wrote in message
oups.com...


He answered:
That any difference was too small to be audible.

I have a suggestion for him to prove his point without fail. It is an
article of faith in the chapel that tubed amplifiers are worse than
Solid State and that SET tubed amplifiers
are the worst of the worst. From "good" to "very. very bad" there
should be an "audible difference". If the "test" with his improved
protocol fails to make a decent-sized average audio buyers panel hear
that difference with statistical validity then what is the point of
it?.
My guess is that if he ever takes up the bet he will get another null
"The majority heard no difference" outcome.
But there is another terrifying scenario: They heard the differnce AND
liked the SET better. Horrors!
Two excellent reason to continue spouting speculation and avoid the
experiment
Ludovic Mirabel.


See, the trick is they will only test what they eant to show as no
difference.
What they want to claim as differnt, they will NOT test. There "excuse" is
claiming that one is a subtle difference, but the other is an
obvious difference. But maybe the test is so poorly
designed that it even obfuscates obvious differences.
this is eothing they do not want to see, and
do not want others to see.

Of course, the other major flaw is that it does not remove the bias of
preconceiving that things sound the same.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access