On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 22:02:16 +0200, Lionel
lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr wrote:

dave weil a écrit :
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 18:34:58 GMT, (Stewart
Pinkerton) wrote:


On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:43:03 -0500, dave weil
wrote:


On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 06:47:16 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


Ironically, SETs were virtually unknown as hifi amplifiers at the time.

Maybe to *your* crew.

To *everyone*, you ignorant troll. Find me *one* supposedly 'hi fi'
SET amp from before 1980.

Try looking in Japan.

If you can see that far...

You are right Dave, Sansui has manufactured good amplifiers at this time.

Not SETs.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:02:27 -0400, "Sockpuppet Yustabe"
wrote:

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
Of course, *all* amplifiers *measure* differently - but what does that
matter? Naturally, the 'Golden-Eared Subjectivists' will all *claim*
that they are 'night and day', as you have implied above, but it ain't
necessarily so.


Right, it ain't necessarily so. But it could be so.

Indeed yes, with similar probability to the Moon being made from green
cheese........
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:02:27 -0400, "Sockpuppet Yustabe"
wrote:

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
Of course, *all* amplifiers *measure* differently - but what does that
matter? Naturally, the 'Golden-Eared Subjectivists' will all *claim*
that they are 'night and day', as you have implied above, but it ain't
necessarily so.


Right, it ain't necessarily so. But it could be so.

Indeed yes, with similar probability to the Moon being made from green
cheese........
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 22:02:16 +0200, Lionel
lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr wrote:


dave weil a écrit :

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 18:34:58 GMT, (Stewart
Pinkerton) wrote:



On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:43:03 -0500, dave weil
wrote:



On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 06:47:16 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:



Ironically, SETs were virtually unknown as hifi amplifiers at the time.

Maybe to *your* crew.

To *everyone*, you ignorant troll. Find me *one* supposedly 'hi fi'
SET amp from before 1980.


Try looking in Japan.

If you can see that far...

You are right Dave, Sansui has manufactured good amplifiers at this time.


Not SETs.

Ooops !

Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 22:02:16 +0200, Lionel
lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr wrote:


dave weil a écrit :

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 18:34:58 GMT, (Stewart
Pinkerton) wrote:



On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:43:03 -0500, dave weil
wrote:



On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 06:47:16 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:



Ironically, SETs were virtually unknown as hifi amplifiers at the time.

Maybe to *your* crew.

To *everyone*, you ignorant troll. Find me *one* supposedly 'hi fi'
SET amp from before 1980.


Try looking in Japan.

If you can see that far...

You are right Dave, Sansui has manufactured good amplifiers at this time.


Not SETs.

Ooops !

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:02:27 -0400, "Sockpuppet Yustabe"
wrote:

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
Of course, *all* amplifiers *measure* differently - but what does that
matter? Naturally, the 'Golden-Eared Subjectivists' will all *claim*
that they are 'night and day', as you have implied above, but it ain't
necessarily so.


Right, it ain't necessarily so. But it could be so.

Indeed yes, with similar probability to the Moon being made from green
cheese........
--


In your case, with your ears, probably so.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:02:27 -0400, "Sockpuppet Yustabe"
wrote:

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
Of course, *all* amplifiers *measure* differently - but what does that
matter? Naturally, the 'Golden-Eared Subjectivists' will all *claim*
that they are 'night and day', as you have implied above, but it ain't
necessarily so.


Right, it ain't necessarily so. But it could be so.

Indeed yes, with similar probability to the Moon being made from green
cheese........
--


In your case, with your ears, probably so.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 06:47:11 GMT, (Stewart
Pinkerton) wrote:

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 14:20:59 -0500, dave weil
wrote:

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 18:34:50 GMT, (Stewart
Pinkerton) wrote:

BTW, where is the evidence that it was poorly constructed? As ever
Vile, you're just a brain-dead troll.

Tell me, if it *were* a 'classic push-pull design" "properly
constructed", wouldn't it have sounded the SAME as the other amp?

Possibly, but tube amps tend also to have problems with microphony and
noise. The '62 Corvette is also a 'classic design', but that doesn't
mean that it has decent performance!

Now you're qualifying and you know that this is mere sophistry.

Isn't that what you claim? You say that an SET would sound the same,
right?

Oooops, looks like you blew a fuse there, Stewie.

typical Vile sophistry. I said that I could put up *a* SET amp that
would sound the same as a SS amp, I did not say that *most* SET amps
could achieve this.

Fair enough.

On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 06:47:11 GMT, (Stewart
Pinkerton) wrote:

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 14:20:59 -0500, dave weil
wrote:

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 18:34:50 GMT, (Stewart
Pinkerton) wrote:

BTW, where is the evidence that it was poorly constructed? As ever
Vile, you're just a brain-dead troll.

Tell me, if it *were* a 'classic push-pull design" "properly
constructed", wouldn't it have sounded the SAME as the other amp?

Possibly, but tube amps tend also to have problems with microphony and
noise. The '62 Corvette is also a 'classic design', but that doesn't
mean that it has decent performance!

Now you're qualifying and you know that this is mere sophistry.

Isn't that what you claim? You say that an SET would sound the same,
right?

Oooops, looks like you blew a fuse there, Stewie.

typical Vile sophistry. I said that I could put up *a* SET amp that
would sound the same as a SS amp, I did not say that *most* SET amps
could achieve this.

Fair enough.

On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 06:47:13 GMT, (Stewart
Pinkerton) wrote:

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 22:02:16 +0200, Lionel
lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr wrote:

dave weil a écrit :
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 18:34:58 GMT, (Stewart
Pinkerton) wrote:


On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:43:03 -0500, dave weil
wrote:


On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 06:47:16 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


Ironically, SETs were virtually unknown as hifi amplifiers at the time.

Maybe to *your* crew.

To *everyone*, you ignorant troll. Find me *one* supposedly 'hi fi'
SET amp from before 1980.

Try looking in Japan.

If you can see that far...

You are right Dave, Sansui has manufactured good amplifiers at this time.

Not SETs.

Ummmm Stewart, couldn't you read the sarcasm? Didn't it translate?