![]() |
A psychologist's view of Hi-Fi fetishism
You should know.
"Phil Allison" wrote in message ... "Arny Krueger" IME, salemen as a rule just don't know any better. Only a few of them have a strong background in tech. I'm not sure this is *always* a bad thing, as one can know too much to be an effective salesman. ** Just like having a conscience or any empathy would get in the way of being an effective Nazi ? ....... Phil |
A psychologist's view of Hi-Fi fetishism
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 09:16:28 +1100, Mark Ilsley wrote:
"Phil Allison" wrote in message snipped You should know. Do you find that the "no I'm not, but you are" argument works well around your circle of friends? Most people find that it quits working by around the time they get into junior high school. |
A psychologist's view of Hi-Fi fetishism
9/11 Wasn't Real wrote: Yeah, all that **** that blew up in New York was a ****in' cartoon, right? You asshole. My conclusion after listening was that xyz was more capable of conveying intangible things like the degree of commitment displayed by musicians in a performance... BwahahahahahahHAH! The jerk who wrote that is as dumb as you are. LV |
A psychologist's view of Hi-Fi fetishism
On Mar 7, 6:04 pm, Lord Valve wrote:
9/11 Wasn't Real wrote: Yeah, all that **** that blew up in New York was a ****in' cartoon, right? You asshole. My conclusion after listening was that xyz was more capable of conveying intangible things like the degree of commitment displayed by musicians in a performance... BwahahahahahahHAH! The jerk who wrote that is as dumb as you are. LV Valvey... Valvey... Valvey This jackass is searching for a nibble. My response was to attempt to ascertain the sh*t-level-by-eye-color... Dumb, not hardly. Pulling various and sundry chains... precisely. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
A psychologist's view of Hi-Fi fetishism
"9/11 Wasn't Real" wrote in message
oups.com... Many of us are becoming increasingly aware of those audiophiles who show an extraordinary preoccupation with hi-fi equipment for its own sake. Contributors to as well as readers of HFN/RR have expressed irritation with this so-called lunatic fringe, which has been repeatedly criticized for being out of touch with reality. snip most of this post for brevity's sake As we would expect, rational assessment can do very little against such feelings; it is a poor weapon against the mystifications of fetishistic publicity. I might add that manufacturers who allow themselves to be exalted and aggrandized by fetishists in the same manner as their products are doing themselves a disservice. For they too are indulging in a form of narcissistic gratification and are lending yet further credibility to the lunatic fringe. From Hi-Fi News and Record Review, October 1981 http://www.heretical.com/miscella/zfetish.html A precised version of this post, albeit somewhat tongue in cheek, can be had by listening to Flanders' & Swan's song 'High Fidelity'. Can't remember whether it's on their first album, 'At the Drop of a Hat' or on their second, 'At the Drop of Another Hat'. Sorry. ruff |
A psychologist's view of Hi-Fi fetishism
In this case, who needs to make an argument.
(p.s. Death to all bottom posters and Phil-o-philes) "AZ Nomad" wrote in message ... On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 09:16:28 +1100, Mark Ilsley wrote: "Phil Allison" wrote in message snipped You should know. Do you find that the "no I'm not, but you are" argument works well around your circle of friends? Most people find that it quits working by around the time they get into junior high school. |
A psychologist's view of Hi-Fi fetishism
"AZ Nomad" wrote in message
... On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 09:16:28 +1100, Mark Ilsley wrote: "Phil Allison" wrote in message snipped You should know. Do you find that the "no I'm not, but you are" argument works well around your circle of friends? Most people find that it quits working by around the time they get into junior high school. If you believe that Phil Allison is a member of anyone on aus.hi-fi's circle of friends, either you don't know him very well or the circle you're referring to has a diameter of 1 mm or less. Mark's reply was in fact, quite succinct, as Philthy has used the term 'Nazi' to describe almost everyone on this newsgroup at some time or other, and so, by now, ought to be an expert on the subject. ruff |
A psychologist's view of Hi-Fi fetishism
"roughplanet" wrote in message ... :: : If you believe that Phil Allison is a member of anyone on aus.hi-fi's circle : of friends, either you don't know him very well or the circle you're : referring to has a diameter of 1 mm or less. : Mark's reply was in fact, quite succinct, as Philthy has used the term : 'Nazi' to describe almost everyone on this newsgroup at some time or other, : and so, by now, ought to be an expert on the subject. : : ruff : I wish to invoke Godwin's Law ;-) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwins_law BTW it's directed at you Ruff BUT the first person who mentioned it i.e. Philthy. Cheers TT |
A psychologist's view of Hi-Fi fetishism
"TT" wrote in message
... "roughplanet" wrote in message ... : : If you believe that Phil Allison is a member of anyone on aus.hi-fi's circle : of friends, either you don't know him very well or the circle you're : referring to has a diameter of 1 mm or less. : Mark's reply was in fact, quite succinct, as Philthy has used the term : 'Nazi' to describe almost everyone on this newsgroup at some time or other, : and so, by now, ought to be an expert on the subject. I wish to invoke Godwin's Law ;-) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwins_law BTW it's directed at you Ruff BUT the first person who mentioned it i.e. Philthy. How appropriate. Godwin must know Philthy pretty well :-). ruff |
A psychologist's view of Hi-Fi fetishism
In article .com,
Karl Winkler wrote: In the photo newsgroups, equipment is discussed endlessly while the .technique groups see very little activity. Clearly, it's easier to discuss the merits of equipment rather than to focus on what really makes the difference: the recording or photography techniques, etc. First of all, most buyers of hi-fi equipment are limited to just reproduction of what somebody else has recorded. Just about the only creative input is which track to play next. However, my guess is that for the technically inclined people it is much easier to talk about features of equipment than to talk about, for example, photography techniques. And even if the participants know the concepts to discuss a piece of music or a photograph, there is such a wide range in tastes, that a discussion may not go anywhere. So in the end, it is quite possible that equipment oriented forums will see the most activity. -- That was it. Done. The faulty Monk was turned out into the desert where it could believe what it liked, including the idea that it had been hard done by. It was allowed to keep its horse, since horses were so cheap to make. -- Douglas Adams in Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk