![]() |
Advice needed - Looking for software to batch level adjust MP3 files
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:05:17 GMT, "dadiOH"
wrote: No, not necessarily *sound* as loud just increase the values in the softer songs until the greatest is equal to the greatest in the loudest song. For example... Loud song greatest value = 29000 Song to be changed, greatest value = 24,500 (29000)-(24500) = 4500. Therefore, all values in this song are to be increased by 4500 when played. Which won't make it sound as loud as the compressed song. |
Advice needed - Looking for software to batch level adjust MP3 files
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:19:24 -0400, NRen2k5 wrote:
Unfortunately that volume reduction is probably achieved digitally by just throwing away bits, which is a bad thing. It doesn't throw away bits. What it does is it changes "global gain" values. Doing so is totally lossless and reversible. But, while it is happening, the system is throwing away bits. Anyway do you WANT everything reduced to the level of the quietest? You then have to apply more amplification, bringing noise levels up. So? You don't see that as undesirable? And you don't have to reduce them to the level of the quietest. What you can do is apply "track gain" so that all the songs are a certain volume, for example 89dB, and then use "constant gain" to bring the volume of every song up or down by the same amount. I had a look, and I can't see how the device works without modifying dynamic range - but even if it works by lowering... you have another valid 'yuk' point. MP3Gain doesn't touch dynamic range. Of course it does. The noise floor of the playback system isn't going to go away. Reducing signal level will bring peaks nearer to the noise floor, i.e. reduce dynamic range. |
Advice needed - Looking for software to batch level adjust MP3 files
Laurence Payne lpayne1NOSPAM@dslDOTpipexDOTcom wrote:
MP3Gain doesn't touch dynamic range. Of course it does. The noise floor of the playback system isn't going to go away. Reducing signal level will bring peaks nearer to the noise floor, i.e. reduce dynamic range. Yes, but it's adjusting the level right before the converters, not earlier in the chain. So your only worry is the noise floor of the converters themselves. And frankly, this being MP3, you have far more serious things to worry about than that. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Advice needed - Looking for software to batch level adjust MP3 files
Eeyore wrote:
Kludge writes: The thing is, that field is ALWAYS maxed out whenever anyone hands you an MP3, because all the encoders want their products to play back as loudly as possible. So you can usually turn it down, but seldom can you turn it up. That's interesting Scott. Is there a handy application to edit the header ? The MP3Gain application that started out this horrible thread will allow you to adjust that field. I don't know an easy way to edit the other header info although of course there are always binary editing tools like git and emacs to allow you to do it by hand. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Advice needed - Looking for software to batch level adjust MP3 files
Don Pearce wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:05:17 GMT, "dadiOH" wrote: Don Pearce wrote: On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:10:55 GMT, "dadiOH" wrote: David Morgan (MAMS) wrote: I had a look, and I can't see how the device works without modifying dynamic range Simply put... 1. Find max volume among all songs 2. "Turn up the volume" in all others so their max is the same as the loudest. Won't work - can't work. If you have a mixture of music, then peak levels as related to average loudness will vary wildly. The loudest sounding will have highly compressed dynamics, with most of the tune crammed against the limit. If you try to increase the levels of all the others until they sound as loud, they will all be clipped to hell. No, not necessarily *sound* as loud just increase the values in the softer songs until the greatest is equal to the greatest in the loudest song. For example... Loud song greatest value = 29000 Song to be changed, greatest value = 24,500 (29000)-(24500) = 4500. Therefore, all values in this song are to be increased by 4500 when played. But what does that do? They are just numbers, and they have only the most tangential relationship to the perceived playing of the track - which is what this is all about. The playing of the track involves (after decoding to wave) interpretation of numbers - that's all a file is - in a meaningful way to produce the desired sound; in this case, sound. What the numbers do in this case is to tell the player to increase the volume of each sound by a specific amount. ______________ Incidentally the maths is all off too. You can't do this by adding numbers, you have to multiply. No, one can certainly do binary addition. Things may have changed but in the not too distant past there were no op codes for multiplication. Doesn't matter one way or the other because multiplication is nothing more than repetitive addition. -- dadiOH ____________________________ dadiOH's dandies v3.06... ....a help file of info about MP3s, recording from LP/cassette and tips & tricks on this and that. Get it at http://mysite.verizon.net/xico |
Advice needed - Looking for software to batch level adjust MP3 files
Laurence Payne wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:05:17 GMT, "dadiOH" wrote: No, not necessarily *sound* as loud just increase the values in the softer songs until the greatest is equal to the greatest in the loudest song. For example... Loud song greatest value = 29000 Song to be changed, greatest value = 24,500 (29000)-(24500) = 4500. Therefore, all values in this song are to be increased by 4500 when played. Which won't make it sound as loud as the compressed song. Did you read this part?... No, not necessarily *sound* as loud just increase the values in the softer songs until the greatest is equal to the greatest in the loudest song. For example... -- dadiOH ____________________________ dadiOH's dandies v3.06... ....a help file of info about MP3s, recording from LP/cassette and tips & tricks on this and that. Get it at http://mysite.verizon.net/xico |
Advice needed - Looking for software to batch level adjust MP3files
David Morgan (MAMS) wrote:
"NRen2k5" wrote in message ... Scott Dorsey wrote: The thing is, that field is ALWAYS maxed out whenever anyone hands you an MP3, because all the encoders want their products to play back as loudly as possible. So you can usually turn it down, but seldom can you turn it up. No. It's the music industry that wants their *songs* to play as loudly as possible, so they use dynamic compression to be able to make them as loud as possible on CD. You would never *want* to turn *up* the gain on these files, since it will make the already-existing clipping even worse, but you can do it. Thus altering dynamic range even further, or living with massive distortion, the latter of which I'd hope most products would not consider as an option. No, dynamic range is not altered at all. The massive distortion can be undone. MP3 doesn't really have a noise ceiling or floor like PCM does. The signal peaks don't actually get clipped in the MP3 itself... just in the playback. So this "clipping" distortion can be fixed by just reducing the gain of the MP3. -- http://theunfunnytruth.ytmnd.com/ http://theunfunnysequel.ytmnd.com/ http://pcguyelevated.ytmnd.com/ http://lolpilotse.ytmnd.com/ |
Advice needed - Looking for software to batch level adjust MP3 files
"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message ... Back in the LP days, it was all manual, and you had to put "PLAY THIS RECORD AS LOUD AS POSSIBLE" in the liner notes. ???? LP's used compression the same as most CD's. In fact the need for compression was greater because of the limited dynamic range. Just because mastering engineers have lost their way these days is irrelevant to the technical necessities. Not only that, but with LP you *could* push the peak cutting levels higher than RIAA recommendations as well. It's *impossible* to push peak CD levels higher than Dfs though. MrT. |
Advice needed - Looking for software to batch level adjust MP3 files
"Mr.T" MrT@home wrote in message ... "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message ... Back in the LP days, it was all manual, and you had to put "PLAY THIS RECORD AS LOUD AS POSSIBLE" in the liner notes. ???? LP's used compression the same as most CD's. In fact the need for compression was greater because of the limited dynamic range. Just because mastering engineers have lost their way these days is irrelevant to the technical necessities. Not only that, but with LP you *could* push the peak cutting levels higher than RIAA recommendations as well. It's *impossible* to push peak CD levels higher than Dfs though. MrT. Careful, Mr. T.... you're preaching to the only guy on the r.a.p. who is still making LP record masters in his basement. ;-) |
Advice needed - Looking for software to batch level adjust MP3 files
David Morgan (MAMS) wrote:
if gain is increased (especially on material where peaks are likely already near FS) limiting will have to come into play, altering dynamics. True, if we accept that everything will have peaks at or near full scale. Much to my surprise, there are some older tracks in my collection that do NOT hit full scale, even on peaks. Part of that whole dated concept of "albums" where dynamic expression extended from track to track. -- "It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!" - Lorin David Schultz in the control room making even bad news sound good (Remove spamblock to reply) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk