Soundhaspriority wrote:

I copied this off r.a.m.p.s. : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HyBm_6XryE

Look for the control room shot. It looks like two separate 1/4" tape
machines. I wonder if they were synced?

Already answered in r.a.p.

Probably Vortexions and not synched. They had AC mains driven synchronous
motors and besides the Vortexions appear to be mono types.

Graham

Eeyore wrote:

Soundhaspriority wrote:

I copied this off r.a.m.p.s. : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HyBm_6XryE

Look for the control room shot. It looks like two separate 1/4" tape
machines. I wonder if they were synced?

Already answered in r.a.p.

Probably Vortexions and not synched. They had AC mains driven synchronous
motors and besides the Vortexions appear to be mono types.

Graham



Indeed, and in those days it was not uncommon to record to two machines
at once keeping one as a safety copy in case someone cocked up the editing.

Cheers

Ian

In article ,
Ian Thompson-Bell wrote:
Indeed, and in those days it was not uncommon to record to two machines
at once keeping one as a safety copy in case someone cocked up the
editing.

Recording in duplex is till the way for important stuff. Even digital
recorders can fail. ;-)

--
*If you remember the '60s, you weren't really there

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.