A STAX 252A amp, same as the 2050 sold in anglo markets, has parallel-
connected input ports, called "through ports". With both sets of
inputs connected, one to a CD player, one to a computer output, the
sound is muted, dulled. With the computer leads pulled, the sound is
louder and brighter.

Is this report what we would expect? What is the key mechanism at work
here? Suggest some ballpark values.

Newbies especially welcome.

Andre Jute
Invigilator

"Andre Jute" wrote in message
ups.com...
A STAX 252A amp, same as the 2050 sold in anglo markets, has parallel-
connected input ports, called "through ports". With both sets of
inputs connected, one to a CD player, one to a computer output, the
sound is muted, dulled. With the computer leads pulled, the sound is
louder and brighter.

Is this report what we would expect?

**Possibly. When connecting the two sources together, the results can be
expected to be unpredictable.

What is the key mechanism at work
here?

**A stupid operator.

Suggest some ballpark values.

**I would expect that the output impedances of the two sources would be
between 100 Ohms and 1,000 Ohms. You haven't listed any brand/model numbers,
nor the specs, so speculation is the order of the day.


Newbies especially welcome.

**Only a rank newbie would connect two sources together and expect anything
but disaster.

Trevor Wilson

On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 13:54:31 -0800, Andre Jute
wrote:

A STAX 252A amp, same as the 2050 sold in anglo markets, has parallel-
connected input ports, called "through ports". With both sets of
inputs connected, one to a CD player, one to a computer output, the
sound is muted, dulled. With the computer leads pulled, the sound is
louder and brighter.


It sounds as if it doesn't have parallal input ports at all (which
would be most unusual). It has an input port and a through port,
designed to link to a secong amplifier.

Laurence Payne wrote:

Andre Jute wrote:

A STAX 252A amp, same as the 2050 sold in anglo markets, has parallel-
connected input ports, called "through ports". With both sets of
inputs connected, one to a CD player, one to a computer output, the
sound is muted, dulled. With the computer leads pulled, the sound is
louder and brighter.

It sounds as if it doesn't have parallal input ports at all (which
would be most unusual). It has an input port and a through port,
designed to link to a secong amplifier.

"input port" = *input*

The 'port word' is an obfuscational verbal device used by the clueless to try
and hide their incompetence and inadequacy. Widely used by Google Groupers.

Graham

On Nov 7, 10:26 pm, Laurence Payne NOSPAMlpayne1ATdsl.pipex.com
wrote:
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 13:54:31 -0800, Andre Jute
wrote:

A STAX 252A amp, same as the 2050 sold in anglo markets, has parallel-
connected input ports, called "through ports". With both sets of
inputs connected, one to a CD player, one to a computer output, the
sound is muted, dulled. With the computer leads pulled, the sound is
louder and brighter.

It sounds as if it doesn't have parallal input ports at all (which
would be most unusual). It has an input port and a through port,
designed to link to a secong amplifier.

Bril. That's what the student is supposed to work out for himself.
It's a trick question. It's an amp to drive highvoltage electrostatic
headphones, and supply HV bias for the the diaphraghms. As such it has
to be inserted in existing chains. Therefore, through-ports.

I'm listening to Rachel Masters play Gliere's Harp Concerto on the
Stax SR-202 Headphones right now. It is a stunningly beautiful sound.
I recommend Stax headphones to anyone, especially those with small
listening spaces, or who listen late at night, as a cheap way to get
95 per cent of what Quad floorstanding electrostatics deliver.

Those of you in Europe needn't pay the exorbitant prices of the
official importers; you can import directly from Japan at a huge
saving. I wrote an article about my experiences with direct import of
Stax headphones which you can read he
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/showthread.php?t=215182

Andre Jute
"I was at a board meeting for the LA Chapter of the Audio Engineering
Society last night on XM Satellite radio audio and data transmission.
Sadly, we missed you there, and at the SMPTE and Acoustical Society
recent meetings as well. Everyone was asking, 'Where is that wonderful
Andre Jute? The world just doesn't rotate without him...'" -- John
Mayberry, Emmaco

On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:34:34 -0800, Andre Jute
wrote:

It sounds as if it doesn't have parallal input ports at all (which
would be most unusual). It has an input port and a through port,
designed to link to a secong amplifier.

Bril. That's what the student is supposed to work out for himself.
It's a trick question. It's an amp to drive highvoltage electrostatic
headphones, and supply HV bias for the the diaphraghms. As such it has
to be inserted in existing chains. Therefore, through-ports.

Not a trick question, but a misleadingly incorrect one. There are not
parallal input connections.

Andre Jute wrote:

A STAX 252A amp, same as the 2050 sold in anglo markets, has parallel-
connected input ports, called "through ports".

You must have just discovered the word "PORT" it seems.

The word 'port' is only used by people who haven't a clue what it really is and
what to really call it.

Graham

E

You must have just discovered the word "PORT" it seems.

The word 'port' is only used by people who haven't a clue what it really is and
what to really call it.


No, it's used by people who prefer port to vermouth... :-)

On Nov 8, 8:05 pm, robert casey wrote:
Eeyore wrote:

You must have just discovered the word "PORT" it seems.

The word 'port' is only used by people who haven't a clue what it really is and
what to really call it.

No, it's used by people who prefer port to vermouth... :-)

And by the gin-and-pink drinkers too, as in POSH -- port out,
starboard home...

....out being India, home being England, and the side of the ship being
important because it will be in the shade.

Andre Jute

Andre Jute wrote:
On Nov 8, 8:05 pm, robert casey wrote:
Eeyore wrote:

You must have just discovered the word "PORT" it seems.
The word 'port' is only used by people who haven't a clue what it really is and
what to really call it.
No, it's used by people who prefer port to vermouth... :-)

And by the gin-and-pink drinkers too, as in POSH -- port out,
starboard home...

...out being India, home being England, and the side of the ship being
important because it will be in the shade.

False etymology.
And before the opening of the Suez Canal it would have been SOPH.

--
Eiron.