A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Damned remasters...



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9 (permalink)  
Old December 10th 06, 11:34 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Don Pearce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,822
Default Damned remasters...

On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:12:22 +0000 (GMT), Jim Lesurf
wrote:

In article ,
Glenn Richards wrote:
Don Pearce wrote:


It actually looks like the original CD was mastered with more level
compression than the vinyl - which is here. Very odd - may be just
the way the different DAW programmes present the horizontal scale
that causes this, though.


Looks like it's just displayed differently. The spikes at the beginning
of the track hit almost full scale, just like on the CD.


FWIW When I was doing some analysis of CD tracks I tried various ways to
produce statistics for the dynamics. I came to the conclusion that the most
revealing method was to avoid 'rms' or 'mean' powers. The problem being
that these could easily fail to indicate brief peaks which might reach
0dBFS.

I therefore used the method of breaking the track into 100 millsecond
chunks, finding the peak sample magnitudes (left and right) in each chunk,
then doing the statistics on the resulting series of peak values. This
makes it much easier to spot excessive compression leading to clipping.

The programs I used only run under RO, not Mac or Windows. But Keith Howard
of HFN has done a Windows version which should appear on his
audiosignal.co.uk website in due course.

Article on this in the current (cover dated December) issue of HFN. Note
that the comment at the end of the article regarding the programs is
incorrect!

Slainte,

Jim


Jim, Adobe Audition does its stats in a way that appears to be
somewhat similar, although the default window is 50mS rather than 100.
The output data looks like this:

http://81.174.169.10/odds/stats.gif

And a power histogram like this:

http://81.174.169.10/odds/hist.gif

I don't know what the internal maths is like, but I'm sure I could
make a pretty good guess. Would that be the kind of thing you get from
your programme?

d

--
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.