBu ?
 

"
Should be relative to a microvolt into a 600 Ohm load.


Forget microVolt!
0 dBu is steady AF established at 775 milliVolts line level -- regardless
of load Z.


It is an easy mistake to make, because dB relative to a microvolt is often
written as dBu rather than
using the Greek letter 'mu'; a limitation of the ASCII character set!!

Jeff



Don Pearce November 7th 05 03:14 PM

What's a dBu ?
 
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:41:48 -0000, "Jeff" wrote:


"
Should be relative to a microvolt into a 600 Ohm load.


Forget microVolt!
0 dBu is steady AF established at 775 milliVolts line level -- regardless
of load Z.


It is an easy mistake to make, because dB relative to a microvolt is often
written as dBu rather than
using the Greek letter 'mu'; a limitation of the ASCII character set!!

Jeff


dB relative to a microvolt is written as dBuV, so there need be no
confusion.

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Prometheus November 7th 05 06:30 PM

What's a dBu ?
 
In article , Don Pearce
writes
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:41:48 -0000, "Jeff" wrote:


"
Should be relative to a microvolt into a 600 Ohm load.

Forget microVolt!
0 dBu is steady AF established at 775 milliVolts line level -- regardless
of load Z.


It is an easy mistake to make, because dB relative to a microvolt is often
written as dBu rather than
using the Greek letter 'mu'; a limitation of the ASCII character set!!

Jeff


dB relative to a microvolt is written as dBuV, so there need be no
confusion.


Rather as dB relative to one miliwatt should be written dBmW to avoid
people thinking it is miliampere. The unit should always be specified
where there is potential for confusion, although current practice can
omit it.

--
Ian G8ILZ

Jeff November 7th 05 06:39 PM

What's a dBu ?
 

It is an easy mistake to make, because dB relative to a microvolt is often
written as dBu rather than
using the Greek letter 'mu'; a limitation of the ASCII character set!!

Jeff


dB relative to a microvolt is written as dBuV, so there need be no
confusion.


Well I am afraid that RF engineers are a lazy breed and it is often written
as dBu, much in the same way as dBm.

Jeff



Don Pearce November 7th 05 06:55 PM

What's a dBu ?
 
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:30:34 +0000, Prometheus
wrote:

In article , Don Pearce
writes
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:41:48 -0000, "Jeff" wrote:


"
Should be relative to a microvolt into a 600 Ohm load.

Forget microVolt!
0 dBu is steady AF established at 775 milliVolts line level -- regardless
of load Z.

It is an easy mistake to make, because dB relative to a microvolt is often
written as dBu rather than
using the Greek letter 'mu'; a limitation of the ASCII character set!!

Jeff


dB relative to a microvolt is written as dBuV, so there need be no
confusion.


Rather as dB relative to one miliwatt should be written dBmW to avoid
people thinking it is miliampere. The unit should always be specified
where there is potential for confusion, although current practice can
omit it.


Far too late, I'm afraid. The dBm is far too well established.

d

Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Ian Jackson November 7th 05 06:56 PM

What's a dBu ?
 
In message , Jeff
writes

It is an easy mistake to make, because dB relative to a microvolt is often
written as dBu rather than
using the Greek letter 'mu'; a limitation of the ASCII character set!!

Jeff


dB relative to a microvolt is written as dBuV, so there need be no
confusion.


Well I am afraid that RF engineers are a lazy breed and it is often written
as dBu, much in the same way as dBm.

Jeff


After 41 years in the cable TV industry, I've NEVER seen dBmV or dBμV
written abbreviated. Spoken, you occasionally hear only 'dB' from the
careless.
Ian.
--


Don Pearce November 7th 05 06:56 PM

What's a dBu ?
 
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:39:02 -0000, "Jeff" wrote:


It is an easy mistake to make, because dB relative to a microvolt is often
written as dBu rather than
using the Greek letter 'mu'; a limitation of the ASCII character set!!

Jeff


dB relative to a microvolt is written as dBuV, so there need be no
confusion.


Well I am afraid that RF engineers are a lazy breed and it is often written
as dBu, much in the same way as dBm.

Jeff


Well, I've been an RF engineer all my life, and I've never come across
dBu instead of dBuV.

d

Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Jeff November 7th 05 07:02 PM

What's a dBu ?
 
Well, I've been an RF engineer all my life, and I've never come across
dBu instead of dBuV.


Obviously Pearce Consulting are not as lazy as some!! (;_))

Jeff



Don Pearce November 7th 05 07:19 PM

What's a dBu ?
 
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:02:15 -0000, "Jeff" wrote:

Well, I've been an RF engineer all my life, and I've never come across
dBu instead of dBuV.


Obviously Pearce Consulting are not as lazy as some!! (;_))

Jeff


Mmmmm..... I reckon it's just you. ;-)

d

Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Jeff November 7th 05 07:25 PM

What's a dBu ?
 
Mmmmm..... I reckon it's just you. ;-)

d

Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com


Then try doing a little research on the web then, you will find at least
four usages of "dBu".

The correct one,

dB rel 1 micro volt, when written without access to mu,

dB rel 1 micro volt/m (used by the FCC)

and dB rel 1 micro Watt (mainly sat downlink people).

Regards
Jeff




All times are GMT. The time now is 01:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk