![]() |
Biwiring with Nordost
John Phillips wrote:
I haven't estimated the inductance of an individual pair but the parallel connection of so many probably explains why the quoted inductance finally drops back to about 2/3 that of ordinary 12-gauge zip cable. Does it work like that when all the live wires are on one side and all the ground wires are on the other side of a flat cable? Time to brush up on my electomagnetic theory. -- Eiron. |
Biwiring with Nordost
"John Phillips" wrote in message ... On 2007-01-07, Eiron wrote: ... I'm not sure I believe the stated inductance for such a widely spaced cable. Perhaps they fold it in two while measuring the inductance. Here it is: http://www.nordost.com/Cables/speake...lue-heaven.htm Yes - it's a surprising construction. However although the individual conductor pairs are very widely spaced (and therefore have high inductance) it seems there are 36 pairs in parallel. I haven't estimated the inductance of an individual pair but the parallel connection of so many probably explains why the quoted inductance finally drops back to about 2/3 that of ordinary 12-gauge zip cable. If you really do need low inductance for a difficult loudspeaker load then the DIY CAT5 cable approach is really quite effective. It does result in quite a lot of capacitance so it must only be used with a suitably stable amplifier. **Indeed. The way I normally connect Nordost, is to connect each alternate conductor to ground and hot. This reduces inductance significantly. Of course, there are other ways to achieve an excellent result. RG-213/U works for me. Cheap and VERY low inductance. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Biwiring with Nordost
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:33:46 +1100, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote: **Indeed. The way I normally connect Nordost, is to connect each alternate conductor to ground and hot. This reduces inductance significantly. Of course, there are other ways to achieve an excellent result. RG-213/U works for me. Cheap and VERY low inductance. Have a look at their site. Quite amusing. Here's a couple of excerpts from their FAQ section. http://www.nordost.com/faq/faq.cfm Question: Are the cables directional? Answer: Nordost cables are not directional when they are manufactured. However once they have been used for 70 to 80 hours in one direction they will sound better when they are hooked up and used in the original direction of break in Then, on the next page: Question: What direction should the arrows on the cable point? Answer: Unless otherwise noted on the packaging, speaker cables should be connected with the directional arrows pointing to the loudspeakers. Interconnect(signal) cables should be connected with the arrows pointing in the direction of the signal flow. For example, from a Tuner, VCR,CD or DVD player the arrows should go to the preamplifier or amplifier. From the pre-amp the arrows should go into the amplifier. And plenty more. |
Biwiring with Nordost
"Laurence Payne" lpayne1NOSPAM@dslDOTpipexDOTcom wrote in message ... On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:33:46 +1100, "Trevor Wilson" wrote: **Indeed. The way I normally connect Nordost, is to connect each alternate conductor to ground and hot. This reduces inductance significantly. Of course, there are other ways to achieve an excellent result. RG-213/U works for me. Cheap and VERY low inductance. Have a look at their site. Quite amusing. Here's a couple of excerpts from their FAQ section. http://www.nordost.com/faq/faq.cfm Question: Are the cables directional? Answer: Nordost cables are not directional when they are manufactured. However once they have been used for 70 to 80 hours in one direction they will sound better when they are hooked up and used in the original direction of break in Then, on the next page: Question: What direction should the arrows on the cable point? Answer: Unless otherwise noted on the packaging, speaker cables should be connected with the directional arrows pointing to the loudspeakers. Interconnect(signal) cables should be connected with the arrows pointing in the direction of the signal flow. For example, from a Tuner, VCR,CD or DVD player the arrows should go to the preamplifier or amplifier. From the pre-amp the arrows should go into the amplifier. And plenty more. **I'm sure there is. I never bother reading the hyperbole from a manufacturer's site. I am ONLY interested in the technology and the numbers. The science and the numbers tells me all I need to know about how a cable will sound. And trust me: The technology and the numbers from Nordost products is pretty good. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Biwiring with Nordost
Trevor Wilson wrote:
**I'm sure there is. I never bother reading the hyperbole from a manufacturer's site. I am ONLY interested in the technology and the numbers. The science and the numbers tells me all I need to know about how a cable will sound. And trust me: The technology and the numbers from Nordost products is pretty good. There are not many figures for DC resistance on the Nordost website, and some of the other figures look dubious. Do you have some real numbers? -- Eiron. |
Biwiring with Nordost
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 07:45:43 +1100, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote: **I'm sure there is. I never bother reading the hyperbole from a manufacturer's site. I am ONLY interested in the technology and the numbers. The science and the numbers tells me all I need to know about how a cable will sound. And trust me: The technology and the numbers from Nordost products is pretty good. I particularly liked the emphasis on "90% of the speed of light" etc. What technology would you say is important in a speaker cable? |
Biwiring with Nordost
On 2007-01-08, Eiron wrote:
John Phillips wrote: I haven't estimated the inductance of an individual pair but the parallel connection of so many probably explains why the quoted inductance finally drops back to about 2/3 that of ordinary 12-gauge zip cable. Does it work like that when all the live wires are on one side and all the ground wires are on the other side of a flat cable? Time to brush up on my electomagnetic theory. I may possibly have been able to do that particular calculation mumble years ago but I regret that parallel multiply coupled transmission lines is too complex for me now without a lot of re-learning :-(. -- John Phillips |
Biwiring with Nordost
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:01:42 +0000, Eiron wrote:
There are not many figures for DC resistance on the Nordost website, and some of the other figures look dubious. Do you have some real numbers? I don't see a lot of numbers in the reviews enthusing over this stuff. I thought subjective was the name of the game? |
Biwiring with Nordost
"Laurence Payne" lpayne1NOSPAM@dslDOTpipexDOTcom wrote in message ... On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 07:45:43 +1100, "Trevor Wilson" wrote: **I'm sure there is. I never bother reading the hyperbole from a manufacturer's site. I am ONLY interested in the technology and the numbers. The science and the numbers tells me all I need to know about how a cable will sound. And trust me: The technology and the numbers from Nordost products is pretty good. I particularly liked the emphasis on "90% of the speed of light" etc. What technology would you say is important in a speaker cable? **The use of PTFE, the ribbon conductors and the fact that the conductors can be arranged to provide low inductance. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Biwiring with Nordost
"Eiron" wrote in message ... Trevor Wilson wrote: **I'm sure there is. I never bother reading the hyperbole from a manufacturer's site. I am ONLY interested in the technology and the numbers. The science and the numbers tells me all I need to know about how a cable will sound. And trust me: The technology and the numbers from Nordost products is pretty good. There are not many figures for DC resistance on the Nordost website, and some of the other figures look dubious. Do you have some real numbers? **I measured some Nordost some time ago, but I have no idea where those figures are today. Inductance, when properly configured, was about 20% that of regular 'figure 8' (zip cable). The figures can be inferred, merely by examining the construction of any given cable in any case. T'ain't rocket science. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk