![]() |
|
Placing Project Debut III turntable on adjustable cones
Hi guys,
i was reading the following article - http://gallery.audioreview.com/showp...5&limit=recent someone on here suggests getting rid of the the stock feet of the debut III with adjustable cones to improve sound quality. I was wondering how would that affect sound quality? I have pretty sturdy stand and tiled flooring so vibrations aren't much of a problem. Any tips? Cheers Max |
Placing Project Debut III turntable on adjustable cones
On 16 Jan 2007 17:03:42 -0800, "max graff" wrote:
Hi guys, i was reading the following article - http://gallery.audioreview.com/showp...5&limit=recent someone on here suggests getting rid of the the stock feet of the debut III with adjustable cones to improve sound quality. I was wondering how would that affect sound quality? I have pretty sturdy stand and tiled flooring so vibrations aren't much of a problem. Any tips? Yup. Start drinking decaf and take up gardening. It is all starting to get to you - and not in a good way. d -- Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
Placing Project Debut III turntable on adjustable cones
max graff wrote:
Hi guys, i was reading the following article - http://gallery.audioreview.com/showp...5&limit=recent someone on here suggests getting rid of the the stock feet of the debut III with adjustable cones to improve sound quality. I was wondering how would that affect sound quality? I have pretty sturdy stand and tiled flooring so vibrations aren't much of a problem. Any tips? Cheers Max I think this is another case of "different, so must be better". By that I mean that changing the soft rubber feet for hard cones will couple the turntable to the support, as there's no other form of isolation. This will make the turntable behave differently to acoustic feedback, it will make it more susceptible to feedback, as whatever the support is will be storing energy, and passing it directly to the turntable which is now intimately coupled to it. Previously, with the soft rubber feet, only acoustic energy falling directly on the turntable (including of course the cover) could give rise to feedback. Consequently, the turntable system will now sound different, and in this peculiar world many of us inhabit, any change is seen as an improvement. If the turntable had genuinely sounded better with hard cones rather than rubber feet, don't you suppose the manufacturer might have supplied it that way? S. |
Placing Project Debut III turntable on adjustable cones
Serge Auckland wrote:
max graff wrote: Hi guys, i was reading the following article - http://gallery.audioreview.com/showp...5&limit=recent someone on here suggests getting rid of the the stock feet of the debut III with adjustable cones to improve sound quality. I was wondering how would that affect sound quality? I have pretty sturdy stand and tiled flooring so vibrations aren't much of a problem. Any tips? Cheers Max I think this is another case of "different, so must be better". By that I mean that changing the soft rubber feet for hard cones will couple the turntable to the support, as there's no other form of isolation. This will make the turntable behave differently to acoustic feedback, it will make it more susceptible to feedback, as whatever the support is will be storing energy, and passing it directly to the turntable which is now intimately coupled to it. Previously, with the soft rubber feet, only acoustic energy falling directly on the turntable (including of course the cover) could give rise to feedback. Consequently, the turntable system will now sound different, and in this peculiar world many of us inhabit, any change is seen as an improvement. If the turntable had genuinely sounded better with hard cones rather than rubber feet, don't you suppose the manufacturer might have supplied it that way? S. I would have expected the manufacturer to have supplied the best solution that would cover the worst case user. It may be that in this case, a low level of isolation may be sufficient to prevent feedback. And it may be that a different suspension could be a improvement. My car seat has several adjustments to make it fit me, the same may be true here. But you can't know for certain without trying. There are several other things you can stand a turntable on to see if they make a difference without spending HiFi prices. Squash balls and wooden cabinet handles are two you could try and see if you think there is a difference and if you prefer it (avoiding the "better" word). Making sure the table is level however is something you need to check whatever you stand it on. -- Nick |
Placing Project Debut III turntable on adjustable cones
Nick Gorham wrote:
Serge Auckland wrote: max graff wrote: Hi guys, i was reading the following article - http://gallery.audioreview.com/showp...5&limit=recent someone on here suggests getting rid of the the stock feet of the debut III with adjustable cones to improve sound quality. I was wondering how would that affect sound quality? I have pretty sturdy stand and tiled flooring so vibrations aren't much of a problem. Any tips? Cheers Max I think this is another case of "different, so must be better". By that I mean that changing the soft rubber feet for hard cones will couple the turntable to the support, as there's no other form of isolation. This will make the turntable behave differently to acoustic feedback, it will make it more susceptible to feedback, as whatever the support is will be storing energy, and passing it directly to the turntable which is now intimately coupled to it. Previously, with the soft rubber feet, only acoustic energy falling directly on the turntable (including of course the cover) could give rise to feedback. Consequently, the turntable system will now sound different, and in this peculiar world many of us inhabit, any change is seen as an improvement. If the turntable had genuinely sounded better with hard cones rather than rubber feet, don't you suppose the manufacturer might have supplied it that way? S. I would have expected the manufacturer to have supplied the best solution that would cover the worst case user. It may be that in this case, a low level of isolation may be sufficient to prevent feedback. And it may be that a different suspension could be a improvement. I agree that the manufacturer will supply the best solution that would cover the worst case user. However, if in this case, a lower level of isolation may be sufficient, I don't understand why changing to cones (which have *no* isolation) could be an improvement. At best, there would be no difference, at worse the lack of isolation will change the sound. Then it goes back to my original thought that different=better. My car seat has several adjustments to make it fit me, the same may be true here. No really, unless the manufacturer fitted adjustable hardness suspension, which they didn't. But you can't know for certain without trying. There are several other things you can stand a turntable on to see if they make a difference without spending HiFi prices. Squash balls and wooden cabinet handles are two you could try and see if you think there is a difference and if you prefer it (avoiding the "better" word). Agree absolutely that the suspension makes a difference to the propensity to feedback and hence coloration. However, as the manufacturer has done their best to provide isolation in the form of soft rubber feet, how is changing that an improvement? different=better again? Your avoidance of the word "better" above is a bit of sophistry given that if you prefer it, then, for you, it *is* better. My post was an attempt to be objective, that all changes, *even if you prefer them* are not necessarily better when evaluated objectively. Making sure the table is level however is something you need to check whatever you stand it on. Hear Hear! S. |
Placing Project Debut III turntable on adjustable cones
Serge Auckland wrote:
Agree absolutely that the suspension makes a difference to the propensity to feedback and hence coloration. However, as the manufacturer has done their best to provide isolation in the form of soft rubber feet, how is changing that an improvement? different=better again? Your avoidance of the word "better" above is a bit of sophistry given that if you prefer it, then, for you, it *is* better. My post was an attempt to be objective, that all changes, *even if you prefer them* are not necessarily better when evaluated objectively. Well, I avoided the (subjective)better==(objective)better problem to try and escape triggering the potential flame fest that often happens. But to address your point, there is more going on in the mechanics of a turntable than just isolation. If the table needs compliant mounting to avoid feedback, then thats fine use it. However if the support is sufficiently isolated to avoid that, then there can be advantages to increasing the effective mass of the turntable by solid coupling, as this can reduce the effect of motor induced vibration. Which in my limited experence of Project turntables may be worthwhile as the motors are often not as silent as could be hoped. Again, YMMV, but the point is, it can vary, hence my suggestion to try cheap solutions to see if the result it to the OP's liking. -- Nick |
Placing Project Debut III turntable on adjustable cones
"Nick Gorham" wrote in message
. uk But to address your point, there is more going on in the mechanics of a turntable than just isolation. If the table needs compliant mounting to avoid feedback, then thats fine use it. However if the support is sufficiently isolated to avoid that, then there can be advantages to increasing the effective mass of the turntable by solid coupling, as this can reduce the effect of motor induced vibration. Here's a skill-testing question for you, Nick. What are good ways to figure out which problem is most important to a given vinyl rig? |
Placing Project Debut III turntable on adjustable cones
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Nick Gorham" wrote in message . uk But to address your point, there is more going on in the mechanics of a turntable than just isolation. If the table needs compliant mounting to avoid feedback, then thats fine use it. However if the support is sufficiently isolated to avoid that, then there can be advantages to increasing the effective mass of the turntable by solid coupling, as this can reduce the effect of motor induced vibration. Here's a skill-testing question for you, Nick. What are good ways to figure out which problem is most important to a given vinyl rig? Hmm, have to think on that one. Just realised though, that increasing the effective mass of the turntable can also increase its resistance to air and support born vibration, so its not a either/or situation. -- Nick |
Placing Project Debut III turntable on adjustable cones
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Nick Gorham" wrote in message . uk But to address your point, there is more going on in the mechanics of a turntable than just isolation. If the table needs compliant mounting to avoid feedback, then thats fine use it. However if the support is sufficiently isolated to avoid that, then there can be advantages to increasing the effective mass of the turntable by solid coupling, as this can reduce the effect of motor induced vibration. Here's a skill-testing question for you, Nick. What are good ways to figure out which problem is most important to a given vinyl rig? One thought would be to compare recording of the output of the table both in the sound field of the loudspeakers and not. But that isn't comparing the effect of reducing the mass. I guess, you would have to make four recordings, and decide which of them was prefered. -- Nick |
Placing Project Debut III turntable on adjustable cones
"Don Pearce" wrote in message ... On 16 Jan 2007 17:03:42 -0800, "max graff" wrote: Hi guys, i was reading the following article - http://gallery.audioreview.com/showp...5&limit=recent someone on here suggests getting rid of the the stock feet of the debut III with adjustable cones to improve sound quality. I was wondering how would that affect sound quality? I have pretty sturdy stand and tiled flooring so vibrations aren't much of a problem. Any tips? Yup. Start drinking decaf and take up gardening. It is all starting to get to you - and not in a good way. I'm with you on this one, Don..... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:25 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk