A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

The extraordinary insensitivity of "audiophiles" on UKRA, RAT and RAO



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old March 15th 06, 08:11 AM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
Fella
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default The extraordinary insensitivity of "audiophiles" on UKRA, RATand RAO

Andre Jute wrote:


Yet on these three conferences we find a thread "WHY ANDREW JUTE MCCOY
IS A LIAR" with 128 message from 29 distinct contributors (1).



You are being reactionary and getting confrontational with "29 distinct
contributors" because of a mere technicality, and a misinterpretation of
that technicality on your part.

All nntp clients put the "" prefix on headers as in "REPLY" which
*can* be interpreted as negating the assertion made in header. As in
"interested" - "disinterested" .. etc.

Case in hand: The header of this thread is "The extraordinary
insensitivity of "audiophiles" on UKRA, RAT and RAO".. By answering a
post in this thread with this header I am not automatically endorsing
the claim that audiophiles in UKRA RAT and RAO have some kind of an
extraordinary insensitivity. On the contrary, unless stated otherwise
within the post, I am giving a *rebuttal* of that assertion made in the
header...

I think it is you who should apoligize from people for exaggerating your
own misconceptions and trolling them about and around in a crosspost
involving THREE different newsgroups...
  #2 (permalink)  
Old March 15th 06, 09:43 AM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default The extraordinary insensitivity of "audiophiles" on UKRA, RAT and RAO


"Fella" wrote in message
...
Andre Jute wrote:


Yet on these three conferences we find a thread "WHY ANDREW JUTE MCCOY
IS A LIAR" with 128 message from 29 distinct contributors (1).



You are being reactionary and getting confrontational with "29 distinct
contributors" because of a mere technicality, and a misinterpretation of
that technicality on your part.

All nntp clients put the "" prefix on headers as in "REPLY" which *can*
be interpreted as negating the assertion made in header. As in
"interested" - "disinterested" .. etc.

Case in hand: The header of this thread is "The extraordinary
insensitivity of "audiophiles" on UKRA, RAT and RAO".. By answering a post
in this thread with this header I am not automatically endorsing the claim
that audiophiles in UKRA RAT and RAO have some kind of an extraordinary
insensitivity. On the contrary, unless stated otherwise within the post, I
am giving a *rebuttal* of that assertion made in the header...

I think it is you who should apoligize from people for exaggerating your
own misconceptions and trolling them about and around in a crosspost
involving THREE different newsgroups...



Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...




  #3 (permalink)  
Old March 15th 06, 11:49 AM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
Clyde Slick
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 59
Default The extraordinary insensitivity of "audiophiles" on UKRA, RAT and RAO


"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"Fella" wrote in message
...
Andre Jute wrote:


Yet on these three conferences we find a thread "WHY ANDREW JUTE MCCOY
IS A LIAR" with 128 message from 29 distinct contributors (1).



You are being reactionary and getting confrontational with "29 distinct
contributors" because of a mere technicality, and a misinterpretation of
that technicality on your part.

All nntp clients put the "" prefix on headers as in "REPLY" which
*can* be interpreted as negating the assertion made in header. As in
"interested" - "disinterested" .. etc.

Case in hand: The header of this thread is "The extraordinary
insensitivity of "audiophiles" on UKRA, RAT and RAO".. By answering a
post in this thread with this header I am not automatically endorsing the
claim that audiophiles in UKRA RAT and RAO have some kind of an
extraordinary insensitivity. On the contrary, unless stated otherwise
within the post, I am giving a *rebuttal* of that assertion made in the
header...

I think it is you who should apoligize from people for exaggerating your
own misconceptions and trolling them about and around in a crosspost
involving THREE different newsgroups...



Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...

removed?

I still see it



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.