A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

What a sad excuse for a group this is...



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old December 28th 07, 03:42 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
borosteve
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 44
Default What a sad excuse for a group this is...

On 28 Dec, 14:55, Laurence Payne NOSPAMlpayne1ATdsl.pipex.com wrote:
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 06:42:25 -0800 (PST), Andy Evans

wrote:
I think the difficulty here is that "listeners" is a variable and so
is "test conditions". The test conditions would be not too difficult
to replicate, but the listeners could not be easily replicated, nor
could their emotional/health states at time of testing, even if they
were.


I would hazard a guess that the quality, aural acuity and perceptual
sensitivity of a listening panel could not be easily standardised, and
since the whole experiment depends on their aural perception, I'd
forsee this as a logistical problem.


Why would you need to? The only thing we're trying to establish is
whether one length of wire sounds different to another. To these
listeners, here, today. We find that they don't. So we try another
set, another place another time. They can't tell any difference
either. Anyone who thinks he can has an easy million dollars waiting
to be collected. It's been waiting a long time :-)


Is it cash or a cheque?
Borosteve.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old January 9th 08, 04:04 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Iain Churches[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,648
Default What a sad excuse for a group this is...



--
Iain
Aural perception is a skill that requires study and careful development over
along period of time. Few have it as a natural gift.
"borosteve" wrote in message
...
On 28 Dec, 14:55, Laurence Payne NOSPAMlpayne1ATdsl.pipex.com wrote:
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 06:42:25 -0800 (PST), Andy Evans

wrote:
I think the difficulty here is that "listeners" is a variable and so
is "test conditions". The test conditions would be not too difficult
to replicate, but the listeners could not be easily replicated, nor
could their emotional/health states at time of testing, even if they
were.


I would hazard a guess that the quality, aural acuity and perceptual
sensitivity of a listening panel could not be easily standardised, and
since the whole experiment depends on their aural perception, I'd
forsee this as a logistical problem.


Why would you need to? The only thing we're trying to establish is
whether one length of wire sounds different to another. To these
listeners, here, today. We find that they don't. So we try another
set, another place another time. They can't tell any difference
either. Anyone who thinks he can has an easy million dollars waiting
to be collected. It's been waiting a long time :-)


Is it cash or a cheque?
Borosteve.


It is paid in solid gold - (wire)
Iain



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.