The extraordinary insensitivity of "audiophiles" on UKRA, RAT and RAO

**Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!** · March 15th 06, 12:04 AM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion

From: Andre Jute
Date: Tues, Mar 14 2006 11:52 am
Email: "Andre Jute"

Let's see who apologizes and who adds abuse to the nauseating
insensitivity and appallingly poor manners they have already displayed
for 10 days and 128 messages

Well, I also posted to the thread when it said that Pinkerton was
unreliable (started by you, it appears).

So if I apologize to you, I must then also apologize to Stewart. Since
he likes and eats haggis, I'm afraid that isn't possible. I've had
haggis and it's disgusting.

I would also point out that you, to be fair, should probably apologize
to Stewart for negatively dragging his name into a thread title, which
could also be called 'insensitive.' Goose, gander, and all.

So, even though I do not pay much attention to thread titles (like most
here, I'd imagine), since I have posted to both threads, and since I
will not apologize to a haggis-eater, I guess that means you'd better
put me in with the trailer park trash. TIA...:-)

**Keith G** · March 15th 06, 12:11 AM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
From: Andre Jute
Date: Tues, Mar 14 2006 11:52 am
Email: "Andre Jute"

Let's see who apologizes and who adds abuse to the nauseating
insensitivity and appallingly poor manners they have already displayed
for 10 days and 128 messages

Well, I also posted to the thread when it said that Pinkerton was
unreliable (started by you, it appears).

So if I apologize to you, I must then also apologize to Stewart. Since
he likes and eats haggis, I'm afraid that isn't possible. I've had
haggis and it's disgusting.

I would also point out that you, to be fair, should probably apologize
to Stewart for negatively dragging his name into a thread title, which
could also be called 'insensitive.' Goose, gander, and all.

So, even though I do not pay much attention to thread titles (like most
here, I'd imagine), since I have posted to both threads, and since I
will not apologize to a haggis-eater, I guess that means you'd better
put me in with the trailer park trash. TIA...:-)

Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...

**Warm Blue Glow** · March 15th 06, 01:01 AM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion

From: Keith G
Date: Tues, Mar 14 2006 7:11 pm
Email: "Keith G"

Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...

Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...

LOL! We can do this indefinitely...

**Stewart Pinkerton** · March 15th 06, 06:40 AM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion

On 14 Mar 2006 18:01:50 -0800, "Warm Blue Glow"
wrote:

From: Keith G
Date: Tues, Mar 14 2006 7:11 pm
Email: "Keith G"

Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...

Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...

LOL! We can do this indefinitely...

Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

**Keith G** · March 16th 06, 05:32 PM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On 14 Mar 2006 18:01:50 -0800, "Warm Blue Glow"
wrote:

From: Keith G
Date: Tues, Mar 14 2006 7:11 pm
Email: "Keith G"

Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...

Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...

LOL! We can do this indefinitely...

Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...

That's the ticket!!

:-))

Bin 'em all, I say!!

**Keith G** · March 16th 06, 05:32 PM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion

"Warm Blue Glow" wrote in message
oups.com...
From: Keith G
Date: Tues, Mar 14 2006 7:11 pm
Email: "Keith G"

Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...

Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...

LOL! We can do this indefinitely...

Not if you are dumb enough to swap your computers over after *binning*
everybody!!

Still, could always bin 'em again!! Double fun!! :-)

**Clyde Slick** · March 15th 06, 11:51 AM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion

"Keith G" wrote in message
news

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
From: Andre Jute
Date: Tues, Mar 14 2006 11:52 am
Email: "Andre Jute"

Let's see who apologizes and who adds abuse to the nauseating
insensitivity and appallingly poor manners they have already displayed
for 10 days and 128 messages

Well, I also posted to the thread when it said that Pinkerton was
unreliable (started by you, it appears).

So if I apologize to you, I must then also apologize to Stewart. Since
he likes and eats haggis, I'm afraid that isn't possible. I've had
haggis and it's disgusting.

I would also point out that you, to be fair, should probably apologize
to Stewart for negatively dragging his name into a thread title, which
could also be called 'insensitive.' Goose, gander, and all.

So, even though I do not pay much attention to thread titles (like most
here, I'd imagine), since I have posted to both threads, and since I
will not apologize to a haggis-eater, I guess that means you'd better
put me in with the trailer park trash. TIA...:-)

Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...

It's a good thing we don't have to use paper.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

**Keith G** · March 16th 06, 05:33 PM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
. ..

"Keith G" wrote in message
news

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in
message oups.com...
From: Andre Jute
Date: Tues, Mar 14 2006 11:52 am
Email: "Andre Jute"

Let's see who apologizes and who adds abuse to the nauseating
insensitivity and appallingly poor manners they have already displayed
for 10 days and 128 messages

Well, I also posted to the thread when it said that Pinkerton was
unreliable (started by you, it appears).

So if I apologize to you, I must then also apologize to Stewart. Since
he likes and eats haggis, I'm afraid that isn't possible. I've had
haggis and it's disgusting.

I would also point out that you, to be fair, should probably apologize
to Stewart for negatively dragging his name into a thread title, which
could also be called 'insensitive.' Goose, gander, and all.

So, even though I do not pay much attention to thread titles (like most
here, I'd imagine), since I have posted to both threads, and since I
will not apologize to a haggis-eater, I guess that means you'd better
put me in with the trailer park trash. TIA...:-)

Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...

It's a good thing we don't have to use paper.

Yecch!! You don't use your bare hands, do you?

**Andre Jute** · March 15th 06, 12:40 AM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
From: Andre Jute
Date: Tues, Mar 14 2006 11:52 am
Email: "Andre Jute"

Let's see who apologizes and who adds abuse to the nauseating
insensitivity and appallingly poor manners they have already displayed
for 10 days and 128 messages

Well, I also posted to the thread when it said that Pinkerton was
unreliable (started by you, it appears).

Absolutely. But that was a reasoned, documented case.

So if I apologize to you, I must then also apologize to Stewart. Since
he likes and eats haggis, I'm afraid that isn't possible. I've had
haggis and it's disgusting.

I would also point out that you, to be fair, should probably apologize
to Stewart for negatively dragging his name into a thread title, which
could also be called 'insensitive.' Goose, gander, and all.

A reasoned, documented, proven case, made by me; I didn't just call
Pinkerton malicious, I *proved* that he is malicious.

The case with you is different. You carelessly contributed to a thread
in which I was accused of being a liar. In fact, the appearance is that
you claimed I lied on classes of liquor about which I never said a word
among other reasons because crap like that will never pass my lips.

So, even though I do not pay much attention to thread titles (like most
here, I'd imagine), since I have posted to both threads, and since I
will not apologize to a haggis-eater, I guess that means you'd better
put me in with the trailer park trash. TIA...:-)

Nah, okay, you're funny, and you're glib (and by all accounts you're
also bloody big) so I'll overlook it this time. Next time, it's your
Grand Cherokee for the chop...

Score still:
Lotuseaters 1, Haggismunchies 19

**Jenn** · March 15th 06, 12:49 AM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion

In article .com,
"Andre Jute" wrote:

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
From: Andre Jute
Date: Tues, Mar 14 2006 11:52 am
Email: "Andre Jute"

Let's see who apologizes and who adds abuse to the nauseating
insensitivity and appallingly poor manners they have already displayed
for 10 days and 128 messages

Well, I also posted to the thread when it said that Pinkerton was
unreliable (started by you, it appears).

Absolutely. But that was a reasoned, documented case.

So if I apologize to you, I must then also apologize to Stewart. Since
he likes and eats haggis, I'm afraid that isn't possible. I've had
haggis and it's disgusting.

I would also point out that you, to be fair, should probably apologize
to Stewart for negatively dragging his name into a thread title, which
could also be called 'insensitive.' Goose, gander, and all.

A reasoned, documented, proven case, made by me; I didn't just call
Pinkerton malicious, I *proved* that he is malicious.

The case with you is different. You carelessly contributed to a thread
in which I was accused of being a liar. snip

You are not thinking logically. You excuse YOUR action where you
ACTUALLY accuse a poster of bad behavior in the title of a post, but
accuse Shhhhh and me of being "insensitive" because we replied to posts
that had NOTHING to do with you at all. Think it though, my friend, and
stop looking foolish.