On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 16:16:29 GMT, "Parker"
wrote:

Would you mind not telling me or others what they should or shouldn't do, or
write here in this public debate?
Are you not tired (and some others here) of restricting to just a few ones
the conditions of every aspect in life, in order to pretend you are acting
scientifically?
Stop lying to yourself.
The man did define slam; with ironic terms you said it was b.s. and
subjective misconception. Very rude in disguise.
According to your rather instantaneous judgement I acted with rudeness and
that is a subjective impression of yours. Who gave you the power to decide
which subjective perceptions are based on real facts and which are not?
Perhaps you have a definition of rudeness somewhere.
Slam: what the O.P. defined in nice and clear terms. As a human subjective
construction based on natural facts it is specially noticeable when in two
given music reproduction equipments or rooms, one of them gives it (as
defined by the O.P.) and the other not.


Parker, you are entirely clueless - and still rude. Thank you for this
piece of slimy patronisation. It is just a shame that it is entirely
without any basis in fact.

Goodbye

d

_____________________________

http://www.pearce.uk.com