No, just rebutting the usual BS from the ignorant and misguided who
actually think that the vinyl format has any unique inherent SQ
advantages.


Wouldn't know and don't care...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you had an interest in fidelity you would want to know and you would
care!
------------------------------------------------------------------------

...I play it only for the *sound*....

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bingo!!!!!
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consider this - 50s Jazz and 60s Rock on anything *other* than vinyl....??


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Am I correct in thinking that 40s and 60s Jazz, 50s and 70s Rock etc is ok
on CD et al?
What was the change in those two decades (and only to those two genres I
presume) that made the difference?
Out of curiosity, do you know why 'they' found the need to revert or change
again?
Can you explain why those genres of music created in other decades fair less
well on vinyl?
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Ludicrous prospect, isn't it! ;-)


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, I must say that it is not the prospect that I find ludicrous
You certainly do have the gift for making people laugh (well me at any rate)
but, in all seriousness, I for one would like your explanation.
I am always willing to learn from an authoritative source such as yourself


Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Paul" wrote in message
...

No, just rebutting the usual BS from the ignorant and misguided who
actually think that the vinyl format has any unique inherent SQ
advantages.


Wouldn't know and don't care...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you had an interest in fidelity you would want to know and you would
care!
------------------------------------------------------------------------

...I play it only for the *sound*....

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bingo!!!!!
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consider this - 50s Jazz and 60s Rock on anything *other* than
vinyl....??


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Am I correct in thinking that 40s and 60s Jazz, 50s and 70s Rock etc is ok
on CD et al?
What was the change in those two decades (and only to those two genres I
presume) that made the difference?
Out of curiosity, do you know why 'they' found the need to revert or
change again?
Can you explain why those genres of music created in other decades fair
less well on vinyl?
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Ludicrous prospect, isn't it! ;-)


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, I must say that it is not the prospect that I find ludicrous
You certainly do have the gift for making people laugh (well me at any
rate) but, in all seriousness, I for one would like your explanation.
I am always willing to learn from an authoritative source such as yourself


Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------




Hey!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fidelity Man (aka I'm 'Gone' :-))
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lose
------------------------------------------------------------------------
the
------------------------------------------------------------------------
****ing
------------------------------------------------------------------------
stoopid
------------------------------------------------------------------------
lines
------------------------------------------------------------------------
if
------------------------------------------------------------------------
you
------------------------------------------------------------------------
want
------------------------------------------------------------------------
to
------------------------------------------------------------------------
talk
------------------------------------------------------------------------
to
------------------------------------------------------------------------
me!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Otherwise
------------------------------------------------------------------------
you're
------------------------------------------------------------------------
headed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
for
------------------------------------------------------------------------
the
------------------------------------------------------------------------
****ter
------------------------------------------------------------------------
under
------------------------------------------------------------------------
the
------------------------------------------------------------------------
'General ****: Not Worth The Bother'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
clause...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
OK?

"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"Paul" wrote in message
...

No, just rebutting the usual BS from the ignorant and misguided who
actually think that the vinyl format has any unique inherent SQ
advantages.


Wouldn't know and don't care...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you had an interest in fidelity you would want to know and you would
care!
------------------------------------------------------------------------

...I play it only for the *sound*....

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bingo!!!!!
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consider this - 50s Jazz and 60s Rock on anything *other* than
vinyl....??


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Am I correct in thinking that 40s and 60s Jazz, 50s and 70s Rock etc is
ok
on CD et al?
What was the change in those two decades (and only to those two genres I
presume) that made the difference?
Out of curiosity, do you know why 'they' found the need to revert or
change again?
Can you explain why those genres of music created in other decades fair
less well on vinyl?
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Ludicrous prospect, isn't it! ;-)


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, I must say that it is not the prospect that I find ludicrous
You certainly do have the gift for making people laugh (well me at any
rate) but, in all seriousness, I for one would like your explanation.
I am always willing to learn from an authoritative source such as
yourself


Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------




Hey!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fidelity Man (aka I'm 'Gone' :-))
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lose
------------------------------------------------------------------------
the
------------------------------------------------------------------------
****ing
------------------------------------------------------------------------
stoopid
------------------------------------------------------------------------
lines
------------------------------------------------------------------------
if
------------------------------------------------------------------------
you
------------------------------------------------------------------------
want
------------------------------------------------------------------------
to
------------------------------------------------------------------------
talk
------------------------------------------------------------------------
to
------------------------------------------------------------------------
me!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Otherwise
------------------------------------------------------------------------
you're
------------------------------------------------------------------------
headed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
for
------------------------------------------------------------------------
the
------------------------------------------------------------------------
****ter
------------------------------------------------------------------------
under
------------------------------------------------------------------------
the
------------------------------------------------------------------------
'General ****: Not Worth The Bother'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
clause...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
OK?





Way to go Keith!!! Rather fractious aren't you
'Fidelity Man' - I rather like that! Who could possibly stay away when
you're on stage?
So that's the explanation is it! Can't say I understand it though.
Joking apart, you are either a 'village idiot' or, for reason or reasons
best know to yourself, wish to masquerade as one.
Have you nothing constructive or pertinent to say? Do you have an
explanation?
Certainly you're response would indicate that you don't. All the hallmarks
of a beaten man I'd say. Inevitable really - did you honestly believe you
could make such crass statements and hope to get away with it? Now tell me,
aren't you feeling just a little foolish right now?
Redemption is just a keyboard away - type something relevant and meaningful.

Look Keith, no lines - I won't take no response for an answer

Paul

Sockpuppet "Paul" dropped his cock for a moment and
wrote:


Look Keith, no lines - I won't take no response for an answer


OK sonny, stand by and I'll get back to you later. I got a few chores to do
right now.....

Make that *might* get back to you later - I'm not sure you've typed anything
yet worth reading, let alone replying to....

Meanwhile go check your *Fidelity* or better yet, perhaps you could list the
kit you use, while you are waiting - to give me some idea of how much of a
yappy little **** you are..???

Sockpuppet "Paul" dropped his cock for a moment and
wrote:


Yawn Not quite what I had hoped for but pretty much what I had expected.

OK sonny, stand by and I'll get back to you later. I got a few chores to
do right now.....


I guess one of your chores is dig a deeper hole? Absolutely no rush Keith
(although see below.)

Make that *might* get back to you later - I'm not sure you've typed
anything yet worth reading, let alone replying to....


Not sure? Need more time?
Let me remove a little embarrassment (and your shovel). Can I ask that you
don't bother? I cannot see any evidence in *any* of your posts that you have
anything constructive or pertinent to say. (I welcome constructive criticism
too you know.) You have not once addressed anything I've written - correct?
I doubt that will change so it would be nothing more than a waste of my
time.

...perhaps you could list the kit you use, ...

Nope. I am not about to allow you refuge there oh master of the smoke
screen! Besides, I've given you a get out above - which I hope you will
take.
If you have indeed read any of my posts (and understood even just a little)
you should be aware that I *am* critical of my own system(s) - all systems!
I have no need of your input.

Over and out?

Paul.

"Paul" grabbed his cock again and typed with one hand:


Yawn Not quite what I had hoped for but pretty much what I had
expected.


Yes, with your abrasive and abusive manner, I'm not surprised you expect
that sort of thing - you must be pretty used to it...



Make that *might* get back to you later - I'm not sure you've typed
anything yet worth reading, let alone replying to....


Not sure? Need more time?


Nope...



...perhaps you could list the kit you use, ...

Nope.


Now, why am I *so* not surprised?

Another *all mouth and no trousers* blow-in with enough yap to silence the
Tokyo Stock Exchange (and not much else)....

Most (not all) of my stuff is he

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/


Some of us ain't too scared to show what we got *whatever* clowns like you
might think of it....



If you have indeed read any of my posts


No, I haven't really - a glimpse of the earliest ones was enough...


Over and out?


Blew in, blew up, blew out and blew over....

In article ,
Paul wrote:
Sockpuppet "Paul" dropped his cock for a moment
and wrote:


Yawn Not quite what I had hoped for but pretty much what I had
expected.

Mr G seems to have a fascination with the male member at the moment.
Perhaps that fits in with his horn fetish.

--
*The only difference between a rut and a grave is the depth.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Paul wrote:
Sockpuppet "Paul" dropped his cock for a moment
and wrote:


Yawn Not quite what I had hoped for but pretty much what I had
expected.

Mr G seems to have a fascination with the male member at the moment.
Perhaps that fits in with his horn fetish.



One thing's a *given* in here - mention the word 'cock' and Plowie comes
a'runnin'...!!

:-))