On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:48:27 +0000 (UTC), "neutron"
wrote:
"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:09:58 +0000 (UTC), "neutron"
wrote:
"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:19:46 +0000 (UTC), "neutron"
wrote:
"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:26:51 +0000 (UTC), "neutron"
wrote:
"Stebbo" wrote in message
roups.com...
Have you seen this which was published in Saturdays Guardian.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/badscience/
I follow a couple of`Forums on the internet. It has caused a lot
of
wriggling a squirming from a few belivers / snake oil sellers.
e.g http://www.hifiwigwam.com/forum1/2806.html
I wonder if anyone will take up the challenge.?
I would do one for interconnects. Power cables I'm not so happy
about
doing
as it would be much harder I think.
They're all *impossible*, as you will discover. To avoid excessive
embarrassment, try it with a friend before entering into the full
challenge. I suspect that this is what happens with all the
loudmouthed subjectivists, who never actually step up to the plate
despite shrill claims of 'night and day' differences under sighted
conditions.
It's not at all impossible, it's just difficult, because they affect
the
sound in subtle ways.
Bull****. Just try it, then slip quietly away........
I have tried it. And I'm right. Have you tried it?
Lots of times - which is why I know it's bull****. You of course
refuse to put your claims to the test, so one must reasonably suppose
that you also know it's bull****.
No I have tested it and it works. Your hearing is either pants or you're
lying. I think you're lying.
My hearing is not at issue. *You* are the one making the bull****
claims, but chickening out of proving them.
--
Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering