| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
|
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
John Byrns wrote: In article .com, Peter Wieck wrote: On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898 What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration. Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both? Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to Wieckless!). Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the "unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards. The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would require 4 x 6BQ5. You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time. It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them, he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance, Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor. Regards, John Byrns -- Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/ Andre Jute No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless Wieckless -- CE Statement of Conformity (1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever. (2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
On May 24, 5:13 pm, Andre Jute wrote:
John Byrns wrote: In article .com, Peter Wieck wrote: On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898 What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration. Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both? Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to Wieckless!). Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the "unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards. The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would require 4 x 6BQ5. You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time. It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them, he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance, Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor. Regards, John Byrns -- Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/ Andre Jute No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless Wieckless -- CE Statement of Conformity (1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever. (2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler Ittsssssss BAAAAcccckkkk..... I knew that it could not ever really 'leave the building'. That would be too good to be true even in the most perfect of all worlds. Hey, McCoy... we are all given to making mistakes. When will you admit to your first? Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
On 24 May 2007 15:36:20 -0700, Peter Wieck wrote:
On May 24, 5:13 pm, Andre Jute wrote: John Byrns wrote: In article .com, Peter Wieck wrote: On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898 What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration. Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both? Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to Wieckless!). Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the "unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards. The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would require 4 x 6BQ5. You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time. It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them, he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance, Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor. Regards, John Byrns -- Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/ Andre Jute No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless Wieckless -- CE Statement of Conformity (1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever. (2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler Ittsssssss BAAAAcccckkkk..... I knew that it could not ever really 'leave the building'. That would be too good to be true even in the most perfect of all worlds. Hey, McCoy... we are all given to making mistakes. When will you admit to your first? Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA Remember Peter the Great? We have Peter the idiot! __________________________________________________ __ For the folks that get confused when I post from different computers: KE4ODD, Tracy Fort, Beerbarrel and whatever the hell else you want to call me are all the same person!....ME! |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
How did all these sock puppet losers and their 6L6 variants find this forum?
They should all return to, rec.audio.tubes before some of the resident Rottweilers on this forum eat them for breakfast! Omer "KE4ODD" wrote in message ... On 24 May 2007 15:36:20 -0700, Peter Wieck wrote: On May 24, 5:13 pm, Andre Jute wrote: John Byrns wrote: In article .com, Peter Wieck wrote: On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898 What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration. Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both? Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to Wieckless!). Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the "unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards. The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would require 4 x 6BQ5. You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time. It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them, he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance, Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor. Regards, John Byrns -- Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/ Andre Jute No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless Wieckless -- CE Statement of Conformity (1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever. (2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler Ittsssssss BAAAAcccckkkk..... I knew that it could not ever really 'leave the building'. That would be too good to be true even in the most perfect of all worlds. Hey, McCoy... we are all given to making mistakes. When will you admit to your first? Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA Remember Peter the Great? We have Peter the idiot! __________________________________________________ __ For the folks that get confused when I post from different computers: KE4ODD, Tracy Fort, Beerbarrel and whatever the hell else you want to call me are all the same person!....ME! |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
Omer Suleimanagich wrote: How did all these sock puppet losers and their 6L6 variants find this forum? Ooh, you're so macho, Omer. The other guy on these conferences who worries about his masculinity, Bret Ludwig, also takes target practice with 6L6. I'm pretty poncey myself, having taught my son to shoot at Mullard EL34 lined up on the wall, giving him a candy every time he popped 16 in a row (about that time, just before he had his first birthday, the boy got his first computer and stopped thinking in dozens; 16 is apparently 2*4). They should all return to, rec.audio.tubes before some of the resident Rottweilers on this forum eat them for breakfast! Rotweilers cut into good steaks but are a bit small, you know. I'll tell you what, lions smell high and their meat is just about pre- hung. Throw in a few lions, the Christians are hungry. Omer Go on, Omer, tell me you aren't as recklessly self-destructive as you sound: tell me you're a spotty teenager with his dick in his hand and perhaps I can persuade most of my guys to overlook your impertinence. Andre Jute You know you're middle-aged when the best overheard conversations aren't about sex but about food. You know you're old when the best overheard conversations are about gardening. "KE4ODD" wrote in message ... On 24 May 2007 15:36:20 -0700, Peter Wieck wrote: On May 24, 5:13 pm, Andre Jute wrote: John Byrns wrote: In article .com, Peter Wieck wrote: On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898 What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration. Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both? Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to Wieckless!). Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the "unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards. The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would require 4 x 6BQ5. You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time. It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them, he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance, Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor. Regards, John Byrns -- Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/ Andre Jute No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless Wieckless -- CE Statement of Conformity (1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever. (2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler Ittsssssss BAAAAcccckkkk..... I knew that it could not ever really 'leave the building'. That would be too good to be true even in the most perfect of all worlds. Hey, McCoy... we are all given to making mistakes. When will you admit to your first? Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA Remember Peter the Great? We have Peter the idiot! __________________________________________________ __ For the folks that get confused when I post from different computers: KE4ODD, Tracy Fort, Beerbarrel and whatever the hell else you want to call me are all the same person!....ME! |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
"Peter Wieck" wrote in message oups.com... On May 24, 5:13 pm, Andre Jute wrote: John Byrns wrote: In article .com, Peter Wieck wrote: On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898 What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration. Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both? Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to Wieckless!). Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the "unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards. The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would require 4 x 6BQ5. You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time. It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them, he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance, Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor. Regards, John Byrns -- Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/ Andre Jute No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless Wieckless -- CE Statement of Conformity (1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever. (2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler Ittsssssss BAAAAcccckkkk..... I knew that it could not ever really 'leave the building'. That would be too good to be true even in the most perfect of all worlds. Hey, McCoy... we are all given to making mistakes. When will you admit to your first? I don't know when the Boss' first mistake was, but I know his latest one ... that was not easing up on you when you obviously had enough. I bet your dog doesn't even recognize you anymore. Brutal, ugly, one sided massacre. Take my advice and please don't mess around anymore with the Boss or high voltage... west Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
On May 24, 7:38 pm, "Omer Suleimanagich"
wrote: How did all these sock puppet losers and their 6L6 variants find this forum? Somebody apparently left the door open. Jeff |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
All this over a piece of **** Magnavox chassis that should have been
scrapped as a favor to good sound. |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
On May 24, 7:38 pm, "Omer Suleimanagich"
wrote: How did all these sock puppet losers and their 6L6 variants find this forum? They should all return to, rec.audio.tubes before some of the resident Rottweilers on this forum eat them for breakfast! Omer They all have Mad Cow Disease, let they writhe in pain and die quietly ALONE. |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
On May 24, 8:25 pm, "west" wrote:
"Peter Wieck" wrote in message oups.com... On May 24, 5:13 pm, Andre Jute wrote: John Byrns wrote: In article .com, Peter Wieck wrote: On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898 What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration. Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both? Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to Wieckless!). Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the "unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards. The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would require 4 x 6BQ5. You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time. It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them, he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance, Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor. Regards, John Byrns -- Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/ Andre Jute No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless Wieckless -- CE Statement of Conformity (1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever. (2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler Ittsssssss BAAAAcccckkkk..... I knew that it could not ever really 'leave the building'. That would be too good to be true even in the most perfect of all worlds. Hey, McCoy... we are all given to making mistakes. When will you admit to your first? I don't know when the Boss' first mistake was, but I know his latest one ... that was not easing up on you when you obviously had enough. I bet your dog doesn't even recognize you anymore. Brutal, ugly, one sided massacre. Take my advice and please don't mess around anymore with the Boss or high voltage... west Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA Big, fractured gasbags without an earnest lick of talent. PAH |
Public Apology to Andre Jute - And the Reasons Why
It appears that all along I had been taking Mr. Jute for a healthy
(if perverse and peculiar) individual who was given to a rich fantasy life to fill his otherwise dull existence. While this may be so in general, there is a much more direct explanation for is behavior that forgives all his poses, fantasies, lies and charlatanism. He is, with great specificity, not of sound mine. By his own words to Henry Pasternack some time past: : Henry: : : Now that youve come to your senses, I wish you luck. Things can only improve. Look on the bright side: the experience will eventually strengthen you. Ive been there. In my late twenties after a couple of strokes brought on either by the stress of my job in advertising or a blood clot left over after a racing incident, I was totally unemployable, a physical and mental cripple (possibly in a worse state than the plucky and entertaining Al Marcy), a condition that coincided with me being made a stateless refugee because of my political activities. Without pretending that I can ever know how you feltin retrospect it is clear that friends and near-strangers looked after me by giving me consulting jobs I could handle in the hour a day I could concentrate so that I was never hungry and my confidence didnt suffer too badlyit was still an uncomfortably sobering experience. The main thing is not to let it embitter you, or slow down your future. : : Music is great solaceplaying through my collection of Gregorian Chant at the momentand one of my great regrets is that I never learned to play any instrument properly: it is a mistake, learned too late, to discard activitities one cannot execute to the highest standard. When you give your public debut on the piano, let us know so we can send congratulatory telegrams to the dressing room. : : Good luck. : : Andre Brain damage is a subtle thing. It explains why Mr. Jute does not drive. Why he does not show his face in his photos, and when he does show himself it is on 20-30 year-old vanity shots from his publisher. It would explain his poor hearing and the results therefrom. It also explains his peculiar behavior such that the joke: "Get his medication(s) adjusted" is no joke at all. It explains his apparent bi- polar behavior, his need for primacy and the compensations he builds into his life to get them, and his inordinate pride in the smallest accomplishments such as boiling water for spaghetti and braising a couple of chicken-breasts, as well as actually being able to ride a bicycle. It also explains why it is that he does not drive... a very simple thing, but imagine if that were taken from you by force-of- accident. I don't mind exchanging invective and vituperation with a whole individual and/or one who chooses his/her benighted condition deliberately. But I draw the line at kicking cripples. My apologies, again. From here and ever after, Mr. Jute, if I engage with you it will be on the specific merits at hand and not your general manner and the consequences of your handicap as you cannot help it. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
Public Apology to Andre Jute - And the Reasons Why
"Peter Wieck" wrote in message oups.com... It appears that all along I had been taking Mr. Jute for a healthy (snip snip) My apologies, again. From here and ever after, Mr. Jute, if I engage with you it will be on the specific merits at hand and not your general manner and the consequences of your handicap as you cannot help it. Peter, after reading all this mess (why am I wasting my time?) and trying to decipher it, it appears that somewhere along the line you made a mistake? Uh, if that's the case we've all done it, but it seems the bigger mistake might be to apologize to a nutcase who appears to be from another world, who can't speak plain English, and who can't let it go. Again I wonder how crackpots with mental conditions seem to know how to use a keyboard and get online . . . Peter, you're welcome to stay. The rest of you, OUT! OUT! NOW! Shoo! Goway! (Grabbing the rifle full or salt) BANG! BANG! BOOM! -- Gary E. Tayman/Tayman Electrical Sound Solutions For Classic Cars http://www.taymanelectrical.com |
Public Apology to Andre Jute - And the Reasons Why
"Gary Tayman" wrote in message news:q1A5i.8869$ky6.2030@trnddc02... "Peter Wieck" wrote in message oups.com... It appears that all along I had been taking Mr. Jute for a healthy (snip snip) My apologies, again. From here and ever after, Mr. Jute, if I engage with you it will be on the specific merits at hand and not your general manner and the consequences of your handicap as you cannot help it. Peter, after reading all this mess (why am I wasting my time?) and trying to decipher it, it appears that somewhere along the line you made a mistake? Uh, if that's the case we've all done it, but it seems the bigger mistake might be to apologize to a nutcase who appears to be from another world, who can't speak plain English, and who can't let it go. Again I wonder how crackpots with mental conditions seem to know how to use a keyboard and get online . . . Peter, you're welcome to stay. The rest of you, OUT! OUT! NOW! Shoo! Goway! (Grabbing the rifle full or salt) BANG! BANG! BOOM! Would that be an 'or salt' rifle...?? :-) |
Public Apology to Andre Jute - And the Reasons Why
On May 25, 6:47 am, "Gary Tayman" wrote:
"Peter Wieck" wrote in message oups.com... It appears that all along I had been taking Mr. Jute for a healthy (snip snip) My apologies, again. From here and ever after, Mr. Jute, if I engage with you it will be on the specific merits at hand and not your general manner and the consequences of your handicap as you cannot help it. Peter, after reading all this mess (why am I wasting my time?) and trying to decipher it, it appears that somewhere along the line you made a mistake? Uh, if that's the case we've all done it, but it seems the bigger mistake might be to apologize to a nutcase who appears to be from another world, who can't speak plain English, and who can't let it go. Again I wonder how crackpots with mental conditions seem to know how to use a keyboard and get online . . . Peter, you're welcome to stay. The rest of you, OUT! OUT! NOW! Shoo! Goway! (Grabbing the rifle full or salt) BANG! BANG! BOOM! -- Gary E. Tayman/Tayman Electrical Sound Solutions For Classic Carshttp://www.taymanelectrical.com That's pretty funny Tayman. Once again your over blown ego is displayed quite nicely telling us to go away. Why don't you open the door and leave first? |
Public Apology to Andre Jute - And the Reasons Why
Gary:
Thank you for the support. I am sorry that anyone at the Radio end even had to get involved. However, ethically, it is no mistake to apologize to a damaged individual, especially when one discovers that the damage explains almost entirely their otherwise incredibly inept, insane and deranged behavior. I have often stated that Usenet requires a dry sense of humor within the hide of a rhinocerous. Mr. Jute has neither, and that is beyond his control. So, if I engage with him in the future, I have to tone down the invective as he is afflicted with at least several of the long-term results of a stroke... which in turn cause him to be without the usual social controls, respect for facts and the truth and so forth: Long-Term Effects of Stroke (abstracted): Mood changes - these include mood swings, irritability, laughing or crying even when you do not feel particularly happy or sad. Depression is extremely common following a stroke, with symptoms such as loss of appetite, insomnia, crying, low self-esteem and anxiety that can all be signs of depression. Cognitive difficulties - these include problems caused by damage to areas of the brain controlling mental processes such as thinking clearly and logically, learning, paying attention, memory, decision- making and forward planning. Behaviour changes - these may include being slower to react than before the stroke, excessive caution, disorganisation, finding it difficult to adjust to change and becoming confused or irritated. Each day must be a struggle. My sympathies, even if the recipient cannot accept or understand them. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
Public Apology to Andre Jute - And the Reasons Why
On May 25, 4:09 am, Peter Wieck wrote:
It appears that all along I had been taking Mr. Jute for a healthy (if perverse and peculiar) individual who was given to a rich fantasy life to fill his otherwise dull existence. While this may be so in general, there is a much more direct explanation for is behavior that forgives all his poses, fantasies, lies and charlatanism. He is, with great specificity, not of sound mine. By his own words to Henry Pasternack some time past: : Henry: : : Now that youve come to your senses, I wish you luck. Things can only improve. Look on the bright side: the experience will eventually strengthen you. Ive been there. In my late twenties after a couple of strokes brought on either by the stress of my job in advertising or a blood clot left over after a racing incident, I was totally unemployable, a physical and mental cripple (possibly in a worse state than the plucky and entertaining Al Marcy), a condition that coincided with me being made a stateless refugee because of my political activities. Without pretending that I can ever know how you feltin retrospect it is clear that friends and near-strangers looked after me by giving me consulting jobs I could handle in the hour a day I could concentrate so that I was never hungry and my confidence didnt suffer too badlyit was still an uncomfortably sobering experience. The main thing is not to let it embitter you, or slow down your future. : : Music is great solaceplaying through my collection of Gregorian Chant at the momentand one of my great regrets is that I never learned to play any instrument properly: it is a mistake, learned too late, to discard activitities one cannot execute to the highest standard. When you give your public debut on the piano, let us know so we can send congratulatory telegrams to the dressing room. : : Good luck. : : Andre Brain damage is a subtle thing. It explains why Mr. Jute does not drive. Why he does not show his face in his photos, and when he does show himself it is on 20-30 year-old vanity shots from his publisher. It would explain his poor hearing and the results therefrom. It also explains his peculiar behavior such that the joke: "Get his medication(s) adjusted" is no joke at all. It explains his apparent bi- polar behavior, his need for primacy and the compensations he builds into his life to get them, and his inordinate pride in the smallest accomplishments such as boiling water for spaghetti and braising a couple of chicken-breasts, as well as actually being able to ride a bicycle. It also explains why it is that he does not drive... a very simple thing, but imagine if that were taken from you by force-of- accident. I don't mind exchanging invective and vituperation with a whole individual and/or one who chooses his/her benighted condition deliberately. But I draw the line at kicking cripples. My apologies, again. From here and ever after, Mr. Jute, if I engage with you it will be on the specific merits at hand and not your general manner and the consequences of your handicap as you cannot help it. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA You apparently have this problem with EVERYBODY. So far I can see you are off yours. WHOEVER YOU ARE. |
Public Apology to Andre Jute - And the Reasons Why
Peter Wieck wrote:
ethically, it is no mistake to apologize to a damaged individual, especially when one discovers that the damage explains almost entirely their otherwise incredibly inept, insane and deranged behavior. I have often stated that Usenet requires a dry sense of humor within the hide of a rhinocerous. Mr. Jute has neither, and that is beyond his control. So, if I engage with him in the future, I have to tone down the invective as he is afflicted with at least several of the long-term results of a stroke... Peter, I am curious as to why you chose to engage with this guy at all. When these bizarre threads started showing up in RAR+P, It took the reading of exactly one post to recognize that this guy was either a troll giving an academy-award caliber performance, or someone more loopy than all the rides at Magic Mountain put together. Either way, he isn't someome I'd waste any time on. -Scott |
Public Apology to Andre Jute - And the Reasons Why
Scott,
RAT can get addictive because, out of the loony sphere, there are some great threads and contributors. Omer "Scott W. Harvey" wrote in message ... Peter Wieck wrote: ethically, it is no mistake to apologize to a damaged individual, especially when one discovers that the damage explains almost entirely their otherwise incredibly inept, insane and deranged behavior. I have often stated that Usenet requires a dry sense of humor within the hide of a rhinocerous. Mr. Jute has neither, and that is beyond his control. So, if I engage with him in the future, I have to tone down the invective as he is afflicted with at least several of the long-term results of a stroke... Peter, I am curious as to why you chose to engage with this guy at all. When these bizarre threads started showing up in RAR+P, It took the reading of exactly one post to recognize that this guy was either a troll giving an academy-award caliber performance, or someone more loopy than all the rides at Magic Mountain put together. Either way, he isn't someome I'd waste any time on. -Scott |
Public Apology to Andre Jute - And the Reasons Why
On May 25, 10:28 pm, "Omer Suleimanagich"
wrote: Scott, RAT can get addictive because, out of the loony sphere, there are some great threads and contributors. Omer "Scott W. Harvey" wrote in ... Peter Wieck wrote: ethically, it is no mistake to apologize to a damaged individual, especially when one discovers that the damage explains almost entirely their otherwise incredibly inept, insane and deranged behavior. I have often stated that Usenet requires a dry sense of humor within the hide of a rhinocerous. Mr. Jute has neither, and that is beyond his control. So, if I engage with him in the future, I have to tone down the invective as he is afflicted with at least several of the long-term results of a stroke... Peter, I am curious as to why you chose to engage with this guy at all. When these bizarre threads started showing up in RAR+P, It took the reading of exactly one post to recognize that this guy was either a troll giving an academy-award caliber performance, or someone more loopy than all the rides at Magic Mountain put together. Either way, he isn't someome I'd waste any time on. -Scott- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm just observing the way he treated others with strokes. Different CHOKES for different...yeah, just grow up, Peter. You used to contribute more. Pre-empting Tracy now...stop in again soon. |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fasingle ended stereo tube amp
Gary Tayman wrote:
BOOM! BANG! Goway! (Reloading) BANG! BOOM! I'd give up on the salt rifle, and try out one of those shock and awe bombs, but these guys would just look into the sky and think it's pretty. Rifle? Its rock salt in a sawed off shotgun. No wonder you can't run them off! ;-) -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message ... Rifle? Its rock salt in a sawed off shotgun. No wonder you can't run them off! ;-) (Borrowing yours) BAANNGG! BOOOMMM! POWWW! Goway! Shoo! By the way Michael, did you by chance make it to the Orlando meet this morning? I got there a little late, but made it. If you should make it to any of these, let me know so we can meet. -- Gary E. Tayman/Tayman Electrical Sound Solutions For Classic Cars http://www.taymanelectrical.com |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fasingle ended stereo tube amp
Gary Tayman wrote:
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message ... Rifle? Its rock salt in a sawed off shotgun. No wonder you can't run them off! ;-) (Borrowing yours) BAANNGG! BOOOMMM! POWWW! Goway! Shoo! Remember to aim for their ass. (make sure that you add some Alum to the rock salt so their wounds pucker shut over the rock salt.) ;-) By the way Michael, did you by chance make it to the Orlando meet this morning? I got there a little late, but made it. If you should make it to any of these, let me know so we can meet. No, I couldn't find a ride, even though I offered to chip in for gas. I was given two email addresses for people who had to pass me on the way. Only one replied, to tell me he didn't have any room. I wanted to go, but I'll have to try next time. Its probably a good thing that i couldn't today. I had a couple large pressure sores pop up and burst a few days ago, and I really don't need to be on my feet much, for a week or so. Now I really have to go, to get my shotgun back. :-) -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message ... Gary Tayman wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message ... No, I couldn't find a ride, even though I offered to chip in for gas. I was given two email addresses for people who had to pass me on the way. Only one replied, to tell me he didn't have any room. I wanted to go, but I'll have to try next time. Its probably a good thing that i couldn't today. .... I guess that tells you something ... |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
I find it a sorry state of affairs when I see these fragmented responses
after filtering. None of this needs posting here. Responders are just as whacky as the original poster. Original poster may be certifiably insane, but responders seem likewise to me. Phil B wrote in message oups.com... John Byrns wrote: In article .com, Peter Wieck wrote: On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898 What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration. Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both? Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to Wieckless!). Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the "unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards. The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would require 4 x 6BQ5. You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time. It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them, he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance, Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor. Regards, John Byrns -- Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/ Andre Jute No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless Wieckless -- CE Statement of Conformity (1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever. (2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
Andre's sock puppets?!
Omer "Phil B" wrote in message news:bP96i.287$106.213@trndny02... I find it a sorry state of affairs when I see these fragmented responses after filtering. None of this needs posting here. Responders are just as whacky as the original poster. Original poster may be certifiably insane, but responders seem likewise to me. Phil B wrote in message oups.com... John Byrns wrote: In article .com, Peter Wieck wrote: On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898 What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration. Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both? Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to Wieckless!). Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the "unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards. The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would require 4 x 6BQ5. You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time. It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them, he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance, Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor. Regards, John Byrns -- Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/ Andre Jute No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless Wieckless -- CE Statement of Conformity (1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever. (2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
Phil, in case you didn't notice you have just placed yourself in the
category of "certifiably insane" you have placed others in. More to the point, what is wrong with correcting Peter's factual error when he suggested that the original poster was incorrectly describing the amplifier in question? Do you want this group to be full of misinformation like the forums? Regards, John Byrns In article bP96i.287$106.213@trndny02, "Phil B" wrote: I find it a sorry state of affairs when I see these fragmented responses after filtering. None of this needs posting here. Responders are just as whacky as the original poster. Original poster may be certifiably insane, but responders seem likewise to me. Phil B wrote in message oups.com... John Byrns wrote: In article .com, Peter Wieck wrote: On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898 What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration. Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both? Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to Wieckless!). Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the "unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards. The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would require 4 x 6BQ5. You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time. It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them, he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance, Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor. Regards, John Byrns -- Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/ Andre Jute No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless Wieckless -- CE Statement of Conformity (1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever. (2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler -- Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/ |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
On May 24, 11:20 pm, Andre Jute wrote:
(snip) ... 16 is apparently 2*4). (snip) No, that's 8. 16 is 2^4 Cheers, Roger |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
Jeeze. Now I see why this trash appeared so fragmented. This thread is cross
posted to 4 newsgroups. That's a great way to trash multiple groups at the same time! Previous related threads were posted only to RAT. I was picking up only the latest venom from RAR+P. Phil B "Phil B" wrote in message news:bP96i.287$106.213@trndny02... I find it a sorry state of affairs when I see these fragmented responses after filtering. None of this needs posting here. Responders are just as whacky as the original poster. Original poster may be certifiably insane, but responders seem likewise to me. Phil B wrote in message oups.com... John Byrns wrote: In article .com, Peter Wieck wrote: On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898 What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration. Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both? Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to Wieckless!). Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the "unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards. The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would require 4 x 6BQ5. You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time. It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them, he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance, Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor. Regards, John Byrns -- Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/ Andre Jute No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless Wieckless -- CE Statement of Conformity (1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever. (2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
Yo, Phil B:
The guy you want to blame is one Arny Krueger, an "engineer" who hangs out on rec.audio.opinion. Your original question -- How does this end up on rec.antiques.radio+phono? -- struck me as so interesting that, before going off on a 100 mile drive in the lanes and Sunday lunch at The Snug in Bantry, I called a couple of grad students and told them to stop canoodling and instead make a transaction analysis of the various threads and find out who dunnit. I've just received the first verbal report and a written report will be published in a few weeks if you are interested. An internet slug called Peter Wieck has been trashing every one of my posts for 18 months or so. I just ignored him. We get the likes of him, who fancy themselves literate, all the time; it is like a fat little go-kart driver bragging, "Look Ma, I rubbed a Nascar Trucks hard man into the wall!", and in the next second the truck racer says, "What was that pimple in the road I just drove over?" Meanwhile this Wieck creep, apparently some kind of a jumped-up janitor from Philadelphia, proved so technically incompetent that John Byrns, a senior man on RAT, nicknamed him Useless Wieck. George Middius of RAO then changed Useless into "Worthless" to account for both technical incompetence and Wieck's observable moral degeneracy as a constant bully and hypocrite. I added "Wiecky" on account of the little man's pettiness, and now he was Worthless Wiecky. The other thing you need to know is that I'm a novelist (see URL under my sig) and some of my books, which resulted in sovereign governments sending assassins after me, were published under a pseudonym; Worthless Wiecky, like every other stalker, pretends to know the facts of his victim's life better than the victim himself; in particular Worthless pretended that Andre Jute (that's me now) is a sock puppet of the pseudonym Andrew McCoy. You can still see the stalker syndrome in Worthless Wiecky's so-called apology, in which he pretends I'm some kind of a handicapped person (I've already demonstrated I'm mentally perfectly capable of taking care of a jumped-up janitor, and the next time I pass through Philly, I'm perfectly happy, should there be any demand for it, to break Worthless's arms and legs to demonstrate that I am physically perfectly capable too). That's the background. So, after 18 months of mostly ignoring Worthless Wiecky, I see a post from George Middius about the way the stalker Worthless Wiecky tries to confuse my identity. The botch Worthless has made of this simple little job over no less than 18 months (Jesus, how does this incompetent earn a living?) offends me, so I dash off a quick, funny post confessing to having created Worthless Wiecky as my sock puppet. An exceedingly literal flatbilly biblebasher called Kenny XXX then abuses me for having, in contravention of scriptural probibition, created a "gollam" and I point out that my golem Worthless was made, not from genuine corpses, but from offal stuffed into a sock. At this point Arny Krueger, who earlier got badly scorched by his own hubris when I set him up as a lab rat in an experiment for a few gifted students of motivational psychology, starts claiming that Worthless Wiecky won the argument. When It is pointed out to Krueger by John Byrns that on the premier conferences where I can be found (RAT, UKRA, RAO) there is not a spot of my blood but the carpet is ankle-deep in Worthless Wiecky's blood, Krueger, cornered in another lie, then claims Worthless did the damage on rec.antiques.radio+phono. At this point Gray Glasser published an analysis of whose blood had been spilled and, presumably because Krueger insisted that rec.antiques.radio+phono was relevant, included rec.antiques.radio +phono in the distribution list. Gray also pointed out that a golem can't breed and I supplied the detail that just to make sure of it I crashed the bricks on Worthless Wiecky's balls and thus turned him into Worthless Wieckless, dickless golem. If you want to check this account, rec.audio.tubes has all the posts, starting about a fortnight back. My entire involvement in this affair was less than 15 minutes to dictate a couple of whimsical posts, and after it was over another twenty minutes for a phone call to get an answer to your question about who involved rec.antiques.radio+phono, receive the analysis and dictate this post. So,while you might normally say that I have a better understanding of the critical path of a flame war and its conduct than anyone else on the net, and all the necessary psychological and polemical skills to put it in train with the minimum of exertion, in this instance it wasn't me who involved some obscure little newsgroup, it was Arny Krueger who dunnit. In fact, I have an alibi: I wasn't even in town, I was away overnight, dining at Lord Kenmare's, when it happened. On my return, seeing that some of my own friends were disturbed enough by the fall of Worthless Wieckless to describe it as "brutal, ugly and one-sided" -- what else could it be: I'm a professional polemicist and Wieckless is a janitor -- I ducked out of the threads before I started generating sympathy for this undeserving little stalker Worthless Wieckless. There's your answer, Phil B. Go kick Krueger. He's the evil kingpin who involved innocent little old rec.antiques.radio+phono in the stalking "career" of Worthless Wieckless, golem. Krueger anyway richly deserves kicking any time you see him. Of course, the primary involvement of rec.antiques.radio+phono is by Worthless Wieckless, for abusing me there behind my back (use Google to search for McCoy and Jute). But I presume you fellows on rec.antiques.radio+phono can punish Wieckless adequately for his crimes. If you need help, call. Andre Jute Visit Andre at http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/ No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of the golem Worthless Wieckless -- CE Statement of Conformity Phil B wrote: Jeeze. Now I see why this trash appeared so fragmented. This thread is cross posted to 4 newsgroups. That's a great way to trash multiple groups at the same time! Previous related threads were posted only to RAT. I was picking up only the latest venom from RAR+P. Phil B "Phil B" wrote in message news:bP96i.287$106.213@trndny02... I find it a sorry state of affairs when I see these fragmented responses after filtering. None of this needs posting here. Responders are just as whacky as the original poster. Original poster may be certifiably insane, but responders seem likewise to me. Phil B wrote in message oups.com... John Byrns wrote: In article .com, Peter Wieck wrote: On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898 What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration. Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both? Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to Wieckless!). Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the "unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards. The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would require 4 x 6BQ5. You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time. It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them, he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance, Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor. Regards, John Byrns -- Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/ Andre Jute No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless Wieckless -- CE Statement of Conformity (1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever. (2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
Engineer wrote: On May 24, 11:20 pm, Andre Jute wrote: (snip) ... 16 is apparently 2*4). (snip) No, that's 8. 16 is 2^4 Cheers, Roger Gee, Rog, the things you know are amazing. -- André Jute |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
Engineer wrote: On May 24, 11:20 pm, Andre Jute wrote: (snip) ... 16 is apparently 2*4). (snip) No, that's 8. 16 is 2^4 Cheers, Roger Gee, Rog, the things you know are amazing. -- André Jute |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
Engineer wrote: On May 24, 11:20 pm, Andre Jute wrote: (snip) ... 16 is apparently 2*4). (snip) No, that's 8. 16 is 2^4 Cheers, Roger Gee, Rog, the things you know are amazing. -- André Jute |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
On 28 May 2007 05:45:15 -0700, Andre Jute wrote:
An internet slug called Peter Wieck Andre, You could not have picked a more worthy person. Worthless Wiecky fits well. Tracy __________________________________________________ __ For the folks that get confused when I post from different computers: KE4ODD, Tracy Fort, Beerbarrel and whatever the hell else you want to call me are all the same person!....ME! |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
KE4ODD wrote: On 28 May 2007 05:45:15 -0700, Andre Jute wrote: An internet slug called Peter Wieck Andre, You could not have picked a more worthy person. Worthless Wiecky fits well. Tracy Thanks, Tracy. Good to know that I didn't step on some innocent. That's why I usually give the little stalkers like Worthless Wieckless a year or so of open season on me before I put them down, so that nobody can say I overreacted. Here's the whole post you're responding to, so no one can be baffled by "fragmented posts" as Phil B was baffled until he grasped that several newsgroups are involved. ********** Yo, Phil B: The guy you want to blame is one Arny Krueger, an "engineer" who hangs out on rec.audio.opinion. Your original question -- How does this end up on rec.antiques.radio+phono? -- struck me as so interesting that, before going off on a 100 mile drive in the lanes and Sunday lunch at The Snug in Bantry, I called a couple of grad students and told them to stop canoodling and instead make a transaction analysis of the various threads and find out who dunnit. I've just received the first verbal report and a written report will be published in a few weeks if you are interested. An internet slug called Peter Wieck has been trashing every one of my posts for 18 months or so. I just ignored him. We get the likes of him, who fancy themselves literate, all the time; it is like a fat little go-kart driver bragging, "Look Ma, I rubbed a Nascar Trucks hard man into the wall!", and in the next second the truck racer says, "What was that pimple in the road I just drove over?" Meanwhile this Wieck creep, apparently some kind of a jumped-up janitor from Philadelphia, proved so technically incompetent that John Byrns, a senior man on RAT, nicknamed him Useless Wieck. George Middius of RAO then changed Useless into "Worthless" to account for both technical incompetence and Wieck's observable moral degeneracy as a constant bully and hypocrite. I added "Wiecky" on account of the little man's pettiness, and now he was Worthless Wiecky. The other thing you need to know is that I'm a novelist (see URL under my sig) and some of my books, which resulted in sovereign governments sending assassins after me, were published under a pseudonym; Worthless Wiecky, like every other stalker, pretends to know the facts of his victim's life better than the victim himself; in particular Worthless pretended that Andre Jute (that's me now) is a sock puppet of the pseudonym Andrew McCoy. You can still see the stalker syndrome in Worthless Wiecky's so-called apology, in which he pretends I'm some kind of a handicapped person (I've already demonstrated I'm mentally perfectly capable of taking care of a jumped-up janitor, and the next time I pass through Philly, I'm perfectly happy, should there be any demand for it, to break Worthless's arms and legs to demonstrate that I am physically perfectly capable too). That's the background. So, after 18 months of mostly ignoring Worthless Wiecky, I see a post from George Middius about the way the stalker Worthless Wiecky tries to confuse my identity. The botch Worthless has made of this simple little job over no less than 18 months (Jesus, how does this incompetent earn a living?) offends me, so I dash off a quick, funny post confessing to having created Worthless Wiecky as my sock puppet. An exceedingly literal flatbilly biblebasher called Kenny XXX then abuses me for having, in contravention of scriptural probibition, created a "gollam" and I point out that my golem Worthless was made, not from genuine corpses, but from offal stuffed into a sock. At this point Arny Krueger, who earlier got badly scorched by his own hubris when I set him up as a lab rat in an experiment for a few gifted students of motivational psychology, starts claiming that Worthless Wiecky won the argument. When It is pointed out to Krueger by John Byrns that on the premier conferences where I can be found (RAT, UKRA, RAO) there is not a spot of my blood but the carpet is ankle-deep in Worthless Wiecky's blood, Krueger, cornered in another lie, then claims Worthless did the damage on rec.antiques.radio+phono. At this point Gray Glasser published an analysis of whose blood had been spilled and, presumably because Krueger insisted that rec.antiques.radio+phono was relevant, included rec.antiques.radio +phono in the distribution list. Gray also pointed out that a golem can't breed and I supplied the detail that just to make sure of it I crashed the bricks on Worthless Wiecky's balls and thus turned him into Worthless Wieckless, dickless golem. If you want to check this account, rec.audio.tubes has all the posts, starting about a fortnight back. My entire involvement in this affair was less than 15 minutes to dictate a couple of whimsical posts, and after it was over another twenty minutes for a phone call to get an answer to your question about who involved rec.antiques.radio+phono, receive the analysis and dictate this post. So,while you might normally say that I have a better understanding of the critical path of a flame war and its conduct than anyone else on the net, and all the necessary psychological and polemical skills to put it in train with the minimum of exertion, in this instance it wasn't me who involved some obscure little newsgroup, it was Arny Krueger who dunnit. In fact, I have an alibi: I wasn't even in town, I was away overnight, dining at Lord Kenmare's, when it happened. On my return, seeing that some of my own friends were disturbed enough by the fall of Worthless Wieckless to describe it as "brutal, ugly and one-sided" -- what else could it be: I'm a professional polemicist and Wieckless is a janitor -- I ducked out of the threads before I started generating sympathy for this undeserving little stalker Worthless Wieckless. There's your answer, Phil B. Go kick Krueger. He's the evil kingpin who involved innocent little old rec.antiques.radio+phono in the stalking "career" of Worthless Wieckless, golem. Krueger anyway richly deserves kicking any time you see him. Of course, the primary involvement of rec.antiques.radio+phono is by Worthless Wieckless, for abusing me there behind my back (use Google to search for McCoy and Jute). But I presume you fellows on rec.antiques.radio+phono can punish Wieckless adequately for his crimes. If you need help, call. Andre Jute Visit Andre at http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/ No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of the golem Worthless Wieckless -- CE Statement of Conformity Phil B wrote: Jeeze. Now I see why this trash appeared so fragmented. This thread is cross posted to 4 newsgroups. That's a great way to trash multiple groups at the same time! Previous related threads were posted only to RAT. I was picking up only the latest venom from RAR+P. Phil B "Phil B" wrote in message news:bP96i.287$106.213@trndny02... I find it a sorry state of affairs when I see these fragmented responses after filtering. None of this needs posting here. Responders are just as whacky as the original poster. Original poster may be certifiably insane, but responders seem likewise to me. Phil B wrote in message oups.com... John Byrns wrote: In article .com, Peter Wieck wrote: On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898 What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration. Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both? Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to Wieckless!). Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the "unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards. The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would require 4 x 6BQ5. You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time. It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them, he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance, Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor. Regards, John Byrns -- Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/ Andre Jute No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless Wieckless -- CE Statement of Conformity (1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever. (2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler |
The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
Don't be so hard on your folks, Stevie ...they did the best they could.
west "Steven" wrote in message oups.com... On May 24, 8:25 pm, "west" wrote: "Peter Wieck" wrote in message oups.com... On May 24, 5:13 pm, Andre Jute wrote: John Byrns wrote: In article .com, Peter Wieck wrote: On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898 What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration. Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both? Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to Wieckless!). Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the "unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards. The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would require 4 x 6BQ5. You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time. It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them, he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance, Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor. Regards, John Byrns -- Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/ Andre Jute No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless Wieckless -- CE Statement of Conformity (1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever. (2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler Ittsssssss BAAAAcccckkkk..... I knew that it could not ever really 'leave the building'. That would be too good to be true even in the most perfect of all worlds. Hey, McCoy... we are all given to making mistakes. When will you admit to your first? I don't know when the Boss' first mistake was, but I know his latest one .... that was not easing up on you when you obviously had enough. I bet your dog doesn't even recognize you anymore. Brutal, ugly, one sided massacre. Take my advice and please don't mess around anymore with the Boss or high voltage... west Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA Big, fractured gasbags without an earnest lick of talent. PAH |
Public Apology to Andre Jute - And the Reasons Why
On May 25, 11:45 pm, "Scott W. Harvey" wrote:
Peter Wieck wrote: ethically, it is no mistake to apologize to a damaged individual, especially when one discovers that the damage explains almost entirely their otherwise incredibly inept, insane and deranged behavior. I have often stated that Usenet requires a dry sense of humor within the hide of a rhinocerous. Mr. Jute has neither, and that is beyond his control. So, if I engage with him in the future, I have to tone down the invective as he is afflicted with at least several of the long-term results of a stroke... Peter, I am curious as to why you chose to engage with this guy at all. When these bizarre threads started showing up in RAR+P, It took the reading of exactly one post to recognize that this guy was either a troll giving an academy-award caliber performance, or someone more loopy than all the rides at Magic Mountain put together. Either way, he isn't someome I'd waste any time on. -Scott Scott: Mr. Jute has fantasies and delusions of being a designer of amplifiers, speakers and other similar items. He also is the very first to pontificate on all things including audio, writing as if with a finger of fire on stone tablets. Sadly, the writings are idiotic and best and quite dangerous at worst. My engagement with him before I fully realized his affliction was in an attempt to stear others clear of him. At this point I only feel sorry for him, and have come to the realization that his condition is quite obvious in most anything he writes as well as in the character of those who gather about him in like-minded behavior. Perhaps it took longer than it should have, but there it is. At this point, I feel nothing but pity for him... and a passing puzzlement on how he fools even so few for so long. Jute cannot help himself... that is clear, and that is enough. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
Come on on guys, give Worthless Wieckless a chance, was Public Apology to Andre Jute - And the Reasons Why
Hey, Scott, since you're such a pal of the little netstalker Worthless
Wieckless aka Peter Wieck, why don't you ask him to prove his newly invented contention that what I write is "idiotic and best and quite dangerous at worst" (sic). All we've seen from Wieckless to me in the 18 months he has been on RAT is 211 personally abusive messages with zero technical content, so I ignored him as merely another little useless stalker trying to fatten up his own image by attacks on a star. When after 18 months it was time to take him out, I merely played by the rules Worthless Wieckless himself made which, as I explained to Phil B, were about identity confusion. It would be most amusing if you could persuade Worthless to come play the game by my rules, which fall at the juncture (to you, "interface") of technology and taste. Of course the little jumped-up janitor will be quashed again in both technical and aesthetic discourse, but at least we'll have a giggle in the process, and we can add to the entertainment with bets on how long I can keep the darling little janitor in the game by letting him think he's "winning" something. Go on, Scott, don't just vegetate in the bleachers all your life, be a player. Your reward for persuading Wieckless to stop running like a frightened rabbit and come face the music (heh-heh, very appropriate for an audio group!) will be the gratitude of the entire Circus Maximus-- er, I mean RAT membership. Andre "Finger of Fire" Jute Visit Jute on Amps at http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/ STATUTORY DECLARATION No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of Andre Jute's golem Peter Wieck aka Worthless Wieckless --- CE Certificate of Conformity Worthless Wieckless wrote: On May 25, 11:45 pm, "Scott W. Harvey" wrote: Peter Wieck wrote: ethically, it is no mistake to apologize to a damaged individual, especially when one discovers that the damage explains almost entirely their otherwise incredibly inept, insane and deranged behavior. I have often stated that Usenet requires a dry sense of humor within the hide of a rhinocerous. Mr. Jute has neither, and that is beyond his control. So, if I engage with him in the future, I have to tone down the invective as he is afflicted with at least several of the long-term results of a stroke... Peter, I am curious as to why you chose to engage with this guy at all. When these bizarre threads started showing up in RAR+P, It took the reading of exactly one post to recognize that this guy was either a troll giving an academy-award caliber performance, or someone more loopy than all the rides at Magic Mountain put together. Either way, he isn't someome I'd waste any time on. -Scott Scott: Mr. Jute has fantasies and delusions of being a designer of amplifiers, speakers and other similar items. He also is the very first to pontificate on all things including audio, writing as if with a finger of fire on stone tablets. Sadly, the writings are idiotic and best and quite dangerous at worst. My engagement with him before I fully realized his affliction was in an attempt to stear others clear of him. At this point I only feel sorry for him, and have come to the realization that his condition is quite obvious in most anything he writes as well as in the character of those who gather about him in like-minded behavior. Perhaps it took longer than it should have, but there it is. At this point, I feel nothing but pity for him... and a passing puzzlement on how he fools even so few for so long. Jute cannot help himself... that is clear, and that is enough. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
Come on on guys, give Worthless Wieckless a chance, was Public Apology to Andre Jute - And the Reasons Why
In article m,
Andre Jute wrote: Hey, Scott, since you're such a pal of the little netstalker Worthless Wieckless aka Peter Wieck, why don't you ask him to prove his newly invented contention that what I write is "idiotic and best and quite dangerous at worst" (sic). All we've seen from Wieckless to me in the 18 months he has been on RAT is 211 personally abusive messages with zero technical content, so I ignored him as merely another little useless stalker trying to fatten up his own image by attacks on a star. When after 18 months it was time to take him out, I merely played by the rules Worthless Wieckless himself made which, as I explained to Phil B, were about identity confusion. Hi Andre, Notice that following his "apology" Wiecky has pretty much withdrawn from posting, excepting a few weak defenses of his "apology". I suspect that this stems from Peter's realization that he had shot himself in the foot with his constant attacks on you, and that he had done his own reputation more harm than he was able to do to you, his intended target. Weakened from loss of blood due to the foot wound, and suffering from extreme embarrassment as a result of his heavy handed attempts to discredit you, he seems to have concocted his "apology" as an exit strategy, and decided to lay low to give his reputation a chance to recover. Regards, John Byrns -- Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/ |
Come on on guys, give Worthless Wieckless a chance, was Public Apology to Andre Jute - And the Reasons Why
On Tue, 29 May 2007 09:08:36 -0500, John Byrns
wrote: In article m, Andre Jute wrote: Hey, Scott, since you're such a pal of the little netstalker Worthless Wieckless aka Peter Wieck, why don't you ask him to prove his newly invented contention that what I write is "idiotic and best and quite dangerous at worst" (sic). All we've seen from Wieckless to me in the 18 months he has been on RAT is 211 personally abusive messages with zero technical content, so I ignored him as merely another little useless stalker trying to fatten up his own image by attacks on a star. When after 18 months it was time to take him out, I merely played by the rules Worthless Wieckless himself made which, as I explained to Phil B, were about identity confusion. Hi Andre, Notice that following his "apology" Wiecky has pretty much withdrawn from posting, excepting a few weak defenses of his "apology". I suspect that this stems from Peter's realization that he had shot himself in the foot with his constant attacks on you, and that he had done his own reputation more harm than he was able to do to you, his intended target. Weakened from loss of blood due to the foot wound, and suffering from extreme embarrassment as a result of his heavy handed attempts to discredit you, he seems to have concocted his "apology" as an exit strategy, and decided to lay low to give his reputation a chance to recover. Regards, John Byrns Maybe he is busy exploring the non business end of his mop handle? __________________________________________________ __ For the folks that get confused when I post from different computers: KE4ODD, Tracy Fort, Beerbarrel and whatever the hell else you want to call me are all the same person!....ME! |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:27 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk