|
|
The product we've all been waiting for;!...
|
The product we've all been waiting for;!...
"tony sayer" wrote in message ... http://www.shakti-innovations.com/audiovideo.htm -- Tony Sayer A very expensive lump of ferrite perhaps?? |
The product we've all been waiting for;!...
"tony sayer" wrote in message ... http://www.shakti-innovations.com/audiovideo.htm -- Never mind that nonsense, Tony - I'm still waiting to hear if an FM signal strength of '55 dBf' as per: http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Signal.JPG Is reckoned to be 'good' (or 'good enough')...??? (Certainly sounds OK!!) |
The product we've all been waiting for;!...
"Keith G" wrote in message ... "tony sayer" wrote in message ... http://www.shakti-innovations.com/audiovideo.htm -- Never mind that nonsense, Tony - I'm still waiting to hear if an FM signal strength of '55 dBf' as per: http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Signal.JPG Is reckoned to be 'good' (or 'good enough')...??? (Certainly sounds OK!!) Keith:- If I haven't pressed any wrong tits on my calculator, 55dBf means 55dB above 1 femtowatt, or 10^12 watts 55dB is a power ratio of 3.16 x 10^5 so 55dBf is a power level of 0.316 microwatts. Assuming a standard 75 ohm antenna, that translates to 4.87 mV, so I'd say that was a pretty good signal. S. -- http://audiopages.googlepages.com |
The product we've all been waiting for;!...
"tony sayer" wrote in message ... http://www.shakti-innovations.com/audiovideo.htm -- Tony Sayer What staggers me is the references they give. Do Abbey Road *really* use stuff like this, and do they know their name is being use by these people? Glad to see there isn't a single Broadcaster amongst their references. S. -- http://audiopages.googlepages.com |
The product we've all been waiting for;!...
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:18:01 +0100, "Serge Auckland"
wrote: "tony sayer" wrote in message ... http://www.shakti-innovations.com/audiovideo.htm -- Tony Sayer What staggers me is the references they give. Do Abbey Road *really* use stuff like this, and do they know their name is being use by these people? Glad to see there isn't a single Broadcaster amongst their references. S. They probably sent a free one there, and have based their claim on the fact that it may, just possibly, not have actually been thrown in the bin. d -- Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
The product we've all been waiting for;!...
In article , Keith G
writes "tony sayer" wrote in message ... http://www.shakti-innovations.com/audiovideo.htm -- Never mind that nonsense, Tony - I'm still waiting to hear if an FM signal strength of '55 dBf' as per: http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Signal.JPG Is reckoned to be 'good' (or 'good enough')...??? (Certainly sounds OK!!) So it should, how do you think it compares with DAB?... -- Tony Sayer |
The product we've all been waiting for;!...
In article , Serge Auckland
writes "Keith G" wrote in message ... "tony sayer" wrote in message ... http://www.shakti-innovations.com/audiovideo.htm -- Never mind that nonsense, Tony - I'm still waiting to hear if an FM signal strength of '55 dBf' as per: http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Signal.JPG Is reckoned to be 'good' (or 'good enough')...??? (Certainly sounds OK!!) Keith:- If I haven't pressed any wrong tits on my calculator, 55dBf means 55dB above 1 femtowatt, or 10^12 watts 55dB is a power ratio of 3.16 x 10^5 so 55dBf is a power level of 0.316 microwatts. Assuming a standard 75 ohm antenna, that translates to 4.87 mV, so I'd say that was a pretty good signal. S. That tuner uses a common place audio demod chip just to drive the sig and deviation meters!. They use a totally separate pulse count discriminator for the audio .. and excellent it is too:)) -- Tony Sayer |
The product we've all been waiting for;!...
In article , Serge Auckland
writes "tony sayer" wrote in message ... http://www.shakti-innovations.com/audiovideo.htm -- Tony Sayer What staggers me is the references they give. Do Abbey Road *really* use stuff like this, and do they know their name is being use by these people? It gets even better!!.. http://www.shakti-innovations.com/hallograph.htm The more stupid the name of all that carp the more silly it is!.. Glad to see there isn' t a single Broadcaster amongst their references. S. -- Tony Sayer |
The product we've all been waiting for;!...
In article , Don Pearce
writes On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:18:01 +0100, "Serge Auckland" wrote: "tony sayer" wrote in message ... http://www.shakti-innovations.com/audiovideo.htm -- Tony Sayer What staggers me is the references they give. Do Abbey Road *really* use stuff like this, and do they know their name is being use by these people? Glad to see there isn't a single Broadcaster amongst their references. S. They probably sent a free one there, and have based their claim on the fact that it may, just possibly, not have actually been thrown in the bin. d LOL!... prolly the truth! -- Tony Sayer |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 01:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk