![]() |
What's a dBu ?
" Should be relative to a microvolt into a 600 Ohm load. Forget microVolt! 0 dBu is steady AF established at 775 milliVolts line level -- regardless of load Z. It is an easy mistake to make, because dB relative to a microvolt is often written as dBu rather than using the Greek letter 'mu'; a limitation of the ASCII character set!! Jeff |
What's a dBu ?
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:41:48 -0000, "Jeff" wrote:
" Should be relative to a microvolt into a 600 Ohm load. Forget microVolt! 0 dBu is steady AF established at 775 milliVolts line level -- regardless of load Z. It is an easy mistake to make, because dB relative to a microvolt is often written as dBu rather than using the Greek letter 'mu'; a limitation of the ASCII character set!! Jeff dB relative to a microvolt is written as dBuV, so there need be no confusion. d Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
What's a dBu ?
In article , Don Pearce
writes On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:41:48 -0000, "Jeff" wrote: " Should be relative to a microvolt into a 600 Ohm load. Forget microVolt! 0 dBu is steady AF established at 775 milliVolts line level -- regardless of load Z. It is an easy mistake to make, because dB relative to a microvolt is often written as dBu rather than using the Greek letter 'mu'; a limitation of the ASCII character set!! Jeff dB relative to a microvolt is written as dBuV, so there need be no confusion. Rather as dB relative to one miliwatt should be written dBmW to avoid people thinking it is miliampere. The unit should always be specified where there is potential for confusion, although current practice can omit it. -- Ian G8ILZ |
What's a dBu ?
It is an easy mistake to make, because dB relative to a microvolt is often written as dBu rather than using the Greek letter 'mu'; a limitation of the ASCII character set!! Jeff dB relative to a microvolt is written as dBuV, so there need be no confusion. Well I am afraid that RF engineers are a lazy breed and it is often written as dBu, much in the same way as dBm. Jeff |
What's a dBu ?
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:30:34 +0000, Prometheus
wrote: In article , Don Pearce writes On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:41:48 -0000, "Jeff" wrote: " Should be relative to a microvolt into a 600 Ohm load. Forget microVolt! 0 dBu is steady AF established at 775 milliVolts line level -- regardless of load Z. It is an easy mistake to make, because dB relative to a microvolt is often written as dBu rather than using the Greek letter 'mu'; a limitation of the ASCII character set!! Jeff dB relative to a microvolt is written as dBuV, so there need be no confusion. Rather as dB relative to one miliwatt should be written dBmW to avoid people thinking it is miliampere. The unit should always be specified where there is potential for confusion, although current practice can omit it. Far too late, I'm afraid. The dBm is far too well established. d Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
What's a dBu ?
In message , Jeff
writes It is an easy mistake to make, because dB relative to a microvolt is often written as dBu rather than using the Greek letter 'mu'; a limitation of the ASCII character set!! Jeff dB relative to a microvolt is written as dBuV, so there need be no confusion. Well I am afraid that RF engineers are a lazy breed and it is often written as dBu, much in the same way as dBm. Jeff After 41 years in the cable TV industry, I've NEVER seen dBmV or dBμV written abbreviated. Spoken, you occasionally hear only 'dB' from the careless. Ian. -- |
What's a dBu ?
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:39:02 -0000, "Jeff" wrote:
It is an easy mistake to make, because dB relative to a microvolt is often written as dBu rather than using the Greek letter 'mu'; a limitation of the ASCII character set!! Jeff dB relative to a microvolt is written as dBuV, so there need be no confusion. Well I am afraid that RF engineers are a lazy breed and it is often written as dBu, much in the same way as dBm. Jeff Well, I've been an RF engineer all my life, and I've never come across dBu instead of dBuV. d Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
What's a dBu ?
Well, I've been an RF engineer all my life, and I've never come across
dBu instead of dBuV. Obviously Pearce Consulting are not as lazy as some!! (;_)) Jeff |
What's a dBu ?
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:02:15 -0000, "Jeff" wrote:
Well, I've been an RF engineer all my life, and I've never come across dBu instead of dBuV. Obviously Pearce Consulting are not as lazy as some!! (;_)) Jeff Mmmmm..... I reckon it's just you. ;-) d Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
What's a dBu ?
Mmmmm..... I reckon it's just you. ;-)
d Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com Then try doing a little research on the web then, you will find at least four usages of "dBu". The correct one, dB rel 1 micro volt, when written without access to mu, dB rel 1 micro volt/m (used by the FCC) and dB rel 1 micro Watt (mainly sat downlink people). Regards Jeff |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk