Audio Banter

Audio Banter (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/)
-   -   Super discussion about negative numbers on the BBC (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/3787-super-discussion-about-negative-numbers.html)

Andre Jute March 10th 06 01:13 AM

Super discussion about negative numbers on the BBC
 
Super radio discussion about the history of negative numbers:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/aod/netwo...dio4/inourtime

Andre Jute


Dave Plowman (News) March 10th 06 01:24 PM

Super discussion about negative numbers on the BBC
 
In article .com,
Andre Jute wrote:
Super radio discussion about the history of negative numbers:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/aod/netwo...dio4/inourtime


It was good, wasn't it? Progs like this make R4 worth the entire TV
licence. ;-)

--
*I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

[email protected] March 10th 06 02:23 PM

Super discussion about negative numbers on the BBC
 
When it gets into " i ", things get really interesting.

I was once greatly surprised running into a lecture on i once, from
none-other than a purchasing agent for a box-maker... pre-computer. He
showed me his equations for getting the maximum use of a given width
and length of corrugated cardboard (roll) sheeting... each one included
i. This guy was a high-school drop-out, but he used 'imaginary numbers'
every day.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA


Don Pearce March 10th 06 02:27 PM

Super discussion about negative numbers on the BBC
 
On 10 Mar 2006 07:23:35 -0800, " wrote:

When it gets into " i ", things get really interesting.

I was once greatly surprised running into a lecture on i once, from
none-other than a purchasing agent for a box-maker... pre-computer. He
showed me his equations for getting the maximum use of a given width
and length of corrugated cardboard (roll) sheeting... each one included
i. This guy was a high-school drop-out, but he used 'imaginary numbers'
every day.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA


What is this "i" thing? I know all about "j".

d

Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

[email protected] March 10th 06 02:32 PM

Super discussion about negative numbers on the BBC
 
" i " is the square root of -1.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA


Don Pearce March 10th 06 02:48 PM

Super discussion about negative numbers on the BBC
 
On 10 Mar 2006 07:32:55 -0800, " wrote:

" i " is the square root of -1.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA


No, "j" is the square root of -1. "i" must be something else
entirely...

d

Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

[email protected] March 10th 06 02:54 PM

Super discussion about negative numbers on the BBC
 
http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/58251.html

Wrong side of the pond thing, you Brits? Or is it that you need to be
ahead of us Colonials... and go all the way to j?

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA


Serge Auckland March 10th 06 02:57 PM

Super discussion about negative numbers on the BBC
 

"Don Pearce" wrote in message
...
On 10 Mar 2006 07:32:55 -0800, " wrote:

" i " is the square root of -1.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA


No, "j" is the square root of -1. "i" must be something else
entirely...

d

Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com


i *is* the square root of -1, so is j and so is k.

S.



Glenn Booth March 10th 06 03:01 PM

Super discussion about negative numbers on the BBC
 
Hi,

"Don Pearce" wrote in message
...
On 10 Mar 2006 07:23:35 -0800, " wrote:


What is this "i" thing? I know all about "j".


My exam board (way back when there were 'O' levels)
had some problems with this - people who took 'A'
levels in both maths (where it was 'i') and physics (where
it was 'j') often got them mixed up, and lost marks. There
was a minor rebellion, and in the end the mathematicians
lost. The square root of -1 was termed "j" from then on.

It's probably a moot point now - the last Physics A level
paper I looked at required no knowledge of either. a.c.
electricity is now the domain of Universities, it would seem.

Regards,

Glenn.




Glenn Booth March 10th 06 03:05 PM

Super discussion about negative numbers on the BBC
 
Hi,

"Don Pearce" wrote in message
...
On 10 Mar 2006 07:32:55 -0800, " wrote:

" i " is the square root of -1.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA


No, "j" is the square root of -1. "i" must be something else
entirely...


Indeed. "i" is measured in amperes, and the square
root of -1 isn't.

Regards,

Glenn.





All times are GMT. The time now is 01:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk