![]() |
YOU MUST KNOW THIS MAN
In article , Glenn Richards wrote:
if you believe in him you will be telling us you can hear speaker cables differences lol Actually, a lot of agnostics and atheists can hear speaker cable differences. There's no hocus-pocus involved, just some science that the sceptics disregard. It *would* be science if it was the result of experiments or observations conducted and documented according to the scientific method. Simple declarations of somebody's opinions, or of what they claim to be able to hear, don't count, unless there is some unbiassed and verifiable evidence in support of them. So, you can send a sine wave down a bit of cable and it'll come out the other end as exactly the same sine wave. Guess what? Music isn't a sine wave. Quite so, but it can be analysed as lots of sine waves superimposed, and they will have various amplitudes and phase angles relative to each other. And it is possible to devise test signals and measurement methods that will show when any of these properties would be significantly altered within any range of frequencies and amplitudes in which we may be interested. And that *is* science. Rod. |
YOU MUST KNOW THIS MAN
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 23:54:06 +0100, Glenn Richards
wrote: Dave xxxx wrote: if you believe in him you will be telling us you can hear speaker cables differences lol Actually, a lot of agnostics and atheists can hear speaker cable differences. Actually no they can't, they just *believe* that they can - hence the comment. There's no hocus-pocus involved, just some science that the sceptics disregard. No, skeptics do *not* disregard science, but chicken**** clowns like you carefully avoid scientifically *proving* your wildass claims about cable sound. So, you can send a sine wave down a bit of cable and it'll come out the other end as exactly the same sine wave. Guess what? Music isn't a sine wave. It can however be represented as a superposition of many sine waves. BTW, flute and organ music pretty much *is* sine waves. As for blind or double-blind testing, well, the sceptics will already have made up their mind that there's no difference, so their minds will tell them there is none. It's like the Creationist fundies who would refuse to believe in evolution even if God himself appeared before them and told them it was true. Not the point. The point is that in a blind test, *you* can't tell the difference, and that's why you're avoiding it like the plague. And just trying to get this vaguely back on-topic (I'm reading in uk.rec.audio atm) I seem to have acquired a pair of Chord Rumour 4 speaker cables today, at no cost to myself. Been trying them out with some interesting results. Bull****. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
YOU MUST KNOW THIS MAN
Glenn Richards wrote: Dave xxxx wrote: if you believe in him you will be telling us you can hear speaker cables differences lol Actually, a lot of agnostics and atheists can hear speaker cable differences. There's no hocus-pocus involved, just some science that the sceptics disregard. So, you can send a sine wave down a bit of cable and it'll come out the other end as exactly the same sine wave. Guess what? Music isn't a sine wave. All sound can be treated as though it is composed of sine waves. As for blind or double-blind testing, well, the sceptics will already have made up their mind that there's no difference, so their minds will And the non-sceptics refuse to submit themselves to it because they know what the result will be. tell them there is none. It's like the Creationist fundies who would refuse to believe in evolution even if God himself appeared before them and told them it was true. And just trying to get this vaguely back on-topic (I'm reading in uk.rec.audio atm) I seem to have acquired a pair of Chord Rumour 4 speaker cables today, at no cost to myself. Been trying them out with some interesting results. Good for you. MBQ |
YOU MUST KNOW THIS MAN
In article ,
Dave xxxx wrote: MUHAMMAD (May peace and blessings of God Almighty be upon him) You may be an atheist or an agnostic; or you may belong to anyone of the religious denominations that exist in the world today. You may be if you believe in him you will be telling us you can hear speaker cables differences lol Stereo for you. -- Member - Liberal International This is Ici God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! Canada's New CONservatives - Same old Tory. |
YOU MUST KNOW THIS MAN
In article ,
Glenn Richards wrote: Dave xxxx wrote: if you believe in him you will be telling us you can hear speaker cables differences lol Actually, a lot of agnostics and atheists can hear speaker cable differences. There's no hocus-pocus involved, just some science that the sceptics disregard. So, you can send a sine wave down a bit of cable and it'll come out the other end as exactly the same sine wave. Guess what? Music isn't a sine wave. As for blind or double-blind testing, well, the sceptics will already have made up their mind that there's no difference, so their minds will tell them there is none. It's like the Creationist fundies who would refuse to believe in evolution even if God himself appeared before them and told them it was true. And just trying to get this vaguely back on-topic (I'm reading in uk.rec.audio atm) I seem to have acquired a pair of Chord Rumour 4 speaker cables today, at no cost to myself. Been trying them out with some interesting results. Anyone has a copy of Planet of the Spiders? -- Member - Liberal International This is Ici God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! Canada's New CONservatives - Same old Tory. |
YOU MUST KNOW THIS MAN
In article ,
Stewart Pinkerton wrote: On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 23:13:02 GMT, (H. Neary) wrote: On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 23:48:38 +0100, Glenn Richards wrote: Christopher A. Lee wrote: IF NOT, WHY ARE YOU RUBBING THIS STUPIDITY IN OUR FACES? Because for some reason the phrase "live and let live" does not exist in the minds of most religious zealots. Incidentally, I had to appear in court today as a witness. I was asked if I would rather swear on the book of lies or just swear a non-denominational affirmation. I said that as a committed atheist I'd better take the latter, as the former would be meaningless. Academic really! They will believe what they wish to. Your faith or lack of it is immaterial. Make the most of an oath in court. Draw blood. Drag a few Krishna,s and Mormons into the proceedings and when you have everything settled explain that you have seen the light and converted to Jedi. But not until May the Fourth be with you......... -- Sounds like deadly force. -- Member - Liberal International This is Ici God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! Canada's New CONservatives - Same old Tory. |
YOU MUST KNOW THIS MAN
|
YOU MUST KNOW THIS MAN
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:55:34 +0100, Nick Gorham
wrote: wrote: Glenn Richards wrote: Dave xxxx wrote: if you believe in him you will be telling us you can hear speaker cables differences lol Actually, a lot of agnostics and atheists can hear speaker cable differences. There's no hocus-pocus involved, just some science that the sceptics disregard. So, you can send a sine wave down a bit of cable and it'll come out the other end as exactly the same sine wave. Guess what? Music isn't a sine wave. All sound can be treated as though it is composed of sine waves. All sound can be treated as if its composed of putty, but that still doesn't mean that it is. Dealing with waves only in the frequency domain does mean you have lost temperal (phase) information. And how exactly do you think that a cable might screw this up? And do bear in mind that the speaker itself subsequently does a heroic job of doing exactly that. d Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
YOU MUST KNOW THIS MAN
Don Pearce wrote:
All sound can be treated as though it is composed of sine waves. All sound can be treated as if its composed of putty, but that still doesn't mean that it is. Dealing with waves only in the frequency domain does mean you have lost temperal (phase) information. And how exactly do you think that a cable might screw this up? And do bear in mind that the speaker itself subsequently does a heroic job of doing exactly that. d Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com And what exactly makes you think I was suggesting it would, Don't assume what side of the fence I am on this one. I was just replying to the assumption that a FFT gives you ALL the information about a signal, and the deeper assumption that just because a model is useful, then the model is equivalent to the reality. -- Nick |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk