A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Replacing the ProJect 8.6 tonearm cable



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8 (permalink)  
Old March 19th 07, 06:46 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Arny Krueger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,850
Default Replacing the ProJect 8.6 tonearm cable

"Laurence Payne" lpayne1NOSPAM@dslDOTpipexDOTcom wrote in
message
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:24:07 -0000, "Keith G"


wrote:


Perceived detail is perceived detail, no matter how it's
delivered


Or artificially created during playback?

- the trouble with CD/digital generally is its
comparatively collapsed/2D imaging


No doubt due to a lack of interchannel phase and amplitude errors.

which 'buries' detail



IOW fails to create perceived detail (AKA spurious responses) during
playback.

(IME) no matter what the 'resolution' is claimed to be
and it really needs accompanying video to help 'unpack' it......


Ohhhh...

Is that the conventional wisdom in your world? :-)


One gets a lot of this sort of tripe if one hangs around vinyl bigots.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.