Audio Banter

Audio Banter (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/)
-   -   Radford crossover problems (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/3464-radford-crossover-problems.html)

sbring November 13th 05 10:42 AM

Radford crossover problems
 
The discussion about bi-wiring is interesting but not very relevant for
my original question. And the problems seem even worse than i first
thought. It suddenly dawned on me that I cannot be sure that the FN12A
is the right Xover for my speakers, since i don't know if the Studio
360 and the Monitor 180 used the same impedance drivers. My units came
from a Studio system to my Monitors. A possible thought is that the
Studios with their ten units used 4 ohms instead of 8 ohms to
compensate for twice the number of drivers. So first of all I need to
find out if the Studio and the Monitor used the same kind of drivers.

Sven


Iain M Churches November 13th 05 01:23 PM

Radford crossover problems
 

"sbring" wrote in message
oups.com...
The discussion about bi-wiring is interesting but not very relevant for
my original question. And the problems seem even worse than i first
thought. It suddenly dawned on me that I cannot be sure that the FN12A
is the right Xover for my speakers, since i don't know if the Studio
360 and the Monitor 180 used the same impedance drivers. My units came
from a Studio system to my Monitors. A possible thought is that the
Studios with their ten units used 4 ohms instead of 8 ohms to
compensate for twice the number of drivers. So first of all I need to
find out if the Studio and the Monitor used the same kind of drivers.

Sven


Contact Mike Davis at the a-mail address I posted earlier in the
thread. Woodside are Radford experts.

Iain



housetrained November 14th 05 07:17 AM

Radford crossover problems
 
Am I missing something? www.sonicdesign.se/biwire.html

--
John the West Ham fan


"Kalman Rubinson" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:53:44 GMT, "housetrained"
wrote:

WRONG I don't mean bi-amp ( which requires an amp for each cone.) Bi-wire
means you allocate a wire for each cone - from the same amp output. Seems
strange but it works. The separate wires stop interference.


Nonsense. And how does this bypass the crossovers?

Kal




Kalman Rubinson November 14th 05 05:50 PM

Radford crossover problems
 
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 08:17:10 GMT, "housetrained"
wrote:

Am I missing something? www.sonicdesign.se/biwire.html


There are specific errors of fact in addition to curious explanations
so it is hard to distinguish the logical errors here from those due to
poor translation. Nothing that has not been said (and debunked)
before.

Kal




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk