WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On 2 Mar 2006 15:50:23 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:
WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE
2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
In the latter part of 2004, at the request of leading members, I
started a major project called KISS on rec.audio.tubes (RAT). Pinkerton
arrived and announced he would deconstruct the project. Between the
beginning of October 2004 and the middle of February 2006 he sent 4607
messages to RAT, a labour conservatively estimated to have taken him
767 hours, or more than a quarter of his working hours in the same
period, the major part of his free time.
Psychotic rants ignored out of pity, but one point noted: Every one of
my posts on this subject was matched by a significantly longer one
from Jute, and he is the one who keeps creating pure attack threads,
as he did right from my very first post on KISS. Interested readers
can draw the obvious conclusions regarding psychotic fixations.
Given that I know how much time I spend at my keyboard (about an hour
a day *total*), I also doubt the 4607 figure. God knows how much time
he's going to devote to this current series of psychotic attacks.
--
When I did a Google search for the words Andre, Jute, McCoy, with you as the
author, I only got 2000 total. Of course that could mean that many of them
simply had mention of his name and were not neccessarily posts that warned
people about how incompetent he is. They could have simply been warnings of
his Muchausen disease and why people should not take him too seriously.
Either way it simply more evidence that he counts about as well as designs
amps. :-)
|
Hybrid Mode
