In article ,
Baggy wrote:
Would you expect the more normal organist to play for free too?

Completely irrelevant to the topic.

The way a person derives his income isn't to some. I realise you think
that a composer has no rights to his work, but then that's commonplace
these days.

--
*Dance like nobody's watching.

Dave Plowman London SW 12
RIP Acorn

Oh great, another petty arsehole.

On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 14:03:01 +0100, Dave Plowman
wrote:

In article ,
Baggy wrote:
Would you expect the more normal organist to play for free too?

Completely irrelevant to the topic.

The way a person derives his income isn't to some. I realise you think
that a composer has no rights to his work, but then that's commonplace
these days.

In article ,
Zipper wrote:
Oh great, another petty arsehole.

I'd be interested to know if it would still be petty if it were *your*
money. Somehow, I doubt it.

And, FWIW, I don't earn my living or any part of it by royalties.

--
*Time is fun when you're having flies... Kermit

Dave Plowman London SW 12
RIP Acorn

"Dave Plowman" wrote in

I'd be interested to know if it would still be petty if it
were *your*
money. Somehow, I doubt it.


In the words of the greatest usenet piper that ever lived,
"Shut the **** Up and just play!".

In article ,
Comp Piper wrote:
I'd be interested to know if it would still be petty if it were *your*
money. Somehow, I doubt it.


In the words of the greatest usenet piper that ever lived,
"Shut the **** Up and just play!".

A piper that plays with himself but virtually.

--
*42.7% of statistics are made up. Sorry, that should read 47.2% *

Dave Plowman London SW 12
RIP Acorn

In article ,
Comp Piper wrote:
I'd be interested to know if it would still be petty if it were *your*
money. Somehow, I doubt it.


In the words of the greatest usenet piper that ever lived,
"Shut the **** Up and just play!".

A piper that plays with himself but virtually.

--
*42.7% of statistics are made up. Sorry, that should read 47.2% *

Dave Plowman London SW 12
RIP Acorn

On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 16:40:48 GMT, "Comp Piper"
wrote:


"Dave Plowman" wrote in

I'd be interested to know if it would still be petty if it
were *your*
money. Somehow, I doubt it.


In the words of the greatest usenet piper that ever lived,
"Shut the **** Up and just play!".

I don't recall saying that, but if you remember it I'll take your word
that I said it.

On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 16:40:48 GMT, "Comp Piper"
wrote:


"Dave Plowman" wrote in

I'd be interested to know if it would still be petty if it
were *your*
money. Somehow, I doubt it.


In the words of the greatest usenet piper that ever lived,
"Shut the **** Up and just play!".

I don't recall saying that, but if you remember it I'll take your word
that I said it.

"Dave Plowman" wrote in

I'd be interested to know if it would still be petty if it
were *your*
money. Somehow, I doubt it.


In the words of the greatest usenet piper that ever lived,
"Shut the **** Up and just play!".

On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 14:54:44 +0100, Dave Plowman
wrote:

In article ,
Zipper wrote:
Oh great, another petty arsehole.

I'd be interested to know if it would still be petty if it were *your*
money. Somehow, I doubt it.

And, FWIW, I don't earn my living or any part of it by royalties.

Then you have no excuse for being a petty arsehole, now do you?