![]() |
The things you see when ya go lookin'......
"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... In article , Iain Churches wrote: [big snip] Jim. The specification comes straight from an EBU manual. Serge was able to describe the device more lucidly than I, without having to refer to the broadcast handbook. The inductance, is a design value in the spec. "80H or better" My units are were slightly less. OK, thanks. I was curious about this as result of the strange claims made by 'Silk' comparing the transformer attenuator with a simple potential divider. So far as I can see, both types can be expected to have a setting-dependent bandwidth, despite the implication of what Silk have been quoted as saying. Hence it seems odd for them to give this as a reason for all the extra cost and complications. This then prompted me to wonder about the uncoupled inductances, parasitic capacitances, etc, that would allow someone to estimate the actual bandwidth in use of the transformers. Since you quoted the 80H I wondered if you knew the other relevant values for your transformer... Slainte, Jim The reponse is 10Hz to 100kHz +/- 0.5dB at all settings. THD is 0.05% driving at +18dBu 50Hz. Iain |
The things you see when ya go lookin'......
In article , Iain Churches
wrote: "Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... This then prompted me to wonder about the uncoupled inductances, parasitic capacitances, etc, that would allow someone to estimate the actual bandwidth in use of the transformers. Since you quoted the 80H I wondered if you knew the other relevant values for your transformer... The reponse is 10Hz to 100kHz +/- 0.5dB at all settings. THD is 0.05% driving at +18dBu 50Hz. With what assumed/.chosen source, load, and cable impedances? e.g. does it assume a 600 Ohm source, a 10k load, and ignore cable capacitances? I assume you mean "not less than" for the values you quote, since the real values could be expected to vary with the tapping. (?) The 'Silk' transformer data seems to say nothing about parasitic capacitances, etc. Not about the winding resistances. Since they claim a very high inductance and imply they use many turns of tiny wires, I wonder what the levels of these parasitics might be. Slainte, Jim -- Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk