WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE

**Stewart Pinkerton** · March 14th 06, 06:03 AM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 01:01:14 GMT, MINe 109
wrote:

In article .com,
"ScottW" wrote:

Here's my hypothesis... If the Arcam sounds different... it probably
has a tweeked FR or some subtle distortion.

My CD23 FMJ sounds different from my AMC CD8a. The Arcam sounds more
correct.

Evidence for this wild assertion? Is this based on price and
reputation?
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

**MiNe 109** · March 14th 06, 12:17 PM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion

In article ,
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 01:01:14 GMT, MINe 109
wrote:

In article .com,
"ScottW" wrote:

Here's my hypothesis... If the Arcam sounds different... it probably
has a tweeked FR or some subtle distortion.

My CD23 FMJ sounds different from my AMC CD8a. The Arcam sounds more
correct.

Evidence for this wild assertion? Is this based on price and
reputation?

Casual use in the same system, and, no. I bought the AMC online on the
assumption that it wouldn't sound different from what I was used to and
because it had XLR outputs.

Oh, well.

Stephen