
December 30th 06, 05:06 PM
posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
|
|
Can this ignoramus really be an engineer?
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 10:27:47 -0500, "liquidator"
wrote:
"Don Pearce" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:12:57 -0500, "liquidator"
wrote:
And the fact that he makes grammatic errors only reinforces he's an
engineer.
Pot/kettle?
"grammatic" should be "grammatical"
"only reinforces he's" should be "only reinforces the supposition that
he's"
d
--
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
Nope. Look it up.
The word "grammatic" isn't even in Merriam-Webster online. In
Dictionary Online it is given the meaning "of or pertaining to
grammar", which is not the usage we had here, which was of the correct
use of grammar - the word for which is grammatical.
The OED has no entry for grammatic.
d
--
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
|

December 30th 06, 05:36 PM
posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
|
|
Can this ignoramus really be an engineer?
Don Pearce wrote:
The word "grammatic" isn't even in Merriam-Webster online. In
Dictionary Online it is given the meaning "of or pertaining to
grammar", which is not the usage we had here, which was of the correct
use of grammar - the word for which is grammatical.
The OED has no entry for grammatic.
Mine does, and that's just the Shorter OED.
When I'm feeling really pedantic I cycle seven miles to the public
library to consult the full 24 volume edition.
--
Eiron.
|

December 30th 06, 05:45 PM
posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
|
|
Can this ignoramus really be an engineer?
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:36:20 +0000, Eiron wrote:
Don Pearce wrote:
The word "grammatic" isn't even in Merriam-Webster online. In
Dictionary Online it is given the meaning "of or pertaining to
grammar", which is not the usage we had here, which was of the correct
use of grammar - the word for which is grammatical.
The OED has no entry for grammatic.
Mine does, and that's just the Shorter OED.
When I'm feeling really pedantic I cycle seven miles to the public
library to consult the full 24 volume edition.
Quite so. But grammatic and grammatical mean two quite different
things. You can talk about the grammatic structure of a sentence, but
if you are discussing the correctness of that structure, the word is
grammatical.
d
--
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
|

December 30th 06, 05:59 PM
posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
|
|
Can this ignoramus really be an engineer?
Don Pearce wrote:
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:36:20 +0000, Eiron wrote:
Don Pearce wrote:
The word "grammatic" isn't even in Merriam-Webster online. In
Dictionary Online it is given the meaning "of or pertaining to
grammar", which is not the usage we had here, which was of the correct
use of grammar - the word for which is grammatical.
The OED has no entry for grammatic.
Mine does, and that's just the Shorter OED.
When I'm feeling really pedantic I cycle seven miles to the public
library to consult the full 24 volume edition.
Quite so. But grammatic and grammatical mean two quite different
things. You can talk about the grammatic structure of a sentence, but
if you are discussing the correctness of that structure, the word is
grammatical.
Americans often have trouble with different meanings. See alternate and
alternative for example.
Graham
|

December 30th 06, 06:12 PM
posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
|
|
Can this ignoramus really be an engineer?
Poopie said:
Americans often have trouble with different meanings. See alternate and
alternative for example.
Brits often have trouble staying sober past 3 p.m. See the Rose & Crown,
the Otter & Bump, the Dirk & Dragon, the Coot & Kipper, etc., etc., etc.
--
Lionella loves the Krooborg from afar. With mud on top.
|

December 30th 06, 06:12 PM
posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
|
|
Can this ignoramus really be an engineer?
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:59:01 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:
Don Pearce wrote:
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:36:20 +0000, Eiron wrote:
Don Pearce wrote:
The word "grammatic" isn't even in Merriam-Webster online. In
Dictionary Online it is given the meaning "of or pertaining to
grammar", which is not the usage we had here, which was of the correct
use of grammar - the word for which is grammatical.
The OED has no entry for grammatic.
Mine does, and that's just the Shorter OED.
When I'm feeling really pedantic I cycle seven miles to the public
library to consult the full 24 volume edition.
Quite so. But grammatic and grammatical mean two quite different
things. You can talk about the grammatic structure of a sentence, but
if you are discussing the correctness of that structure, the word is
grammatical.
Americans often have trouble with different meanings. See alternate and
alternative for example.
Graham
Momentarily and soon seem to give them trouble too. And of course
American English is now a language essentially without adverbs.
d
--
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
|

December 30th 06, 06:17 PM
posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
|
|
Can this ignoramus really be an engineer?
In article ,
(Don Pearce) wrote:
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:59:01 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:
Don Pearce wrote:
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:36:20 +0000, Eiron wrote:
Don Pearce wrote:
The word "grammatic" isn't even in Merriam-Webster online. In
Dictionary Online it is given the meaning "of or pertaining to
grammar", which is not the usage we had here, which was of the correct
use of grammar - the word for which is grammatical.
The OED has no entry for grammatic.
Mine does, and that's just the Shorter OED.
When I'm feeling really pedantic I cycle seven miles to the public
library to consult the full 24 volume edition.
Quite so. But grammatic and grammatical mean two quite different
things. You can talk about the grammatic structure of a sentence, but
if you are discussing the correctness of that structure, the word is
grammatical.
Americans often have trouble with different meanings. See alternate and
alternative for example.
Graham
Momentarily and soon seem to give them trouble too. And of course
American English is now a language essentially without adverbs.
d
You speak truthfully.
|

December 30th 06, 11:48 PM
posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
|
|
Can this ignoramus really be an engineer?
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:17:00 GMT, Jenn
wrote:
You speak truthfully.
Also...he speaks the truth.
|

December 31st 06, 03:29 AM
posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
|
|
Can this ignoramus Graham "Poopie" Stevenson really be an engineer?
Jenn wrote:
In article ,
(Don Pearce) wrote:
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:59:01 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:
Don Pearce wrote:
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:36:20 +0000, Eiron wrote:
Don Pearce wrote:
The word "grammatic" isn't even in Merriam-Webster online. In
Dictionary Online it is given the meaning "of or pertaining to
grammar", which is not the usage we had here, which was of the correct
use of grammar - the word for which is grammatical.
The OED has no entry for grammatic.
Mine does, and that's just the Shorter OED.
When I'm feeling really pedantic I cycle seven miles to the public
library to consult the full 24 volume edition.
Quite so. But grammatic and grammatical mean two quite different
things. You can talk about the grammatic structure of a sentence, but
if you are discussing the correctness of that structure, the word is
grammatical.
Americans often have trouble with different meanings. See alternate and
alternative for example.
Graham
Momentarily and soon seem to give them trouble too. And of course
American English is now a language essentially without adverbs.
d
You speak truthfully.
Now, now, Jenn, it is most unladylike to leave such hairy footprints on
dear old Don. He has gone up in my estimation recently for the quality
of his jokes, if not for his anti-Americanism. -- Andre Jute
|

December 30th 06, 06:32 PM
posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
|
|
Can this ignoramus really be an engineer?
Don Pearce said:
Momentarily and soon seem to give them trouble too. And of course
American English is now a language essentially without adverbs.
That's bad grammar, Don. Call your editor.
--
Lionella loves the Krooborg from afar. With mud on top.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
|