HI-FI FETISHISM A psychologist's view of the lunatic fringe
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"David Looser" wrote in
message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"David Looser" wrote in
message
Are you really suggesting that digital audio was *not*
the result of some serious R&D?
In the sense that digital audio technology was ported
into the audio industry from other industries.
All the electronics and communications technologies have
fed off each other from the invention of the electric
telegraph onwards, so what?
Before the telegraph there was no such thing as transmission of
electricity over such long distances.
Certainly. The electric telegraph is the grand-daddy of the entire
telecomms/broadcasting/audio-video/computing sector. (I thought that was
*my* point?)
Before the telephone there was no such thing as electroacoustics. This is
very basic technology, not adding a gold plating to stuff that has been
around for 50 years.
I'm not sure who you think is gold-plating what. I was responding to "In the
sense that digital audio technology was ported into the audio industry from
other industries" Whilst it is certainly true that digital audio relied upon
technologies developed for other sectors, to suggest that digital audio
*didn't* require a good deal of R&D to adapt those technologies to this new
application is nonsense. From the electric telegraph onwards the various
branches: telephones, wireless telegraphy, sound broadcasting, computers,
television etc. etc. have all contributed technological advances and
components to each other. The use of digital electronic technology
originally developed for computers in the development of digital audio is no
different from the use of valves developed for radio applications in the
development of digital computers a few decades earlier.
David.
|